La hormona antimülleriana como marcador de función ovárica / Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian function

Por décadas, el significado clínico de la hormona antimülleriana (HAM) ha estado limitado a su papel crítico en el desarrollo sexual fetal. Sin embargo, en los últimos 20 años esta ha surgido también como marcador de función ovárica. La HAM tiene funciones específicas como regulador del crecimiento folicular, desempeñando su papel como señal de retroalimentación negativa. Jugaría un papel importante tanto en la regulación del número de folículos en crecimiento (inhibiendo el reclutamiento), como en su selección para ser ovulados (inhibiendo a FSH). La HAM es sintetizada como una pre-prohormona. En el citoplasma cada monómero es clivado generando un fragmento N-terminal: 110 KDa (región pro) y otro C-terminal: 25 KDa (región madura o nativa), unidos en forma no covalente por 2 puentes disulfuro. El dominio C-terminal es el bioactivo, uniéndose al receptor, pero necesita del fragmento N-terminal para desencadenar respuesta biológica. En circulación podemos encontrar una mezcla de la forma pro-HAM y del complejo C-terminal/N-terminal, que serían medidos por los ensayos disponibles. Distintos autores han demostrado que la HAM es un marcador precoz de la disminución y agotamiento de la reserva ovárica. Muestra una estrecha correlación con la reserva folicular y la capacidad reproductiva, más que la FSH y el estradiol. La revisión realizada no deja lugar a dudas sobre la utilidad de la HAM en la etapa fértil. Ha mostrado ser una excelente herramienta para caracterizar pobres respondedoras en los procedimientos de fertilización asistida, alertar precozmente en mujeres jóvenes sobre reserva ovárica baja, en relación con su edad cronológica y expresar un número de folículos en crecimiento elevado, como en síndrome de ovario poliquístico, para evitar una hiperestimulación ovárica. El creciente número de pacientes que decidieron retrasar su maternidad y su papel en la fisiología ovárica han posibilitado que la HAM integre hoy la evaluación de mujeres con alteraciones de la fertilidad.

For many years, the clinical significance of the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was limited to its critical role in foetal sexual development. However, in the last 20 years it has also emerged as a marker of ovarian function. AMH has specific functions as a regulator of follicular growth, playing its role as negative feedback signal. It may also play an important role in the regulation of the number of growing follicles (inhibiting the recruitment) as well as in their selection to be ovulated (inhibiting FSH). AMH is synthesised as a pre-pro-hormone. In the cytoplasm each monomer is cleaved, generating one N-terminal fragment: 110 KDa (pro region) and another C-terminal fragment: 25 KDa, non-covalently bound by two disulphide bridges. The C-terminal domain is bioactive, binding to the receptor, but requires the N-terminal fragment to trigger a biological response. A mixture of pro-AMH complex and C-terminal/N-terminal complex can be found in the bloodstream, which can be measured by the assays available. Several authors have shown that AMH is an early marker of the decrease and depletion of ovarian reserve. It shows a close correlation with follicular reserve and reproductive capacity more than FSH and oestradiol. This review leaves no doubt about the usefulness of AMH in the fertile phase. It has proven to be an excellent tool in characterising poor responders in assisted reproduction procedures, as an early alert in young women of a low ovarian reserve in relation to their chronological age, as well as in expressing a number of follicles in high growth, as in polycystic ovary syndrome, to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation. The growing number of patients who have decided to delay motherhood and the role of AMH in ovarian physiology has led it to an integral part of the assessment of women with impaired fertility.

Residual urinary output in high body mass index individuals on chronic hemodialysis: A disregarded life vest?

