Retention of rural family physicians after 20-25 years: outcomes of a comprehensive medical school rural program.

BACKGROUND: The Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College (JMC) is one of a small number of comprehensive medical school rural programs that has been successful in increasing the supply of family physicians practicing in rural areas. Although retention is a critical component of the rural physician supply, published long-term outcomes are limited. METHODS: Of the 1937 JMC graduates from the classes of 1978 to 1986, we identified those who were practicing family medicine in a rural county when they were first located in practice (in 1986 for 1978-1981 graduates and in 1991 for 1982-1986 graduates). Using the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, we then compared the numbers of PSAP and non-PSAP graduates who were still practicing family medicine in the same area in 2011. RESULTS: Of the 92 JMC graduates initially practicing rural family medicine, 90 were alive in 2011, and specialty and location data were available for 89 (98.9%). Of the 37 PSAP graduates who originally practiced rural family medicine, 26 (70.3%) were still practicing family medicine in the same rural area in 2011 compared with 24 of 52 non-PSAP graduates (46.2%; P = .02). CONCLUSION: This study provides additional support for the substantial impact of medical school rural programs, suggesting that graduates of rural programs are not only likely to enter rural family medicine but to remain in rural practice for decades.

Electronic clinical decision support for management of depression in primary care: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of an electronic clinical decision support tool for management of depression in primary care. METHOD: This prospective study was conducted in a national network of ambulatory practices over a 1-year period (October 2007-October 2008). A clinical decision support tool was embedded into the electronic health record of 19 primary care practices with 119 providers. The main components included (1) the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with 9 questions paralleling the 9 DSM-IV criteria for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder; (2) a suicide assessment form; and (3) brief patient and provider education. Use of each component was tracked in the electronic health record. Providers completed baseline and postintervention surveys regarding their depression management practices and their perceptions of the clinical decision support tool. RESULTS: According to electronic health record tracking, the PHQ-9 form was used in 45.6% of the 16,052 adult patients with depression and in 73.7% of the 1,422 patients with new depression. The suicide assessment form was used in 62.0% of patients with possible suicidality. Education modules were rarely used. From before to after the study, providers reported increased use of standardized tools for depression diagnosis (47% to 80%, P < .001) and monitoring (27% to 85%, P < .001). The majority of providers reported often using the PHQ-9 and suicide forms and felt them to be very helpful in patient care, with 85% planning to continue their use after the study. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic health record-based clinical decision support tool was extensively used and perceived as very helpful for assessment of patients' symptoms but not for provider education. These findings can help guide national efforts incorporating clinical decision support for quality improvement.

The relationship between matriculating medical students' planned specialties and eventual rural practice outcomes.

PURPOSE: To analyze the previously unknown relationships between the specialty plans of entering medical students and their eventual rural practice outcomes. METHOD: For 5,419 graduates from the 1978-2002 classes of Jefferson Medical College, their self-reported specialty plans at the time of matriculation were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, as were their 2007 practice locations. Specialty plans were grouped into 12 categories, and the percentages of graduates initially planning each specialty group who were actually practicing in rural areas were determined. RESULTS: Entering medical students' specialty plans were strongly related to eventual rural practice (P < .001). Those students planning family medicine were "highly likely" to practice in rural areas (29.4%, 238/810). They were 1.5 times as likely to practice rural as a "mid-likely" group (those planning general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, general internal medicine, or one of the medical subspecialties: 19.6% [range 17.9%-21.0%], 229/1,167). Students planning family medicine were also 2.1 times as likely to practice rural as those students planning a "lower-likely" group (those planning general pediatrics, one of the surgical subspecialties, the hospital specialties of radiology, anesthesiology and pathology, and obstetrics-gynecology, or other specialties: 14.0% [range 13.0%-14.3%], 142/1,016). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that students' specialty plans at medical school matriculation are significantly related to rural outcomes, and they provide new information quantifying the absolute and relative likelihood of those planning various specialties to enter rural practice. This information is particularly important for medical schools that have or plan to develop comprehensive rural programs.

The effects of a group visit program on outcomes of diabetes care in an urban family practice.

Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent chronic health condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Those with diabetes must acquire self-efficacy in the tasks necessary for them to successfully manage their disease. In this study, a controlled pre- and post-design was used to determine the effect of an adult support and education group visit program embedded in an urban academic family medicine practice on weight and the achievement of treatment goals for hemoglobin A1C, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) blood concentration, and blood pressure (BP) several months after it was implemented. Participants in the program were matched to a comparison group based on age, gender, race/ethnicity, and zip code group, a surrogate marker for socioeconomic status. The distribution of demographic characteristics and co-morbidities was similar between the groups. Significant increases occurred in the proportion of participants achieving both an A1C concentration <7% (CMH=4.6613, p = 0.0309) while controlling for baseline AIC concentration, and a BP<140/90 mm Hg (CMH=5.61, p = 0.018) controlling for baseline BP compared to the comparison group. The hemoglobin A1C concentration declined in 76.9% of the participants in the group visit program compared to 54.3% in the comparison group (CMH=8.9911, p = 0.0027). The increase in the proportion of group visit participants achieving the target LDL concentrations did not achieve statistical significance. The proportion of participants who lost weight was similar to that in the comparison group. Early experience with the program was encouraging and suggested it may improve patients' management of their diabetes mellitus in an urban, predominantly African American population.

The relationship between entering medical students' backgrounds and career plans and their rural practice outcomes three decades later.

PURPOSE: Although many studies have investigated predictors of physician practice in rural areas, few have accounted for the importance of physicians' backgrounds. This study analyzed the relationship between the backgrounds and future career plans of entering medical students and their rural practice outcomes. METHOD: For 1,111 graduates from Jefferson Medical College (JMC, classes of 1978-1982), three factors self-reported at matriculation and previously related to rural practice were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study of Medical Education: growing up rural, planning rural practice, and planning family medicine. Their 2007 practice location was determined to be in a rural versus nonrural area. Analyses of graduates with various numbers of predictive factors (0-3) and rural practice were performed. RESULTS: Of the 762 JMC graduates (69%) with complete data, 172 (23%) were practicing in rural areas. Of graduates with all three predictors, 45% (45/99) practiced in rural areas compared with 33% (48/145) of those with two predictors, 21% (42/198) with one predictor, and 12% (37/320) of those with none. Of physicians practicing in rural areas in 2007, only 22% had no predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Three factors known at the time of medical school matriculation have a powerful relationship with rural practice three decades later. Relatively few students without predictors practice in rural areas, which is particularly significant given subsequent factors known to be related to rural practice--for instance, rural curriculum, residency location, or spouse. These results have major implications for the role of the medical school admissions process in producing rural physicians.

Medical school rural programs: a comparison with international medical graduates in addressing state-level rural family physician and primary care supply.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive medical school rural programs (RPs) have made demonstrable contributions to the rural physician workforce, but their relative impact is uncertain. This study compares rural primary care practice outcomes for RP graduates within relevant states with those of international medical graduates (IMGs), also seen as ameliorating rural physician shortages. METHOD: Using data from the 2010 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, the authors identified all 1,757 graduates from three RPs (Jefferson Medical College's Physician Shortage Area Program; University of Minnesota Medical School Duluth; University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford's Rural Medical Education Program) practicing in their respective states, and all 6,474 IMGs practicing in the same states and graduating the same years. The relative likelihoods of RP graduates versus IMGs practicing rural family medicine and rural primary care were compared. RESULTS: RP graduates were 10 times more likely to practice rural family medicine than IMGs (relative risk [RR] = 10.0, confidence interval [CI] 8.7-11.6, P < .001) and almost 4 times as likely to practice any rural primary care specialty (RR 3.8, CI 3.5-4.2, P < .001). Overall, RPs produced more rural family physicians than the IMG cohort (376 versus 254). CONCLUSIONS: Despite their relatively small size, RPs had a significant impact on rural family physician and primary care supply compared with the much larger cohort of IMGs. Wider adoption of the RP model would substantially increase access to care in rural areas compared with increasing reliance on IMGs or unfocused expansion of traditional medical schools.

Increasing the supply of women physicians in rural areas: outcomes of a medical school rural program.

