The Effect of Pre-Stenting on Bleeding-Related Complications Following Ureteroscopy in Patients on Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy.

Introduction: The American Urological Association guidelines state that continuing anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) agents during ureteroscopy (URS) is safe. Through a multi-institutional retrospective study, we sought to determine whether pre-stenting in patients on AP or AC was associated with fewer URS bleeding-related complications. Methods: A series of 8614 URS procedures performed across three institutions (April 2010 to September 2017) was electronically reviewed for AC/AP use at time of URS. Records indicating AC or AP use at time of URS were then manually reviewed to characterize intraoperative and 30-day postoperative (intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hematuria, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, unplanned reoperation, phone calls, and other minor 30-day complications). Results: A total of 293 identified URS procedures were completed on patients on AC/AP therapy-112 cases were on AC only (38 were pre-stented), 158 on AP only (51 pre-stented), and 23 on both AP and AC (8 pre-stented). Patient characteristics and comorbidities were similar between the pre-stented and non-pre-stented groups. For AC and AP subjects, pre-stenting did not decrease the composite risk of bleeding complications (10.3% pre-stent vs 12.2% non-prestent, p = 0.6). Pre-stented patients did have a significantly lower likelihood of requiring an unplanned reoperation (1.0% vs 5.6%, p = 0.04). In the subgroup of patients on AP alone, pre-stented patients had significantly fewer episodes of intraoperative bleeding (0% vs 9%, p = 0.04), unplanned reoperations (0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02), and 30-day complications (14% vs 27%, p = 0.05). In the subgroup of patients on AC alone, there were no significant differences in outcomes based on stent status. Conclusions: In this multi-institutional study, we found that pre-stenting before URS was not associated with fewer bleeding complications. However, pre-stenting appeared to be associated with improved outcomes for those patients on AP therapy. These results suggest a need for prospective studies to clarify the role of pre-stenting for URS.

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Initial North American Experience.

Introduction and Objectives: The goal of this study is to evaluate the outcomes in a cohort of patients who underwent minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) at a single institution from 2017 to 2019. Methods: Sixty patients at a single institution with two different surgeons underwent MIP from 2017 to 2019. The MIP technique uses a proprietary nephroscope with a "vacuum" technique for stone evacuation. Patients were identified who had postoperative CT scan imaging available for direct review. A prospectively maintained database was queried along with retrospective chart review to evaluate the stone-free rate defined as no stones on CT imaging. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed including initial stone size, access type (fluoroscopic vs ultrasonic), access location, operative positioning (supine vs prone), operative time, and 60-day complications. Results: Forty-six of 60 patients had CT imaging postoperatively that were reviewable. Of these, 43% (n = 20) were stone free as defined by no identifiable fragments seen, 11% (n = 5) had residual fragments 0 to 2 mm, 7% (n = 3) had residual fragments 2 to 4 mm, and 39% (n = 18) had residual fragments >4 mm. Mean initial stone size was 21 mm (1.9-84 mm). Sixty percent (n = 28) of the patients were discharged the same day as surgery. Fifty-one percent (n = 24) of access was achieved through ultrasound alone. Seventeen percent of patients (n = 8) had a complication within 30 days of surgery. All complications were Clavien III or lower with unplanned return to operating room rate of 2% (n = 1). Conclusions: We present North America's first single institution analysis of MIP cases with acceptable outcomes comparable with both retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The exact role of MIP in renal stone disease needs to be determined by future studies that critically assess their outcomes.

Nephrostomy tubes placed emergently prior to percutaneous renal stone surgery are practical for obtaining access. / La colocación de nefrostomía percutánea antes de la cirugía percutánea de la litiasis facilita la obtención del acceso.

OBJECTIVES: Renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) may be obtained via a pre-existing nephrostomy tube (NT) tract; however, emergent NTs are not always ideal for subsequent surgery. We sought to determine the rate of NT tract usability and assess factors related to the usability of emergently placed NTs. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of UC San Diego subjects undergoing percutaneous renal surgery between January 2016 and October 2018. Demographics and peri-operative variables were collected. The primary outcome was the usability of NT tract for dilation and instrumentation. "Usable" indicated a tract in which PCNL could be completed; "unusable" indicated lack of dilation and the requirement of additional tract(s) for PCNL. RESULTS: 35 PCNL cases had previous emergently placed NT which were indwelling at time of percutaneous surgery. 51% of these NT tracts (18/35) were deemed usable and dilated for PCNL. No significant difference was seen between usable and unusable NT groups for number of dilated tracts during PCNL (p=0.13), or either the location of indwelling NT (p=0.96) or renal stones (p=0.95). In the usable NT tract cohort PCNL access was via the lower pole 56% of the time, where as when previous NT tracts were deemed unusable, a separate upper-pole access was obtained intra-operatively 53% of the time (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing, emergent NTs served a ssufficient PCNL access tracts in over half of recorded cases. Contrary to recently published reports, the utility of pre-existing NTs appears to vary among health systems. Other variables, including the desired location of PCNL appear to directly influence the like lihood of NT tract usability.