AIM: To assess residual diuresis and diverse variables according to body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Cross-sectional study (n = 57), with 3 groups. Group A: BMI < 25, n = 22; Group B: BMI 25-30, n = 15; Group C: BMI > 30, n = 20. Diuresis, hematocrit, albumin, C-reactive protein, Malnutrition inflammatory score, Pro-BNP, Troponin T, leptin and insulin levels are expressed as median and ranges (r). RESULTS: Albumin (g/dL): GA vs GC, 3.70 (r2.20-4.90) vs 3.85 (r3.40-4.90), P = 0.02. Diuresis (mL/d): GA 690 (r0-1780); GB 660 (r60-1800); GC 840 (r40-2840). Diuresis GA vs GC, P = 0.01. Leptin (ng/mL): GA vs GC, 3.81 (r0.78-69.60) vs GC, 32.80 (r0.78-124.50), P < 0.001. Insulin (µU/mL): GA vs GB, 7 (r2-44) vs 11.50 (r4-38), P = 0.02; GA vs GC, 7 (r2-44) vs 19.5 (r5-155), P = 0.0001. Troponin T and Pro-BNP levels were not different. Significant correlations: GC, Insulin-UF: ρ = 0.53; P = 0.03; TroponinT-diuresis: ρ = -0.48, P < 0.05; Pro-BNP-diuresis: ρ = -0.39, P < 0.01; Troponin T-ProBNP: ρ = 0.77, P < 0.0001; albumin-Troponin T: ρ = -0.66, P < 0.0001; albumin-ProBNP: ρ = -0.44, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: High BMI associated positively with higher diuresis and albuminemia, and negatively with TropT and Pro-BNP. High BMI-associated better survival may be explained by better urinary output, lowering cardiovascular stress.

Proteinuria, (99m) Tc-DTPA Scintigraphy, Creatinine-, Cystatin- and Combined-Based Equations in the Assessment of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Background. Precise estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the identification of markers of progression are important. We compared creatinine, cystatin, and combined CKD-EPI equations with (99m)Tc-DTPA scintigraphy to measure GFR and proteinuria as markers of progression. Methods. Cross-sectional, observational study including 300 subjects. CKD was classified by (99m)Tc-DTPA scintigraphy. Determinations. Creatinine, 24-hour creatinine clearance, cystatin, Hoek formula, and creatinine, cystatin, and combined CKD-EPI equations. Results. In the global assessment, creatinine CKD-EPI and combined CKD-EPI equations yielded the highest correlations with (99m)Tc-DTPA: ρ = 0.839, P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.831, P < 0.0001. Intergroup analysis versus (99m)Tc-DTPA: control G, creatinine clearance ρ = 0.414, P = 0.013; G3, combined CKD-EPI ρ = 0.5317, P < 0.0001; G4, Hoek ρ = 0.618, P < 0.0001, combined CKD-EPI ρ = 0.4638, P < 0.0001; and G5, creatinine clearance ρ = 0.5414, P < 0.0001, combined CKD-EPI ρ = 0.5288, P < 0.0001. In the global assessment, proteinuria displayed the highest significant correlations with cystatin ( ρ = 0.5433, P < 0.0001) and cystatin-based equations (Hoek: ρ = -0.5309, P < 0.0001). When GFR < 60 mL/min: in stage 3, proteinuria-cystatin ( ρ = 0.4341, P < 0.0001); proteinuria-Hoek ( ρ = -0.4105, P < 0.0001); in stage 4, proteinuria-cystatin ( ρ = 0.4877, P < 0.0001); proteinuria-Hoek ( ρ = -0.4877, P = 0.0026). Conclusions. At every stage of GFR < 60 mL/min, cystatin-based equations displayed better correlations with (99m)Tc-DTPA. Proteinuria and cystatin-based equations showed strong associations and high degrees of correlation.

Comparación ensayos de parathormona de segunda y tercera generación y su utilidad en hemodializados crónicos / Comparison of third and second generation parathyroid hormone assays and their use in chronic hemodialysis patiens

Introducción: El objetivo del trabajo es comparar ensayos de PTH de 2da y 3ra generación en pacientes con función renal normal y en hemodializados crónicos y sus implicancias en el tratamiento de esta última población. Métodos: Se estudiaron 60 pacientes hemodializados crónicos y 40 con función renal normal a quienes se les midió PTH por ambos ensayos. Resultados: En la población con función renal normal la mediana de PTH fue de 51.8 y de 45.6 pg/ml con el ensayo de 2da y 3ra generación respectivamente. En hemodializados crónicos la mediana de PTH fue de 193.9 y de 137.1 pg/ml con los ensayos de 2da y 3ra generación respectivamente. La diferencia entre los ensayos fue de 11.3% y 29.3% en la población con función renal y hemodializados respectivamente. El ensayo de 3ra generación produjo un corrimiento en la cantidad de pacientes que caen en los distintos rangos de PTH según las guías KDIGO, para un valor menor de 2 veces el límite superior de referencia: cambia de 20 a 25 pacientes, entre 2 y 9 veces: cambia de 31 a 32 pacientes y mayor de 9 veces: cambia de 9 a 3 pacientes. Conclusiones: Al aumentar la concentración de PTH aumentan las diferencias entre ambos ensayos, por lo que no se pueden utilizar indistintamente en una población de hemodializados crónicos.Con los ensayos de 3ra generación 11 pacientes (18.3%) modificaron su clasificación de acuerdo a las guías KDIGO lo que implicaría un cambio en el tratamiento.

