ABSTRACT
As the world sought the 'Holy Grail' of scarless surgery, minimizing access seemed to be the natural path to follow, and minilaparoscopy (MINI) was considered to be a natural advancement of standard laparoscopy. It aims at minimizing surgical trauma by further reducing the diameter of standard instruments, without compromising range of motion, triangulation or safety. Several different terms have been coined to address this sophisticated reduced-port technique, which is characterized by the use of instruments 3 mm or less in diameter: acuscopic surgery, minilaparoscopy, needlescopic surgery and microlaparoscopy. The early adoption of MINI was mostly inhibited by the limitations of first-generation instruments, especially with respect to functionality, cost and durability. Furthermore, mini cholecystectomy demanded the use of mini optics, which suffered from poor imaging quality and a short lifetime of the scopes. Newer-generation mini instruments have mitigated these issues through the use of improved effector tips, better insulation, strength and durability, and superior optics. During the early MINI years, surgeons clipped most structures, but sturdy mini clip appliers were either unavailable or did not hold the requisite-size clips. Clipping with MINI required the use of a standard clip applier and the scope had to be changed several times during a procedure, making MINI not only more complicated but also boring and time-consuming. The development and popularization of the clipless technique allowed the surgeon to get free from the expensive and cumbersome minilaparoscopic clip appliers, and replace clips with knots. The marked improvements in instrumentation and the development of the clipless technique have occurred simultaneously with the development of NOTES, LESS and Robotic surgery, which may have contributed to a greater push towards MINI. MINI has been proven to offer more than just better cosmesis. Other advantages include better visualization of the surgical field and, with the development of precisely engineered low-friction trocars, which enhance surgical precision during dynamic and delicate tasks (knotting and suturing small structures), less stress and higher efficiency, which makes the procedure easier to perform. Furthermore, transmission of electro cautery through mini instruments has led to less lateral spread of electric current and subsequent less tissue trauma. For more than 20 years, our team has successfully used minilaparoscopy. Even with the rising popularity of robotic surgery, which still uses 8 mm instruments, minilaparoscopy remains an attractive option that is far from becoming obsolete.
ABSTRACT
Laparoscopy using miniature (2-3.5 mm) instruments was introduced in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Though mini laparoscopy (Mini) created new opportunities for surgical diagnosis and therapy, the limitations of early instruments inhibited widespread adoption. This is no longer the case. Mini is enjoying a renaissance, due to several factors: the maturation of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), the failure of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) platforms to achieve early expectations, and the recent significant improvements in Mini instrument functionality and durability. As a result, Mini is being increasingly applied to pediatric and adult procedures across specialties. To assess the current status of Mini laparoscopy, the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (SLS) and the Florida Hospital Nicholson Center convened an international symposium in February 2015. This report shares highlights from that symposium, "Big Operations Using Mini Instruments."