BACKGROUND: Women physicians are less likely then men to practice in rural areas. With women representing an increasing proportion of physicians, there is concern that this could exacerbate the rural physician shortage. The Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP) of Jefferson Medical College (JMC) is one of a small number of medical school rural programs shown to be successful in addressing the rural physician shortage; however, little is known about their specific impact on women. METHODS: For 2394 physicians from the 1992 to 2002 JMC graduating classes, the 2007 practice location and specialty for PSAP and non-PSAP graduates were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study. The relative likelihood of PSAP versus non-PSAP graduates practicing in rural areas was determined for women and men and compared. RESULTS: Women PSAP graduates were more than twice as likely as non-PSAP women to practice in rural areas (31.7% vs 12.3%; relative risk, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2). This was similar to the PSAP outcomes for men (51.8% vs 17.7%; relative risk, 2.9, 95% CI, 2.2-3.9; relative risk ratio, 0.9, 95% CI, 0.5-1.5). PSAP outcomes were also similar for women and men practicing rural family medicine and rural primary care. CONCLUSION: These results provide support that medical school rural programs have the potential to help address the serious shortage of women physicians in rural areas, thereby increasing access to care for those living there.

Family factors in end-of-life decision-making: family conflict and proxy relationship.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined proxy decision-making regarding end-of-life treatment decisions. Proxy accuracy is defined as whether proxy treatment choices are consistent with the expressed wishes of their index elder. The purpose of this study was to examine proxy accuracy in relation to two family factors that may influence proxy accuracy: perceived family conflict and type of elder-proxy relationship. METHODS: Telephone interviews with 202 community-dwelling elders and their proxy decision makers were conducted including the Life-Support Preferences Questionnaire (LSPQ), and a measure of family conflict, and sociodemographic characteristics, including type of relationship. RESULTS: Elder-proxy accuracy was associated with the type of elder-proxy relationship. Adult children demonstrated the lowest elder-proxy accuracy and spousal proxies the highest elder-proxy accuracy. Elder-proxy accuracy was associated with family conflict. Proxies reporting higher family conflict had lower elder-proxy accuracy. No interaction between family conflict and relationship type was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Spousal proxies were more accurate in their substituted judgment than adult children, and proxies who perceive higher degree of family conflict tended to be less accurate than those with lower family conflict. Health care providers should be aware of these family factors when discussing advance care planning.

Impact of EHR-based clinical decision support on adherence to guidelines for patients on NSAIDs: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Electronic health records (EHRs) with clinical decision support hold promise for improving quality of care, but their impact on management of chronic conditions has been mixed. This study examined the impact of EHR-based clinical decision support on adherence to guidelines for reducing gastrointestinal complications in primary care patients on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a national network of primary care offices using an EHR and focused on patients taking traditional NSAIDs who had factors associated with a high risk for gastrointestinal complications (a history of peptic ulcer disease; concomitant use of anticoagulants, anti-platelet medications [including aspirin], or corticosteroids; or an age of 75 years or older). The offices were randomized to receive EHR-based guidelines and alerts for high-risk patients on NSAIDs, or usual care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received guideline-concordant care during the 1-year study period (June 2007-June 2008), defined as having their traditional NSAID discontinued (including a switch to a lower-risk medication), having a gastroprotective medication coprescribed, or both. RESULTS: Participants included 27 offices with 119 clinicians and 5,234 high-risk patients. Intervention patients were more likely than usual care patients to receive guideline-concordant care (25.4% vs 22.4%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.42). For individual high-risk groups, patients on low-dose aspirin were more likely to receive guideline-concordant care with the intervention vs usual care (25.0% vs 20.8%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.62), but there was no significant difference for patients in other high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed only a small impact of EHR-based clinical decision support for high-risk patients on NSAIDs in primary care offices. These results add to the growing literature about the complexity of EHR-based clinical decision support for improving quality of care.

Beyond grand rounds: a comprehensive and sequential intervention to improve identification of delirium.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Delirium is a widespread concern for hospitalized seniors, yet is often unrecognized. A comprehensive and sequential intervention (CSI) aiming to effect change in clinician behavior by improving knowledge about delirium was tested. DESIGN AND METHODS: A 2-day CSI program that consisted of progressive 4-part didactic series, including evidence-based reviews of delirium recognition, prevention, and management, interspersed with interactive small group sessions and practical case conferences was conceptualized in consultation with a leading expert on delirium. Pretest and posttest instruments were designed to test the attendees on their knowledge and confidence around delirium identification. RESULTS: An average of 71 people attended each didactic session. Among all responses, 50 pretests and posttests were matched based on numeric coding (6 MD/DOs, 34 RNs, and 10 others). Mean pretest and posttest scores were 7.9 and 10.8 points, respectively (maximum: 17), showing a positive change in knowledge scores after the intervention (2.9 points, p < .001). Improvement in knowledge scores was higher in the cohort attending 2 or more lectures (3.8 points, p < .001) compared with those attending only 1 lecture (1.3 points, p < .12). Confidence in identifying patients with delirium increased by 28% (p < .001), and self-assessed capacity to correctly administer the Confusion Assessment Method increased by 36% (p < .001). IMPLICATIONS: A novel CSI increased clinician knowledge about delirium identification and management and improved confidence and self-assessed capacity to identify delirium in the hospitalized elderly patients. This strategy, which incorporates multiple reinforcing modes of education, may ultimately be more effective in influencing clinician behavior when compared with traditional grand rounds.