Introduction: This work's objective is to compare third and second generation assays in patients with normal kidney function and in chronic hemodialysis patients, and the implications on the latter. Methods: 60 chronic hemodialysis patients and 40 patients with normal kidney function were studied and their PTH levels were measured for both assays. Results: In patients population with normal kidney function the average on PTH was 51.8 and 45.6 pg/ml with second and third generation assays respectively. In chronic hemodialysis patients the average PTH was 193.9 and 137.1 pg/ml with second and third generation assays respectively. The difference between assays was 11.3% and 29.3% in patients with normal kidney function and in hemodialysis patients respectively. Third generation assay caused a variation in the amount of patients that fall over several PTH ranges according to KDIGO guidelines, for a lesser value of 2 times the reference upper limit: it changes from 20 to 25 patients, between 2 and 9 times: it changes from 31 to 32 patients, and more than 9 times: it changes from 9 to 3 patients. Conclusions: When PTH concentration increases the difference between both assays also increases, for this reason we cannot use them indiscriminately in a chronic hemodialysis patient population. With third generation assays 11 patients (18.3%) changed their classification according to KDIGO guidelines, which will result in a change of treatment.

Pro-calcitonin and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis.

UNLABELLED: Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a marker of infection, a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed PCT levels in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, assessed its correlation with inflammatory and nutritional markers and propose a PCT reference value for non-infected HD patients. In an observational cross-sectional study, 48 chronic HD patients and 36 controls were analyzed. VARIABLES: age, gender, time on HD; diabetes; vascular access, PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, malnutrition inflammatory score (MIS), hematocrit, leukocyte count, and body mass index (BMI). Subsequently, control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. non-infected patients (G2, n = 48, 57%) groups were compared. In control subjects (G1), age: 54.3 ± 13.7 years, range (r): 30-81; males: 19 (53%); median PCT 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.02-0.08); median CRP 0.80 mg/ dl (r: 0.36-3.9); p95 PCT level: 0.063 ng/ml. In G2, age: 60.2 ± 15.2 years; males 32 (67%), time on HD: 27.0 ± 24.4; diabetics: 19 (32%); median PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); CRP: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT level: 0.8 ng/ml. In control subjects, PCT and CRP were significantly lower than in G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; CRP: 0.8 vs. 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. PCT-CRP correlation in G2: p = 0.287, p = 0.048. PCT and CRP concentrations are elevated in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, independently of infection, diabetes and vascular access. A p95 PCT level of 0.8 ng/ml may be considered as the upper normal reference value in non-acutely infected HD subjects. The PCT cut-off level in HD is yet to be determined in HD.

Pro-calcitonin and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis / Pro-calcitonina e inflamación en hemodiálisis crónica

Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a marker of infection, a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed PCT levels in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, assessed its correlation with inflammatory and nutritional markers and propose a PCT reference value for non-infected HD patients.In an observational cross-sectional study, 48 chronic HD patients and 36 controls were analyzed. Variables: age, gender, time on HD; diabetes; vascular access, PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, malnutrition inflammatory score (MIS), hematocrit, leukocyte count, and body mass index (BMI). Subsequently, control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. non-infected patients (G2, n = 48, 57%) groups were compared. In control subjects (G1), age: 54.3 ± 13.7 years, range (r): 30-81; males: 19 (53%); median PCT 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.02-0.08); median CRP 0.80 mg/dl (r: 0.36-3.9); p95 PCT level: 0.063 ng/ml. In G2, age: 60.2 ± 15.2 years; males 32 (67%), time on HD: 27.0 ± 24.4; diabetics: 19 (32%); median PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); CRP: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT level: 0.8 ng/ml. In control subjects, PCT and CRP were significantly lower than in G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; CRP: 0.8 vs. 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. PCT-CRP correlation in G2: ρ = 0.287, p = 0.048. PCT and CRP concentrations are elevated in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, independently of infection, diabetes and vascular access. A p95 PCT level of 0.8 ng/ml may be considered as the upper normal reference value in non-acutely infected HD subjects. The PCT cut-off level in HD is yet to be determined in HD.

