Determinants of left ventricular systolic function recovery after an acute coronary syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of heart failure in western societies. However, the factors that may influence left ventricular function (LVF) recovery after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify variables that may influence LVF evolution one year after ACS. METHODS: 104 patients hospitalized with ACS between 7/1/2001 and 12/31/2002 and with systolic dysfunction--defined as an echocardiographic ejection fraction (EF) < or = 45%--were randomly allocated to a planned coronary follow-up program (FUP) or a general cardiology clinic (GC); patients from both groups were also randomly referred to a structured cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP). EF was re-assessed at one year. We compared differences between patients who recovered left ventricular function (EF > 45%; group 1) and those who did not (group 2). RESULTS: One year after discharge, 44.2% of the patients had recovered function. There were no significant differences between the groups in gender (77.7 vs. 76.5% male), age (56 vs. 59 years), hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking habits or family history. A previous history of cardiovascular events was more frequent in group 2 (11.1% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.03). Cardiac catheterization was performed before discharge in 88.8% and 88.2% in groups 1 and 2 respectively (p = NS); no differences were found in coronary anatomy between the two groups. Angioplasty was performed in 54.2% in group 1 and 50% in group 2 (p = NS). There were no differences in the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (83.3% vs. 87.5%), beta-blockers (87.5% vs. 87.5%), nitrates (37.5% vs. 33.3%), aspirin (95.8% vs. 95.8%), statins (79.1% vs. 75%) or diuretics (20.8% vs. 45.8%). There was no significant difference in LVF recovery between patients randomized to FUP or GC (38.5% vs. 54.5%). 87.5% of patients who completed the CRP had normal EF at one year compared to 32.7% of patients not referred to the program (p = 0.009). Although EF improved in both groups, this improvement was greater in patients who completed a CRP (EF 8% vs. 5%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: A previous cardiovascular event and completion of a CRP were the only variables that influenced LVF recovery. Thus, enrollment in a CRP, in addition to standard therapy, could be an important therapeutic measure in patients with systolic dysfunction after ACS; our data suggest that these programs should be more widely used.

Acute coronary syndrome and predictors of quality of life.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary disease in its various forms of presentation is associated with a reduction in the patients' own perception of their quality of life (QoL). QoL is an important measure of effectiveness of treatment; however, the predictors of QoL after admission for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are not completely clear. AIM: To identify the clinical, demographic and psychosocial characteristics of patients admitted for ACS that were predictive of QoL in clinical follow-up. METHODS: Physical and mental QoL were prospectively evaluated in 278 patients admitted for ACS, using Short Form-36 v2 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scales. Based on the median PCS (55) and MCS (56) scores, the population was divided into two groups. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory. RESULTS: The patients with a better QoL perception were male, young, smokers and had more than 12 years' education. A greater proportion of patients with PCS and MCS below the median score presented prior cardiovascular events and depressive symptoms. A worse physical QoL perception was more common in unmarried, hypertensive and diabetic patients. There was no association between clinical evolution or in-hospital complications and baseline QoL scores. Baseline PCS and MCS were 55 +/- 24 and 55 +/- 27 and at 16 months, 63 +/- 25 and 66 +/- 29. Clinical follow-up was achieved in 181 patients. A worse mental QoL perception at follow-up was related to female gender, baseline MCS < 56 and depressive symptoms. A PCS below median score at follow-up was more frequent in women and in patients with prior cardiovascular events, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and a lower level of education. Patients with better physical QoL at follow-up were smokers, presented higher baseline PCS and MCS, and had fewer depressive symptoms. Percutaneous myocardial revascularization was associated with a better physical QoL. In a logistic regression model the independent predictors of PCS were: gender, baseline PCS, level of education and prior cardiovascular events. Gender and depressive symptoms were independent predictors of MCS. CONCLUSIONS: In the study population, baseline clinical and psychosocial characteristics were the most important predictors of QoL after ACS. Depression was associated with worse mental QoL. In-hospital evolution and treatment did not appear to strongly affect patients' follow-up perceptions of QoL.