Health beliefs and their associations with dietary intake, exercise, and metabolic syndrome characteristics in an overweight and obese family medicine population.

Increasing prevalences of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) increase cardiovascular risks. Since poor diet and inadequate exercise are primary behavioral causes of obesity and T2DM, our objective was to examine health beliefs and associations with diet, exercise, and metabolic syndrome (MetSyndr) characteristics. A total of 117 overweight and obese family medicine patients enrolled in this study. Subjects completed questionnaires for health beliefs and vegetable, fruit, and fat intake; other data were from medical charts. Seventy-four percent of subjects were women; 69% were black, 72% were obese, 36% were hypertensive, 22% had T2DM, and 23% had hypertriglyceridemia. MetSyndr subjects had significantly higher triglyceride levels and a higher percentage of hypertension and T2DM. Although not statistically significant, overweight subjects without MetSyndr had higher vegetable and fruit intake and lower fat intake than obese subjects without MetSyndr and subjects with MetSyndr. More exercise was associated with less MetSyndr and less obesity; however, this also was not statistically significant. For health beliefs, there were no significant differences between subjects with MetSyndr versus those without MetSyndr or for subjects without MetSyndr who were obese versus those who were overweight. However, for subjects with above-median nutrition scores and exercise, scores were significantly higher for the health belief "certainty" compared to those with below-median scores (P < .0001). This research suggests that health beliefs and specifically less certainty may be a useful marker for individuals who require more education and/or training. Effective programs that address certainty may promote better diets, more exercise, and reduced cardiovascular risk.

Increasing the supply of rural family physicians: recent outcomes from Jefferson Medical College's Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP).

PURPOSE: The shortage of primary care physicians in rural areas is an enduring problem with serious implications for access to care. Although studies have previously shown that medical school rural programs-such as Jefferson Medical College's Physician Shortage Area Program (PSAP)-significantly increase the rural workforce, determining whether these programs continue to be successful is important. METHOD: The authors obtained, from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, the 2007 practice location and specialty for the 2,394 PSAP and non-PSAP graduates of 11 previously unreported Jefferson graduating classes (1992-2002). They determined the relative likelihood both of PSAP versus non-PSAP graduates practicing rural family medicine and of all PSAP versus non-PSAP graduates practicing in Pennsylvania's rural counties. RESULTS: PSAP graduates were much more likely both to practice rural family medicine than their non-PSAP peers (32.0% [31/97] versus 3.2% [65/2,004]; relative risk [RR] = 9.9, confidence interval [CI] 6.8-14.4, P < .001) and to practice any specialty in rural Pennsylvania (PSAP 24.7% [24/97] versus non-PSAP 2.0% [40/2,004]; RR = 12.4, CI 7.8-19.7, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite major changes in health care in recent decades, Jefferson's PSAP continues to represent a successful model for substantially increasing the supply and distribution of rural family physicians. Especially with the forthcoming expansion in health insurance, access to care for rural residents will require an increased supply of providers. These results may also be important for medical schools planning to develop similar rural programs, given the new Rural Physician Training Grants program.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in elderly: assessing doctor knowledge, confidence and barriers.

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate medication prescribing by doctors is an important preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. This study investigates doctor knowledge about potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in elderly, their confidence in prescribing for the elderly and explores perceived barriers. METHODS: Family and Internal Medicine resident and attending doctors at three teaching hospitals were asked to complete a survey. Six clinical vignettes based on the 2003 Beers criteria were used to evaluate doctor knowledge about medications to avoid in the elderly. Confidence in prescribing for the elderly and perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing in elderly was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Eighty-nine doctors completed the survey, for a response rate of 45%. Forty-four per cent of surveyed doctors estimated that over 25% of their practice consisted of patients 65 years or older. When knowledge of PIP was assessed via vignettes, the mean correct response was 3.9 (SD: 1.1, min = 1, max = 6). Only 14% of those doctors scoring ≤4 vignettes correctly had used the Beers criteria for prescribing; 31% of the doctors answering ≥5 vignettes correctly had used the Beers criteria (P = 0.08). Overall, 75% of doctors felt confident about their prescribing irrespective of their knowledge scores. Seventy per cent of surveyed doctors cited at least seven different barriers to appropriate prescribing in elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Many primary care doctors possess a poor knowledge of PIP and are unaware of prescribing guidelines such as the Beers criteria. Our survey indicates that doctor usage of the Beers criteria might correlate with improved judgement in prescribing for the elderly. Most doctors report multiple barriers to appropriate prescribing in the elderly. Lack of formal education about prescribing guidelines was the only barrier that correlated with the doctors' level of training.