OBJETIVOS: El acceso renal en la nefrolitotomía percutánea puede obtenerse a través de una nefrostomía pre-existente, aunque las nefrostomías urgentes no siempre son ideales para la posterior cirugía. Nosotros intentamos determinar la tasa de uso del tracto de nefrostomía y los factores de acceso relacionados con el uso de la nefrostomía urgente.MÉTODOS: Una revisión retrospectiva se realizó en UC San Diego de los pacientes que habían recibido cirugía renal percutánea entre enero 2016 y octubre 2018. Las variables demográficas y perioperatorias fueron recolectadas. El objetivo primario fue el uso del trayecto de nefrostomía después de dilatación e instrumentación.¨Usable"  indicó un trayecto en el que la nefrolitotomía percutánea se completo. "No usable" indicó falta de dilatación y el requerimiento de un nuevo trayecto para la cirugía percutánea. RESULTADOS: 35 casos de nefrolitotomía percutánea tenían nefrostomías urgentes previamente y presentes al empezar la cirugía. 51% de estos trayectos (18/35) fueron usados y dilatados para la nefrolitotomía percutánea. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los trayectos usables y no usables en el numero de trayectos dilatados durante la cirugía percutánea (p=0,13), ni en la localización de la sonda de nefrostomía (p=0,96) o las litiasis renales (p=0,95). En el grupo de pacientes con nefrostomía usable, en el 56% la nefrostomía accedía por el polo inferior. Cuando el trayecto de nefrostomía se considero no usable, un nuevo acceso intraoperatorio por el polo superior fue obtenido en el 53% de lo scasos (p<0,01). CONCLUSIONES: El trayecto de nefrostomía pre-existente fue suficiente para el acceso percutáneo en la mitad de los casos. Contrario a lo publicado recientemente, la utilidad de la nefrostomía pre-existente parece variar según el Sistema sanitario. Otras variables, incluyendo la localización deseada para la nefrostomía influencia el uso del trayecto.

Nephrostomy tubes placed emergently prior to percutaneous renal stone surgery are practical for obtaining access / La colocación de nefrostomía percutánea antes de la cirugía percutánea de la litiasis facilita la obtención del acceso

OBJECTIVES: Renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) may be obtained via a pre-existing nephrostomy tube (NT) tract; however, emergent NTs are not always ideal for subsequent surgery. We sought to determine the rate of NT tract usability and assess factors related to the usability of emergently placed NTs. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of UC San Diego subjects undergoing percutaneous renal surgery between January 2016 and October 2018. Demographics and peri-operative variables were collected. The primary outcome was the usability of NT tract for dilation and instrumentation. "Usable" indicated a tract in which PCNL could be completed; "unusable" indicated lack of dilation and the requirement of additional tract(s) for PCNL. RESULTS: 35 PCNL cases had previous emergently placed NT which were indwelling at time of percutaneous surgery. 51% of these NT tracts (18/35) were deemed usable and dilated for PCNL. No significant difference was seen between usable and unusable NT groups for number of dilated tracts during PCNL (p = 0.13), or either the location of indwelling NT (p = 0.96) or renal stones (p = 0.95). In the usable NT tract cohort PCNL access was via the lower pole 56% of the time, whereas when previous NT tracts were deemed unusable, a separate upper-pole access was obtained intra-operatively 53% of the time (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-existing, emergent NTs served as sufficient PCNL access tracts in over half of recorded cases. Contrary to recently published reports, the utility of pre-existing NTs appears to vary among health systems. Other variables, including the desired location of PCNL appear to directly influence the likelihood of NT tract usability

OBJETIVOS: El acceso renal en la nefrolitotomía percutánea puede obtenerse a través de una nefrostomía pre-existente, aunque las nefrostomías urgentes no siempre son ideales para la posterior cirugía. Nosotros intentamos determinar la tasa de uso del tracto de nefrostomía y los factores de acceso relacionados con el uso de la nefrostomía urgente. MÉTODOS: Una revisión retrospectiva se realizó en UC San Diego de los pacientes que habían recibido cirugía renal percutánea entre enero 2016 y octubre 2018. Las variables demográficas y perioperatorias fueron recolectadas. El objetivo primario fue el uso del trayecto de nefrostomía después de dilatación e instrumentación. ¨Usable" indicó un trayecto en el que la nefrolitotomía percutánea se completó. "No usable" indicó falta de dilatación y el requerimiento de un nuevo trayecto para la cirugía percutánea. RESULTADOS: 35 casos de nefrolitotomía percutánea tenían nefrostomías urgentes previamente y presentes al empezar la cirugía. 51% de estos trayectos (18/35) fueron usados y dilatados para la nefrolitotomía percutánea. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los trayectos usables y no usables en el número de trayectos dilatados durante la cirugía percutánea (p = 0,13), ni en la localización de la sonda de nefrostomía (p = 0,96) o las litiasis renales (p = 0,95). En el grupo de pacientes con nefrostomía usable, en el 56% la nefrostomía accedía por el polo inferior. Cuando el trayecto de nefrostomía se consideró no usable, un nuevo acceso intraoperatorio por el polo superior fue obtenido en el 53% de los casos (p < 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: El trayecto de nefrostomía pre-existente fue suficiente para el acceso percutáneo en la mitad de los casos. Contrario a lo publicado recientemente, la utilidad de la nefrostomía pre-existente parece variar según el Sistema sanitario. Otras variables, incluyendo la localización deseada para la nefrostomía influencia el uso del trayecto

Antibiotics are not necessary during routine cystoscopic stent removal: A randomized controlled trial at UC San Diego.

