ABSTRACT
This article describes the case of a 73-year-old patient with grade 3 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced enteritis. Five different immunosuppressive agents (glucocorticoids, high-dose infliximab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and vedolizumab) were administered, however, with no clinical or radiographical benefit. A laparotomy was performed, as the patient showed signs of intestinal obstruction, with a segmental resection of the ileal loop. Biopsy results showed multiple fibrotic strictures. The current treatment guidelines for ICI enterocolitis only include drugs as a treatment option. Nevertheless, it remains important to consider early surgical intervention in order to avoid serious complications due to persistent and pronounced inflammation. The current case highlights the importance of surgery as a treatment modality in the multidisciplinary approach for ICI-induced enteritis, which should be taken into consideration after second- or third-line treatment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Technology-based interventions are increasingly being introduced in routine clinical cancer care. There is a need for reliable systems to monitor treatment-related toxicity in a standardized manner. Such electronic tools bridge the gap in providing quality home-based monitoring. METHODS: From July 2017 to December 2017, we performed a multicentered, non-randomized prospective cohort analysis with patients who were receiving routine chemotherapy for various solid tumors, using a web-based patient-reported toxicity registration, management, and intervention system called AMTRA (ambulatory Monitoring of cancer Therapy using an interactive Application) linked to the homecare nursing organization Remedus®. Twelve common toxicities plus pain and two biometrics could be registered daily or more frequently as required. These were processed centrally to generate tailored advice for lesser symptoms or a phone call from a dedicated nurse in case of severe or prolonged toxicity. A compliance tool to monitor oral therapies was incorporated in the system. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients (92%) were enrolled, with 31,514 registrations analyzed. One hundred eight patients reported severe toxicity (> 1461 registrations), resulting in 102 clinical interventions ranging from self-management advice, supplemental consultations to hospitalizations. Compliance to oral chemotherapy was high using AMTRA with a median of 98.7% (95 confidence interval (CI) [93.5-100.0%]). Seventy-nine percent of patients stated that the availability of AMTRA self-reports was useful in communication with the care provider, while 75% felt more in control while managing their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The application of an interactive PRO-system in routine symptom management of cancer patients allowed standardized documentation of toxicities and recorded a high compliance with oral treatment. It allows for rapid interaction for toxicities and cancer-related symptoms experienced at home.