Effectiveness of guideline-recommended cardiac drugs for reducing mortality in the elderly medicare heart failure population: a retrospective, survey-weighted, cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) management guidelines recommend that most patients with HF receive an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) and a ß-blocker (ß-adrenoceptor antagonist), collectively referred to as 'cardiac drugs', based on results from randomized controlled trials showing that these drugs reduce mortality. However, the results of randomized controlled trials may not be generalizable to the population most likely (i.e. the elderly) to receive these drugs in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of cardiac drugs for reducing mortality in the elderly Medicare HF population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, survey-weighted, cohort analysis of the 2002 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Cost and Use files. PARTICIPANTS: 12 697 beneficiaries, of whom 1062 had a diagnosis of HF and 577 were eligible to receive cardiac drugs. MEASUREMENTS: Association between mortality and cardiac drugs, adjusted for sociodemographics, co-morbidity and propensity to receive cardiac drugs. RESULTS: The mortality rate among the 577 eligible beneficiaries with HF was 9.7%. The mortality rate for those receiving an ACE inhibitor or ARB alone, a ß-blocker alone, or both an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a ß-blocker, was 6.1%, 5.9% and 5.3%, respectively; in the absence of any of the three cardiac drugs, the mortality rate was 20.0% (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, mortality rates remained significantly lower for beneficiaries receiving an ACE inhibitor or ARB alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.24; 95% CI 0.11, 0.50), a ß-blocker alone (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07, 0.41), or both an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a ß-blocker (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10, 0.55) compared with patients who did not receive any of the three cardiac drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of guideline-recommended cardiac drugs is associated with reduced mortality in the elderly Medicare HF population. Providing evidence of the benefit of cardiac drugs among the elderly with HF will become increasingly important as the size of the Medicare population grows.

An electronic medical record-based intervention to improve quality of care for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and atypical presentations of GERD.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in primary care but is often underdiagnosed and untreated. GERD can also present with atypical symptoms like chronic cough and asthma, and physicians may be unaware of this presentation. We aimed to implement and evaluate an intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment for GERD and atypical GERD in primary care. METHOD: This was a randomised controlled trial in primary care office practice using a national network of US practices (the Medical Quality Improvement Consortium - MQIC) that share the same electronic medical record (EMR). Thirteen offices with 53 providers were randomised to the intervention of EMR-based prompts and education, and 14 offices with 66 providers were randomised to the control group totalling over 67 000 patients and examining outcomes of GERD diagnosis and appropriate treatment. RESULTS: Among patients who did not have GERD at baseline, new diagnoses of GERD increased significantly in the intervention group (3.1%) versus the control group (2.3%) (P<0.01). This remained significant after controlling for clustering with an odds of diagnosis of 1.33 (95% CI 1.13-1.56) for the intervention group. For patients with atypical symptoms, those in the intervention group had both higher odds of being diagnosed with GERD (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.41-2.88) and of being treated for GERD (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.83) than those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: GERD diagnosis and treatment in primary care, particularly among patients with atypical symptoms, can be improved through the use of an EMR-based tool incorporating decision support and education. However, significant room for improvement exists in use of appropriate treatment.

Ask a different question, get a different answer: why living wills are poor guides to care preferences at the end of life.

CONTEXT: Living wills have a poor record of directing care at the end of life, as a copious literature attests. Some speculation centers on the questionable correspondence between the scenario described in living wills versus the real-life circumstances that typically arise at the end of life. OBJECTIVE: To assess the strength of association between responses to a standard living will question and preferences for treatments in six end-of-life scenarios. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred two community-dwelling men and women 70 years of age or older in the greater Philadelphia area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Strength of preferences for four life-sustaining treatments in each of six poor-health scenarios. RESULTS: Associations between responses to the standard living will question and preferences for treatment (means across the four) in six specific scenarios were statistically significant but modest in size, accounting for 23% of variance at most. The association for the worse-case scenario (severe stroke with coma) was significantly stronger than for any other association. CONCLUSIONS: The modest correspondence between living will responses and wishes for life-sustaining treatment in specific scenarios helps to elucidate the living will's poor performance. Presentation of more realistic end-of-life scenarios should improve the living will's ability to guide care, as well as preparing patients and families better for the end of life.