Left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction--the impact of cardiovascular risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular (LV) systolic function is an important prognostic factor in coronary heart disease. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) should be assessed in all patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although reperfusion therapy has been found effective in the reduction of complications of AMI, LVEF impairment is a common consequence of an acute coronary event. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of LVEF depression after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to evaluate the effect of previous cardiovascular risk factors on the risk of LV dysfunction. METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with a first STEMI were included in this study. Most patients were male (70.7%) and mean age was 60.7 years. LVEF was assessed by echocardiography (using the single-plane area-length method and automatic border detection). LV systolic function was considered depressed when ejection fraction was less than 45 %. The chi-square test was used in the statistical analysis to compare proportions and a logistic regression model was fitted to assess the independent effect of each variable. RESULTS: Incidence of LV dysfunction was 55.8% in STEMI patients. No association was found between gender or age and LVEF impairment. The proportion of patients with diabetes was higher in the impaired LVEF group than in normal LVEF patients (44.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.12); the prevalence of smoking was also higher in patients with LV dysfunction (46.9% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.11). On the other hand, dyslipidemia was less common in patients with depressed LV function (35.4% vs. 56.9%, p = 0.01). Hypertension was not associated with impaired LVEF. After adjustment for ST-elevation location and number of vessels with critical stenosis, diabetes and smoking were associated with a significantly higher risk of LVEF impairment (diabetes: OR = 3.73, 95% CI 1.25-11.16; smoking: OR = 3.9, 95% CI 1.37-11.07) and dyslipidemia with a significantly lower risk of LV dysfunction (OR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients, previous cardiovascular risk factors have a significant impact on the likelihood of LV dysfunction and hence could influence long-term prognosis.

Acute coronary syndrome and depression.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical depression is associated with poor compliance in risk reduction recommendations and has been suggested as an independent risk factor for increased postmyocardial infarction morbidity and mortality. AIM: To determine the prevalence of depressive symptoms, their main determinants and their influence on clinical evolution in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients. METHODS: We studied depressive symptoms, sociodemographic variables, cardiovascular status and therapeutic procedures in 240 consecutive patients admitted for ACS. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) after clinical stabilization, in patients with more than 4 years' education. RESULTS: The majority of the patients were male (203); their average age was 59.4 +/- 13 yrs; 31.8% were admitted for unstable angina, 33.1% for acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation and 31.8% without ST elevation. Depressive symptoms (BDI > or =10) were present in 100 patients (41.6%). Depressed patients were older (61.1 vs. 58.2 years, p = 0.06) and had a history of previous cardiovascular events /47.5 vs. (34.8% p = 0.05). The proportion of female was higher in the group of patients with BDI > or =10 (24% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.02). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were not associated with depressive symptoms. There were no statistically significant differences between the depressed and non-depressed patients in admission diagnosis, in-hospital clinical evolution and treatment. There were 35 patients (14.6%) with moderate/severe depression (BDI > or =19), 12 of whom were women (OR = 3.8, p = 0.001); no relation was established between age and previous cardiac events. These scores were less frequent in patients with a higher level of education (OR = 0.28, p = 0.09) and married (OR = 0.31 vs. not married, p = 0.03). Clinical follow-up of 158 patients was achieved (16 +/- 4 months), in patients with BDI > or =19, the presence of cardiovascular symptoms (angina, congestive heart failure) was higher (46% vs. 23%, OR = 2.8, p = 0.03), even after adjustment for age (OR = 2.5; p = 0.06). However, there was no association between the presence of depressive symptoms and readmission and/or fatal events. CONCLUSION: Depression is a common finding after hospital admission for ACS, particularly in women, and is mainly associated with prehospital factors. In our group of patients, the presence of depressive symptoms was closely related to clinical status during follow-up.

