ABSTRACT
El trauma se considera un problema de salud pública, siendo el trauma vascular un desafío para el cirujano de emergencia por su complejidad y morbimortalidad. Objetivo: Describir la experiencia en el manejo del trauma vascular periférico en el Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular del Hospital Dr. Miguel Pérez Carreño período enero 2.018 enero 2.021. Métodos: Se realizó estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, constituido por 410 pacientes, registrándose datos demográficos, mecanismo de lesión, tipos de lesión vascular, signos blandos y duros vasculares, grados de shock hipovolémico, vaso lesionado, procedimiento realizado, complicaciones y mortalidad. Se incluyeron 410 pacientes. La edad promedio fue 25,6 ± 18 años (14-72), sexo masculino en 89%. El mecanismo de lesión predominante fue el penetrante (92%), herida de arma de fuego (68%) y el trauma cerrado (7%). El diagnóstico fue clínico en 90% de los casos, el resto de la muestra fueron pacientes con lesiones crónicas como las fistulas AV y pseudoaneurismas. Las lesiones más frecuentes fueron en las extremidades inferiores (81%), extremidades superiores (17%) y cuello (2%). El tipo de lesión más común fue la transección arterial (49%) y lesión parcial (20%). Se presentó shock hipovolémico en 60% de los casos. La femoral superficial fue la más lesionada (70%) seguida de la poplítea (20%), la lesión asociada fue la fractura de huesos largos en un 30%. Se realizó interposición venosa autóloga en 89% de los casos. La infección de sitio operatorio registrada fue de 15% y la mortalidad de 0.4%. Conclusiones: El diagnóstico oportuno y manejo adecuado del trauma vascular demostró baja tasa de morbimortalidad y resultados favorables, incluso realizando reparación primaria, sin diferencia por grado de shock ni uso de shunt(AU)
Trauma is considered a public health problem, with vascular trauma being a challenge for the emergency surgeon due to its complexity, morbidity and mortality. Objetive: To describe the experience in the management of peripheral vascular trauma in the cardiovascular surgery department at Dr. Miguel Perez Carreño Hospital period January 2.018 - January 2.021. Methods: A retrospective, transversal and descriptive study was conducted, consisting of 410 patients, registering demographic data, injury mechanism, types of vascular injury, soft and hard vascular signs, degrees of hypovolemic shock, injured vessel, procedure performed, complications, and mortality. Results: 410 patients were included. The average age was 25.6 ± 18 years (14-72), 365 male (89%). The predominant injury mechanism was penetrating (92 %), gunshot wound (68%), and blunt trauma (7%). diagnosis by clinical in (90%), the rest of the sample was reserved for patients with chronic lesions such as AV fistulas and pseudoaneurysms. The most frequent lesions were in the lower extremities (81 %), upper extremities (17 %), and neck (2 %). The most common type of lesions were arterial transection (49%) and partial lesion (20%). Hypovolemic shock was present in (60%) of the cases. The superficial femoral artery was the most injured (70%) followed by the popliteal artery (20%), the associated injured was long bone fracture (30%). autologous venous interposition was performed in (89%) of cases. Registered surgical site infection was (15%) and mortality of 2 patients (0.4%). Conclusions: The timely diagnosis and proper management of vascular trauma showed a low rate of morbidity and mortality and favorable results, even carrying out primary repair, without difference by degree of shock or use of shunts(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Surgery Department, Hospital , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Indicators of Morbidity and Mortality , Femoral Artery/injuries , Shock , Wounds and Injuries , EmergenciesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Missed, delayed or incorrect diagnoses are considered to be diagnostic errors. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology of a study to analyse cognitive aspects of the process by which primary care (PC) physicians diagnose dyspnoea. It examines the possible links between the use of heuristics, suboptimal cognitive acts and diagnostic errors, using Reason's taxonomy of human error (slips, lapses, mistakes and violations). The influence of situational factors (professional experience, perceived overwork and fatigue) is also analysed. METHODS: Cohort study of new episodes of dyspnoea in patients receiving care from family physicians and residents at PC centres in Granada (Spain). With an initial expected diagnostic error rate of 20%, and a sampling error of 3%, 384 episodes of dyspnoea are calculated to be required. In addition to filling out the electronic medical record of the patients attended, each physician fills out 2 specially designed questionnaires about the diagnostic process performed in each case of dyspnoea. The first questionnaire includes questions on the physician's initial diagnostic impression, the 3 most likely diagnoses (in order of likelihood), and the diagnosis reached after the initial medical history and physical examination. It also includes items on the physicians' perceived overwork and fatigue during patient care. The second questionnaire records the confirmed diagnosis once it is reached. The complete diagnostic process is peer-reviewed to identify and classify the diagnostic errors. The possible use of heuristics of representativeness, availability, and anchoring and adjustment in each diagnostic process is also analysed. Each audit is reviewed with the physician responsible for the diagnostic process. Finally, logistic regression models are used to determine if there are differences in the diagnostic error variables based on the heuristics identified. DISCUSSION: This work sets out a new approach to studying the diagnostic decision-making process in PC, taking advantage of new technologies which allow immediate recording of the decision-making process.
