Specific Circular RNA Signature of Endothelial Cells: Potential Implications in Vascular Pathophysiology.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a recently characterized family of gene transcripts forming a covalently closed loop of single-stranded RNA. The extent of their potential for fine-tuning gene expression is still being discovered. Several studies have implicated certain circular RNAs in pathophysiological processes within vascular endothelial cells and cancer cells independently. However, to date, no comparative study of circular RNA expression in different types of endothelial cells has been performed and analysed through the lens of their central role in vascular physiology and pathology. In this work, we analysed publicly available and original RNA sequencing datasets from arterial, veinous, and lymphatic endothelial cells to identify common and distinct circRNA expression profiles. We identified 4713 distinct circRNAs in the compared endothelial cell types, 95% of which originated from exons. Interestingly, the results show that the expression profile of circular RNAs is much more specific to each cell type than linear RNAs, and therefore appears to be more suitable for distinguishing between them. As a result, we have discovered a specific circRNA signature for each given endothelial cell type. Furthermore, we identified a specific endothelial cell circRNA signature that is composed four circRNAs: circCARD6, circPLXNA2, circCASC15 and circEPHB4. These circular RNAs are produced by genes that are related to endothelial cell migration pathways and cancer progression. More detailed studies of their functions could lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in physiological and pathological (lymph)angiogenesis and might open new ways to tackle tumour spread through the vascular system.

High Level of Staufen1 Expression Confers Longer Recurrence Free Survival to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Promoting THBS1 mRNA Degradation.

Stau1 is a pluripotent RNA-binding protein that is responsible for the post-transcriptional regulation of a multitude of transcripts. Here, we observed that lung cancer patients with a high Stau1 expression have a longer recurrence free survival. Strikingly, Stau1 did not impair cell proliferation in vitro, but rather cell migration and cell adhesion. In vivo, Stau1 depletion favored tumor progression and metastases development. In addition, Stau1 depletion strongly impaired vessel maturation. Among a panel of candidate genes, we specifically identified the mRNA encoding the cell adhesion molecule Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) as a new target for Staufen-mediated mRNA decay. Altogether, our results suggest that regulation of THBS1 expression by Stau1 may be a key process involved in lung cancer progression.

[Do circular RNAs play tricks on us?] / L'ARN circulaire nous joue-t-il des tours ?

RNA has not said its last word with the rise of a new RNA family, circular RNAs (circRNAs). Discovered 25 years ago, circRNAs were initially considered as splicing byproducts. Today it appears that 14% of human genes produce circRNAs, whereas more than 100 000 different circRNAs are expressed. They are produced from coding genes through an alternative splicing mechanism called backsplicing, where an acceptor site is linked with a donor site located downstream. Nuclear circRNAs regulate transcription and splicing of their linear isoform. Cytoplasmic circRNAs, which are predominant, either sequester miRNAs or RNA binding proteins, or are translated via internal initiation mechanisms. CircRNAs may constitute a powerful biotechnogical tool for protein synthesis, as their translation is stable over time. In addition, exogenous circRNAs generate less immune response than their linear counterparts. We will also discuss in this review their biotechnological potential and their roles in pathological processes.

TITLE: L'ARN circulaire nous joue-t-il des tours ? ABSTRACT: L'ARN n'a pas dit son dernier mot… avec l'émergence des ARN circulaires (circARN). Quatorze pour cent des gènes humains produisent en effet des circARN par un mécanisme d'épissage alternatif : le rétro-épissage. Chez l'homme, plus de 100 000 circARN différents ont ainsi été répertoriés. Dans le noyau, ils régulent la transcription ou l'épissage des ARNm, alors que, dans le cytoplasme, ils séquestrent des miARN et des protéines, ou sont traduits par un mécanisme d'initiation interne de la traduction. Ces circARN constituent en fait un outil biotechnologique performant car leur traduction est très stable dans le temps, et les circARN exogènes induisent moins de réponses immunitaires que les ARNm linéaires. Dans cette revue, nous discuterons, après les avoir décrits, du rôle des circARN dans différents processus pathologiques et de leur utilisation en biotechnologie.

How are circRNAs translated by non-canonical initiation mechanisms?

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are covalently closed RNA loops produced by a very large number of expressed eukaryotic genes. Initially considered as splicing background and/or splicing side products, recent studies have shown that they are evolutionary conserved and abundant in cells. Yet, their functions remain largely unknown. Because of their circular shape, they were initially categorized as non-coding RNAs. However, recent studies based on mass spectrometry analysis indicate that some cytoplasmic circRNAs are effectively translated into detectable peptides. This raises the interesting question of which mechanisms regulate the translation initiation of those circular transcripts, i.e. unable to recruit the small ribosome subunit through the 5' cap. A possible mechanism for alternative translation initiation is the presence of an IRES (Internal Ribosome Entry Site) that allows direct recruitment of initiation factors and ribosomes on the RNA independently from the cap. This is the case for several circRNAs that exhibit IRESs upstream from the start codon. Yet, another process seems to be involved in initiating the translation of circRNAs: the presence of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) residues. These m6A can promote cap-independent translation and have been shown to be enriched in circRNAs. Interestingly, these two alternative translation initiation processes are generally activated under cellular stress to allow expression of specific stress response genes. These discoveries therefore link circRNA translation to cellular response to stress conditions, raising new enquiries about the regulation of circRNA expression under stress conditions and their functions. This review provides a state of the art on this emerging area.