INTRODUCTION: Current American Urological Association (AUA) Best Practice Statement recommends antibiotic prophylaxis for cystoscopy with manipulation, including stent removal; although no Level 1b trials explicitly address prophylaxis for stent removal. We sought to determine the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infectious complications after stent removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, patients undergoing removal of ureteral stent placed during stone surgery were recruited from July 2016 to March 2019. Patients were recruited at the time of stent removal and randomized to treatment (single dose 500 mg oral ciprofloxacin) or control group (no antibiotics). Telephone contact was attempted within 14 days of stent removal to assess for urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms, antibiotic prescriptions, or Emergency Department visits. Primary outcome was UTI within 1 month of stent removal - defined by irritative voiding symptoms, fever or abdominal pain associated with positive urine culture (Ucx) (>100k colony-forming units/mL). RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were enrolled, with 58 meeting final inclusion criteria for the analysis (33 treatment, 25 controls). No differences were seen with clinical and demographic variables, except a higher body mass index in the treatment group (P = 0.007). Positive Ucx rate before stone surgery (16.7% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.819) and at the time of stent removal (16.0% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.648) was not significantly different in treatment versus control groups, respectively. Primary outcome: No patients in either cohort developed symptomatic culture-diagnosed UTI within 1 month of stent removal. Of patients with documented phone follow-up (treatment n = 29, control n = 22), only one patient (control) reported any positive response on phone survey. CONCLUSIONS: We found a low infectious complication rate regardless of antibiotic prophylaxis use during cystoscopic stent removal. The necessity of antibiotics during routine cystoscopic stent removal warrants possible reevaluation of the AUA best practice statement.

Use of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Admission Due to Septic Shock after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have demonstrated that quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria may be more accurate than systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria to predict postoperative sepsis. In this study we evaluated the ability of these 2 criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study in 320 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a total of 8 institutions. The criteria for quick sequential organ failure assessment and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were collected 24 hours postoperatively. The study primary outcome was postoperative septic shock. Secondary outcomes included 30 and 90-day emergency department visits, and the hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: Three of the 320 patients (0.9%) met the criteria for postoperative septic shock. These 3 patients had positive criteria for quick sequential organ failure assessment and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Of the entire cohort 23 patients (7%) met quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria and 103 (32%) met systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. Specificity for postoperative sepsis was significantly higher for quick sequential organ failure assessment than for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (93.3% vs 68.4%, McNemar test p <0.001). The positive predictive value was 13% for quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria and 2.9% for systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria. On multivariate logistic regression systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria significantly predicted an increased probability of the patient receiving a transfusion (ß = 1.234, p <0.001). Positive quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria significantly predicted an increased probability of an emergency department visit within 30 days (ß = 1.495, p <0.05), operative complications (ß = 1.811, p <0.001) and transfusions (p <0.001). The main limitation of the study is that it was retrospective. CONCLUSIONS: Quick sequential organ failure assessment criteria were superior to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria to predict infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Outpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: The UC San Diego Health Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been described for highly selected patients. We sought to assess the safety and feasibility of outpatient PCNL in a tertiary referral stone center without strict patient selection criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all PCNLs performed at our institution from September 2015 to October 2016. Of the 97 eligible cases, 60 patients underwent planned outpatient PCNL. Primary outcome was complication rate, and secondary outcome determined predictor variables of inpatient admission. RESULTS: Thirty-seven inpatient and 60 planned outpatient (one bilateral) PCNLs were performed with 65% and 44% American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, respectively. The 30-day overall complication rate for the inpatient and planned outpatient groups was 27% and 20%, respectively (p = 0.43) [70% and 92% Clavien grades I-II]. Emergency department presentation within 30 days was 19% and 18% (p = 0.94), and unplanned hospital readmission rate was 3% and 10% (p = 0.05). The 37 inpatient PCNL patients had larger total stone burden than outpatient cases (40.7 vs 25.8 mm, p = 0.0014); more often required two or more punctures into the kidney during the procedure (73% vs 45%, p = 0.025); and more often had supracostal access (20% vs 7%, p = 0.05). For the outpatient PCNL cohort, 72% patients were discharged same day, 28% were observed overnight for refractory symptoms or social reasons. Outpatient cohort radiographic stone-free rate by CT (no stones) was 67%. CONCLUSION: Outpatient PCNL has been safely and effectively performed within our institution in moderate-sized stones almost regardless of comorbidity status. We suggest that this approach is a potential algorithmic change in centers with sufficient case volume.