ABSTRACT
IntroductionCOVID -19 pandemic has threatened the optimal achievement on type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) target in primary health care (PHC), due to our priority in COVID-19 management, limited access of patients to PHC and their lifestyle changes as the impact of social restrictions. Therefore, the empowerment of capability of patients on diabetes self-care is required through optimal education and support. The use of telehealth in T2DM management has benefits on improving outcomes of patients. We aim to assess the role of telehealth diabetes self-management education (DSME) versus hybrid (telehealth and face-to-face method) diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) to improve T2DM outcomes in PHC during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods and analysisThis study is an open label randomized-controlled trial that will be conducted in 10 PHCs in Jakarta, Indonesia, involving patients with T2DM. Subjects are classified into 2 groups: DSME group and DSMES group. Intervention will be given every 2 weeks. DSME group will receive 1 educational video every 2 weeks discussing topics about diabetes self-management, while DSMES group will receive 1 educational video and undergo 1 coaching session every 2 weeks. All interventions will be conducted by trained health workers of PHC, who are physicians, nurses, and nutritionists. Our primary outcome is the change of HbA1C level and our secondary outcomes are the changes of nutritional intake, physical activity, quality of life, anthropometric parameter, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, inflammatory markers, and progression of diabetes complications at 3 and 6 months after intervention compare to the baseline. Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee University of Indonesia. Subjects agree to participate will be given written informed consent prior to data collection. Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Trial Registrationhttp://www.clinicalstrials.gov with identifier number NCT05090488. SummaryO_ST_ABSStrengths and limitations of the studyC_ST_ABSO_LIThis study evaluates the role of hybrid DSMES, which is useful in areas with limited access or on lockdowns. C_LIO_LIThis study will evaluates the implementation of hybrid DSMES, its benefits, difficulties, and obstacles. C_LIO_LIWe uses validated questionnaire instruments and routinely collected clinical data. C_LIO_LIBecause all of our interventions will be conducted by PHCs health workers, our results depend on the ability and adherence of PHCs health workers. C_LI
ABSTRACT
AimsTo investigate the prognostic value of admission blood glucose (BG) in predicting COVID-19 outcomes, including poor composite outcomes (mortality/severity), mortality, and severity. Materials and methodsEligible studies evaluating the prognostic value of fasting BG (FBG) and random BG (RBG) levels in predicting COVID-19 outcomes were included and assessed for risk of bias with the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Random-effects high-vs-low meta-analysis followed by dose-response analysis using generalized least squares model in a two-stage random-effects meta-analysis were conducted. Potential non-linear association was explored using restricted cubic splines and pooled using restricted maximum likelihood model in a multivariate meta-analysis. ResultsThe search yielded 35 studies involving a total of 14,502 patients. We discovered independent association between admission FBG and poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated non-linear relationship between admission FBG and severity (Pnon-linearity<0.001), where each 1 mmol/L increase augmented the risk of COVID-19 severity by 33% (risk ratio 1.33 [95% CI: 1.26-1.40]). Albeit exhibiting similar trends, study scarcity limited the strength of evidence on the independent prognostic value of admission RBG. GRADE assessment yielded high-quality evidence for the association between admission FBG and COVID-19 severity, and moderate-quality evidence for its association with mortality and poor outcomes, while the other assessments yielded very low-to-low quality. ConclusionHigh level of FBG at admission was independently associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Further researches to confirm the observed prognostic value of admission RBG and to ascertain the estimated dose-response risk between admission FBG and on COVID-19 severity are required.