Impact of a structured intensive follow-up program on the control of hypertension in coronary patients--a randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular events. Although several anti-hypertensive agents have shown to be effective in the treatment of hypertension, adequate blood pressure control is not frequent in most populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a structured intensive follow-up program (SIFUP) on the control of blood pressure in coronary patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: we performed a prospective, randomized study including 237 patients admitted to the Cardiology Department for acute coronary syndrome. Patients were randomly assigned to a SIFUP (n=129) or to the general cardiology outpatient department (COD) (n=108). An experienced doctor performed a blind assessment of blood pressure in 157 randomised patients, 9 to 18 months after discharge. In statistical analysis, the chi-square test was used to compare proportions and the Student's t test to compare means. RESULTS: Both groups were predominantly male and mean age was similar. The proportion of patients with known hypertension randomised to the SIFUP and the COD did not differ. At the 9 to 18-month assessment there was no statistical significant difference in the proportion of patients with blood pressure under target values (57.5% in SIFUP and 48.5% in COD, p=NS). However, in hypertensive patients, the proportion of controlled patients was significantly higher in the SIFUP than in the COD (44.8% vs. 24.2%, p=0.05) and systolic and mean blood pressure were significantly lower in the SIFUP (respectively 139.0 vs. 148.8 mmHg, p=0.04 and 98.7 vs. 103.9 mmHg, p=0.03); diastolic blood pressure was also lower in SIFUP (78.5 vs. 81.5 mmHg, p=NS). CONCLUSIONS: The SIFUP has shown to be effective in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive coronary patients. The proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure was consistently higher in the SIFUP.

Value of fractional flow reserve in the management of patients with moderate coronary stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: A considerable number of patients present a single intermediate lesion (>40% and <70%) in one coronary artery on coronary angiography, with no clear evidence that the lesion is responsible for the patient's symptoms. Fractional flow reserve is a method of evaluating the functional importance of stenosis, a value of <0.75 indicating hemodynamically significant lesions. The aim of this study is to determine the safety of non-revascularization of an angiographically moderate and hemodynamically non-significant lesion. METHODS: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) was evaluated in 87 patients over a period of 34 months. Retrospective analysis and follow-up were conducted of patients referred for coronary angiography, without acute coronary syndrome, who presented an angiographically moderate lesion of a single epicardial coronary artery with an FFR of 0.75, and in whom intervention was deferred. RESULTS: We found 21 patients with a mean age of 66 years, 66.7% male. All patients presented vascular risk factors, 14 with prior cardiovascular events. Before coronary angiography 7 patients were asymptomatic, 7 had atypical symptoms and 7 presented CCS class 2 angina. Among these patients, 16 performed a non-invasive stress test, which was positive in 11 patients and inconclusive or doubtful in the others. Angiographically most of the lesions were located in the left anterior descending artery (12 patients). In the 19 +/- 12-month follow-up, 16 patients were asymptomatic and the others maintained the same symptoms. There was no change in the amount of antianginal drugs prescribed. No cardiac events occurred. CONCLUSION: FFR is a useful tool when clinical symptoms and non-invasive tests are inconclusive in the presence of moderate stenosis in a coronary artery. In our group of patients, the decision to defer intervention based on an FFR of 0.75 was found to be safe and associated with absence of clinical events.

[Myocardial revascularization surgery, depressive symptoms and labeling effect]. / Cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica, sintomas depressivos e efeito rotulação.

INTRODUCTION: The individual awareness of one's own disease, the so called labeling effect, may result in a reduction of one's sense of perceived health. In patients submitted to coronary artery bypass surgery it has been reported that the diagnosis of depression is associated with a higher rate of hospitalization and it's an independent risk factor for cardiac events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the modification of depressive symptoms induced by the information of medical indication for myocardial revascularization surgery. METHODS: We studied the presence of depressive symptoms, socio-demographic variables, cardiovascular status and therapeutic procedures in two groups of consecutive patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome. In the labeled group the BDI-1 was performed after clinical stabilization and the BDI-2 after the information of myocardial revascularization surgery need. In the control group the BDI-1 was answered after clinical stabilization and the BDI-2 48-72 hours later. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the difference of depressive symptoms between the groups. RESULTS: Distribution by age, marital status and education level was similar between the two groups. The cardiovascular risk profile was alike. The difference between BDI-1 and BDI-2 was significantly higher in the labeled group (4.6-/+4.2 vs 0.8-/+3.2; p=0.005). There were no significant differences between the final diagnosis (unstable angina in the labeled group 50% vs control group 45.5%; AMI without Q wave 30% vs 27.3%; AMI with Q wave 20% vs 27.3%) and in hospital clinical evolution. CONCLUSION: The individual awareness of the need to coronary bypass surgery was associated with a clinical and statistical significant increase of depressive symptoms. Hence, routine evaluation of depressive symptoms as a part of a preoperative protocol, may allow identification of the patients, who may benefit from therapeutic intervention.