Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience.

PURPOSE: The advent of laparoscopic surgery has altered the manner by which surgical specialties address pathologies of the abdominal cavity. This advance in technology has also changed colorectal surgery. One of the more common procedures of colorectal surgery is segmental resection for polyps that are large, broad based, or inaccessible for colonoscopic removal. We present a technique combining colonoscopy and laparoscopy to remove troublesome polyps without the need for segmental resections. METHODS: From May 1990 to September 1999 laparoscopic-monitored colonic polypectomies were performed in 47 patients, with a total of 60 polyps being removed. After laparoscopic mobilization of the involved segment of the colon, the proximal bowel is cross-clamped and the colonoscope passed to the involved portion of the colon. The polyp is then presented to the colonoscopist by the laparoscopist facilitating removal. The serosal surface is monitored for any indications of transluminal injury, and the area is repaired if needed. All polyps undergo immediate frozen section analysis. If the pathologic evaluation indicates malignancy then a segmental resection may be performed, otherwise the patients are decompressed and fed within a short time before discharge. RESULTS: The polyps were located most commonly in the ascending colon (18 polyps), transverse colon (12 polyps), and cecum (12 polyps). The most common histopathologic diagnosis was tubulovillous adenoma in 28 polyps followed by villous adenoma in 11 polyps. In three cases histopathologic diagnosis revealed malignancy necessitating segmental resection (1 low anterior resection and 2 right hemicolectomies), which were performed laparoscopically. Patients received a liquid diet within 6 hours, were discharged in an average of 21 hours, and returned to full activity, usually within days. The only complication presented in this group of patients was an umbilical port seroma. Virtually all patients (97 percent) behaved as if only a colonoscopy had been performed. Pain at the trocar sites was managed with acetaminophen 600 mg by mouth as needed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-monitored colonoscopic polypectomy allows patients to undergo removal of colonic polyps without a segmental resection. This less invasive procedure yields recovery times similar to that of colonoscopy alone, and the potential complications of a segmental resection are avoided. All polyps are examined by frozen section, and if a malignancy is encountered, a laparoscopic resection can be performed.

Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of colorectal cancer is controversial. This study was undertaken to determine the oncological adequacy, in terms of margins of resection, lymph node harvest, and anastomotic and locoregional recurrence of laparoscopic colectomy in patients with stage III (node-positive) colorectal cancer. METHODS: The results of laparoscopic colectomy in 50 consecutive patients with stage III colorectal cancer operated on at a single hospital between 1991 and 1998 were analyzed with respect to postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival by the Kaplan-Meier method. Methodical patient follow-up was the mainstay of the study. RESULTS: There were 31 men (52%) and 19 women (38%) with a mean age of 67.7 years (range, 40-88). Low anterior resection was performed in 17 cases, abdominal perineal resection in five cases sigmoid colectomy in 10 cases, left hemicolectomy in six cases, right hemicolectomy in seven cases, transverse colectomy in one case, and subtotal colectomy in four cases. Conversion was necessary in three cases (6%). Major complications included one leak, one pelvic abscess, one perineal wound infection, and three anastomotic strictures early in the experience, with none in the past 4 years. One early death occurred due to massive stroke. Median length of stay was 6 days (range, 3-37). Forty-six patients were staged as CII and four as CI colon cancer. The average number of positive nodes was 5.1 (range, 3-58). The margins of resection were adequate in all patients. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 75 months (average, 29.3; median, 24). Overall cancer-related mortality was 34% (17 patients); three patients died of unrelated causes with no detectable cancer. All who died of cancer had distant disease; three of them also had pelvic recurrence. Mean time of death was 21.7 months. There were no anastomotic recurrences or trocar site implants. Overall 3- and 5-year survival was 54.5% and 38.5%, respectively; cancer-adjusted survival was 60.8% and 49.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, laparoscopic colectomy in patients with stage III colorectal cancer is oncologically adequate. It results in a long-term outcome comparable to that of traditional open surgery and is associated with low perioperative mortality and morbidity (lower wound infection rate, lower wound recurrences at trocar sites) and a shortened length of stay.