Dissolution Profile Similarity Assessment-Best Practices, Decision Trees and Global Harmonization.

During the write-up of the meeting summary reports from the 2019 dissolution similarity workshop held at the University of Maryland's Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI), several coauthors continued their discussions to develop a "best-practice" document defining the steps required to assess dissolution profiles in support of certain biowaivers and postapproval changes. In previous reports, current challenges related to dissolution profile studies were discussed such that the steps outlined in the two flow charts ("decision trees") presented here can be applied. These decision trees include both recommendations for the use of equivalence procedures between reference and test products as well as application of the dissolution safe space concept. Common approaches towards establishing dissolution safe spaces are described. This paper encourages the preparation of protocols clearly describing why and how testing is performed along with the expected pass/fail criteria prior to generating data on the materials to be evaluated. The target audience of this manuscript includes CMC regulatory scientists, laboratory analysts, as well as statisticians from industry and regulatory health agencies involved in the assessment of product quality via in vitro dissolution testing. Building upon previous publications, this manuscript provides a solution to the current ambiguity related to dissolution profile comparison. The principles outlined in this and previous manuscripts provide a basis for global regulatory alignment in the application of dissolution profile assessment to support manufacturing changes and biowaiver requests.

DISSOLUTION PROFILE SIMILARITY ANALYSES-STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES, METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS.

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance with the emphasis given to the similarity factor f2 with little discussion of alternative methods. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive toward global harmonization, a workshop entitled "In Vitro Dissolution Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, When" was held on May 21-22, 2019 at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This manuscript provides in-depth discussion of the mathematical principles of the model-independent statistical methods for dissolution profile similarity analyses presented in the workshop. Deeper understanding of the testing objective and statistical properties of the available statistical methods is essential to identify methods which are appropriate for application in practice. A decision tree is provided to aid in the selection of an appropriate statistical method based on the underlying characteristics of the drug product. Finally, the design of dissolution profile studies is addressed regarding analytical and statistical recommendations to sufficiently power the study. This includes a detailed discussion on evaluation of dissolution profile data for which several batches per reference and/or test product are available.

Science and Risked-Based Stability Testing Strategies-a Test Case on the Global Implementation and Regulatory Reception.

The global regulatory implementation and acceptance of a science and risk-based stability (SRB) strategies for a stable drug product is reviewed. This stability strategy may also be referred to as "lean stability" since it includes a stability protocol reduction in the number of tests and time points than might normally be applied. A product line extension (new solid dosage form) for a well-understood product was used as a test case for this stability strategy. The drug product line extension was filed globally with a proposed reduction to analytical stability tests and frequency. This stability protocol is aligned with the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q1A (R2) stability guidelines (ICH: Guideline Q1A(R2), 2003), the World Health Organization (WHO) (WHO INT. [Online], 2020), and most country regulatory guidelines. Although this strategy was not accepted universally, the strategy enabled opportunities to engage in productive dialogs with regulatory authorities in several countries on how the case leveraged product understanding and development knowledge to develop a fit for purpose stability protocol. A persistent and consistent effort from industry to move toward product-specific protocols based on product knowledge and stability risk assessments should lead to further acceptance of science and risk-based stability strategies in all regions.

In Vitro Dissolution Profiles Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, When-Workshop Summary Report.

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product performance decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance. However, the requirements (e.g., which time points, number of time points, %CV) to apply the widely known similarity factor f2 and other alternative statistical approaches diverge noticeably across regulatory agencies. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive towards global harmonization, a workshop entitled "in vitro dissolution similarity assessment in support of drug product quality: what, how, when" was held May 21-22, 2019, at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This article summarizes key points from the podium presentations and breakout (BO) sessions focusing on (1) contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of several statistical methods; (2) the importance of experimental design for successful similarity evaluation; (3) the value of similarity evaluation in light of clinically relevant specifications; and (4) the need for creating a robust and scientifically appropriate path (e.g., non-prescriptive decision tree) for dissolution profile similarity assessment as a stepping stone for global harmonization.

Analysis of the Regulatory Divergence of Comparative Dissolution Requirements for Post-Approval Manufacturing Changes of Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms.

This manuscript discusses global regulatory divergence of dissolution requirements for modified release solid oral dosage forms and the obstacles that must be addressed to be compliant with evolving guidance and legislation. The proliferation of local guidance documents, changing regulatory expectations, and increased legal enforcement has resulted in mismatched country-specific dissolution testing requirements and similarity criteria, and heightens industry's challenges with registration of modified release solid oral dosage forms. The lack of global harmonization and the complexity added by minor regional adaptations contributes to inefficiencies and hinders industry's goal of developing and delivering medicines. Awareness of country-specific similarity requirements and alignment between industry leaders and regulators is needed to facilitate global harmonization which will enable delivering new and improved medicines. The purpose of this manuscript is to compare and contrast in vitro conditions stated in local regulatory guidelines, raise awareness of the need to work toward harmonization of global requirements, and propose an initial study design toward that aspiration.

Dissolution Similarity Requirements: How Similar or Dissimilar Are the Global Regulatory Expectations?

The objective of this article is to compare and contrast the international expectations associated with the model-independent similarity factor approach to comparing dissolution profiles. This comparison highlights globally divergent regulatory requirements to meet local dissolution similarity requirements. In effect, experiments customized to meet the current international regulatory expectations for dissolution and drug release unnecessarily increase manufacturing costs, hinder science and risk-based approaches, increase collective regulatory burden, reduce continuous improvement and innovation, and potentially delay patient access to urgently needed medication. Comparative assessment of regulatory differences in applying dissolution to demonstrate product similarity is crucial to reduce non-scientifically justified experiments and foster collaborative harmonization among global regulatory health authorities and the pharmaceutical industry.