A practical approach to imaging the axilla.

Imaging of the axilla typically occurs when patients present with axillary symptoms or newly diagnosed breast cancer. An awareness of the axillary anatomy is essential in order to generate an accurate differential diagnosis and guide patient management. The purpose of this article is to review the indications for axillary imaging, discuss the logistics of the scanning technique and percutaneous interventions, and present the imaging findings and management of a variety of breast diseases involving the axilla. Teaching points • Knowledge of normal axillary anatomy aids in determining the aetiology of an axillary mass. • The differential diagnosis of an axillary mass is broad and can be subdivided by the location of the lesion. • Imaging evaluation of the axilla usually entails diagnostic mammography and targeted ultrasound. • FNA or core needle biopsies are safe and accurate methods for diagnosis and guiding management.

Subcarinal collection following mediastinoscopy: a normal post-procedural CT finding.

AIM: To determine the frequency with which a subcarinal collection is present at computed tomography (CT) following mediastinoscopy and to determine the CT features of the collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent uncomplicated mediastinoscopy during a 1-year period were retrospectively identified. This list was cross-referenced to determine those patients who also underwent CT within 15 days after the procedure. Each post-mediastinoscopy CT examination was assessed in consensus by three fellowship-trained thoracic radiologists for the presence of subcarinal abnormalities, which were also characterized in terms of their size and density. Additional CT findings were recorded, including tracheobronchial wall thickening, paratracheal collections, mediastinal fat stranding, and mediastinal air. RESULTS: The study cohort included 10 patients (seven men and three women) with mean age of 65 years (range 49-81 years). CT was performed a mean of 11 days following mediastinoscopy. The most common CT finding was an oval subcarinal collection in nine of 10 cases (size 1.1-3.2 cm). In all nine cases, the subcarinal collections were consistently lower in attenuation than the subcarinal lymph node in the same region on the pre-procedure CT examination. Other CT findings included anterior tracheobronchial wall thickening (n=7); paratracheal collection (n=6); mediastinal fat stranding (n=6); and mediastinal air in (n=4) cases. CONCLUSION: A subcarinal collection was identified in 90% of cases following mediastinoscopy. Its rapid development and characteristic appearance help to distinguish it from a lymph node.