The Child Asthma Link Line: a coalition-initiated, telephone-based, care coordination intervention for childhood asthma.

BACKGROUND: Childhood asthma is a complex chronic disease that poses significant challenges regarding management, and there is evidence of disparities in care. Many medical, psychosocial, and health system factors contribute to recognized poor control of this most prevalent illness among children, with resultant excessive use of emergency departments and hospitalizations for care. Recent national guidelines emphasize the need for community-based initiatives to address these critical issues. To address health system fragmentation and impact asthma outcomes, the Philadelphia Allies Against Asthma coalition developed and implemented the Child Asthma Link Line, a telephone-based care coordination and system integration program, which has been in operation since 2001. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Child Asthma Link Line integration model to improve asthma management by measuring utilization markers of morbidity. METHODS: Medicaid Managed Care Organization claims data for 59 children who received the Link Line intervention in 2003 are compared to a matched sample of 236 children who did not receive the Link Line intervention. Children in the two study groups are ages 3 through 12 years and matched on 2003 emergency department visits, age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Primary outcome variables analyzed in this study are emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and office visit claims from the follow-up year (2004). RESULTS: Link Line intervention children were significantly less likely to have follow-up hospitalizations than matched sample children (p = .02). Children enrolled in the Link Line were also more likely to attend outpatient office visits in the follow-up year (p = .045). In addition, Link Line children with multiple emergency department visits in 2003 were significantly less likely to have an emergency department visit in 2004 (p = .046). CONCLUSION: This coalition-developed, telephone-based, system-level intervention had a significant impact on childhood asthma morbidity as measured by utilization endpoints of follow-up hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Telephone-based care coordination and service integration may be a viable and economic way to impact childhood asthma and other chronic diseases.

Do medical students correctly perceive what patients believe about their own health?

OBJECTIVE: This study set out to estimate the prevalence of any mismatch between medical students' perceptions of patients' health beliefs and those of a normative group of primary care patients. METHODS: A Perception of Health Scale, normed on 314 primary care patients and including four reproducible subscales based on Health Belief Model constructs, was distributed to 500 medical students in Years 3 and 4 at a private US medical school. The students were asked to indicate how a 'typical' patient they had seen with a preceptor or on a rotation might have answered. Responses were scored as matching or not matching the normative data. Group comparisons were made for gender, year of graduation, age and planned specialty. RESULTS: Depending on the subscale, at least 75% of the students' responses did not match those of the normative patient group. There were no consistent group differences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that medical students do not accurately perceive what patients believe about their own health. Whether this is true for residents and providers in practice remains unknown.

Impact of decision support in electronic medical records on lipid management in primary care.

Electronic decision-support tools may help to improve management of hyperlipidemia and other chronic diseases. This study examined the impact of lipid management tools integrated into an electronic medical record (EMR) in primary care practices. This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a national network of physicians who use an outpatient EMR. Adult primary care physicians were randomized by office to receive an electronic form that was embedded in the EMR. The form contained prompts regarding suboptimal care based on Adult Treatment Panel-III (ATP-III) guidelines, as well as reporting tools to identify patients outside of office visits whose lipid management was suboptimal. All active patients, ages 20-79 years, whose physicians participated in the study, were categorized as high, moderate, or low cardiovascular risk, and the proportion who were tested for hyperlipidemia, at lipid goal, and on lipid-lowering medications if not at goal were measured according to ATP-III guidelines. A total of 105 physicians from 25 offices and 64,150 patients were included in the study. Outcomes improved for most measures from before to 1 year after the intervention (November 1, 2005 to October 31, 2006). However, after controlling for confounding variables and for clustering in multilevel modeling, only up-to-date lipid testing for high-risk patients was statistically better in the intervention group as compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio 15.0, P < 0.05). This study showed few differences in quality of lipid management after implementing an EMR-based disease management intervention in primary care settings. Future studies may need to examine more comprehensive interventions that include office staff in a team approach to care.