Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am J Med Qual ; 33(1): 21-29, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28482161

ABSTRACT

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) cause major patient harm, preventable through attention to line care best practice standards. The objective was to determine if a digital self-assessment application (CLABSI App), bundling line care best practices with social gamification and in-context microlearning, could engage nurses in CLABSI prevention. Nurses caring for children with indwelling central venous catheters in 3 high-risk units were eligible to participate. All other units served as controls. The intervention was a 12-month nonrandomized quality improvement study of CLABSI App implementation with interunit competitions. Compared to the preceding year, the intervention group (9886 line days) CLABSI rate decreased by 48% ( P = .03). Controls (7879 line days) did not change significantly. In all, 105 unique intervention group nurses completed 673 self-assessments. Competitions were associated with increased engagement as measured by self-assessments and unique participants. This model could be extended to other health care-associated infections, and more broadly to process improvement within and across health care systems.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Inservice Training/methods , Mobile Applications , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Central Venous Catheters , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Humans , Patient Care Bundles , Prospective Studies , Self-Assessment , Work Engagement
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 193(5): 495-503, 2016 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26492410

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: The use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) for acute respiratory failure in children is prevalent despite the lack of efficacy data. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of patients with acute respiratory failure managed with HFOV within 24-48 hours of endotracheal intubation with those receiving conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and/or late HFOV. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the RESTORE (Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure) study, a prospective cluster randomized clinical trial conducted between 2009 and 2013 in 31 U.S. pediatric intensive care units. Propensity score analysis, including degree of hypoxia in the model, compared the duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality of patients treated with early HFOV matched with those treated with CMV/late HFOV. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 2,449 subjects enrolled in RESTORE, 353 patients (14%) were ever supported on HFOV, of which 210 (59%) had HFOV initiated within 24-48 hours of intubation. The propensity score model predicting the probability of receiving early HFOV included 1,064 patients (181 early HFOV vs. 883 CMV/late HFOV) with significant hypoxia (oxygenation index ≥ 8). The degree of hypoxia was the most significant contributor to the propensity score model. After adjusting for risk category, early HFOV use was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.89; P = 0.001) but not with mortality (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.79; P = 0.15) compared with CMV/late HFOV. CONCLUSIONS: In adjusted models including important oxygenation variables, early HFOV was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. These analyses make supporting the current approach to HFOV less convincing.


Subject(s)
High-Frequency Ventilation/methods , Hypoxia/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hypoxia/etiology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Odds Ratio , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/complications , Respiratory Insufficiency/complications , Time Factors
5.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 50(9): 807-15, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21525088

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based interprofessional team training is important to ensure high-quality, safe patient care, but several barriers exist, including diverging learning needs and schedules as well as limited available resources. METHODS: The authors developed an in situ, simulation-based interprofessional team training program around pediatric emergencies for physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists at their institution and performed an analysis of the program's impact on self-efficacy in resuscitation skills among pediatric residents and nurses. RESULTS: The results showed that with a design based in best principles of team training and simulation education, interprofessional team training is feasible and sustainable. The program had a beneficial effect on self-efficacy in resuscitation skills among both residents and nurses at the authors' institution and received widespread acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative approach to design and implementation of interprofessional team training can lead to a sustainable program that serves both patient safety and training requirements set forth by professional organizations.


Subject(s)
Education, Continuing/methods , Patient Care Team , Pediatrics/education , Resuscitation/education , Self Efficacy , Teaching/methods , Child , Clinical Competence , Education, Continuing/economics , Hospitals, Pediatric , Hospitals, University , Humans , Internship and Residency , Interprofessional Relations , Pediatric Nursing/education , San Francisco , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...