La procalcitonina (PCT) puede ser un marcador de infección en la hemodiálisis (HD). Analizamos los niveles de PCT en sujetos sin infección aguda en HD crónica, su correlación con marcadores inflamatorios y nutricionales y, de acuerdo a ello, proponemos niveles de referencia de PCT. En un estudio observacional transversal se estudiaron 48 pacientes en HD y 36 controles. Variables: edad; sexo, tiempo en HD; diabetes; acceso vascular, PCT, proteína C-reactiva (PCR), albúmina, score de malnutrición-inflamación, hematocrito, recuento leucocitario, e índice de masa muscular (IMC). En los controles se determinaron PCT y PCR. Se comparó grupo control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. pacientes (G2, n = 48, 57%). G1: edad, 54.3 ± 13.7, rango (r): 30-81 años; hombres: 19 (53%); PCT mediana: 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.020-0.080); PCR mediana: 0.8 mg/dl (r: 0.36-3.9); el nivel p95 de PCT: 0.063 ng/ml. En el G2, edad media 60.2 ± 15.2 años, hombres: 32 (66%), tiempo en HD: 27.0 2 4.4; diabéticos: 19 (32%); PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); PCR: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT: 0.8 ng/ml. En G1 los niveles de PCT y PCR fueron significativamente más bajos que en G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; PCR: 0.8 vs 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. Correlación PCT- PCR en G2: ρ = 0.287, p = 0.048. La PCT y la PCR están elevadas en HD crónica independientemente de infección, diabetes y acceso vascular. Se propone p95 de PCT de 0.8 ng/ml como límite superior del intervalo de referencia en sujetos sin infección aguda en HD. El valor de PCT en HD está por determinarse.

Pro-calcitonin and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis / Pro-calcitonina e inflamación en hemodiálisis crónica

Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a marker of infection, a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed PCT levels in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, assessed its correlation with inflammatory and nutritional markers and propose a PCT reference value for non-infected HD patients.In an observational cross-sectional study, 48 chronic HD patients and 36 controls were analyzed. Variables: age, gender, time on HD; diabetes; vascular access, PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, malnutrition inflammatory score (MIS), hematocrit, leukocyte count, and body mass index (BMI). Subsequently, control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. non-infected patients (G2, n = 48, 57%) groups were compared. In control subjects (G1), age: 54.3 ± 13.7 years, range (r): 30-81; males: 19 (53%); median PCT 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.02-0.08); median CRP 0.80 mg/dl (r: 0.36-3.9); p95 PCT level: 0.063 ng/ml. In G2, age: 60.2 ± 15.2 years; males 32 (67%), time on HD: 27.0 ± 24.4; diabetics: 19 (32%); median PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); CRP: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT level: 0.8 ng/ml. In control subjects, PCT and CRP were significantly lower than in G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; CRP: 0.8 vs. 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. PCT-CRP correlation in G2: ρ = 0.287, p = 0.048. PCT and CRP concentrations are elevated in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, independently of infection, diabetes and vascular access. A p95 PCT level of 0.8 ng/ml may be considered as the upper normal reference value in non-acutely infected HD subjects. The PCT cut-off level in HD is yet to be determined in HD.(AU)

La procalcitonina (PCT) puede ser un marcador de infección en la hemodiálisis (HD). Analizamos los niveles de PCT en sujetos sin infección aguda en HD crónica, su correlación con marcadores inflamatorios y nutricionales y, de acuerdo a ello, proponemos niveles de referencia de PCT. En un estudio observacional transversal se estudiaron 48 pacientes en HD y 36 controles. Variables: edad; sexo, tiempo en HD; diabetes; acceso vascular, PCT, proteína C-reactiva (PCR), albúmina, score de malnutrición-inflamación, hematocrito, recuento leucocitario, e índice de masa muscular (IMC). En los controles se determinaron PCT y PCR. Se comparó grupo control (G1, n = 36, 43%) vs. pacientes (G2, n = 48, 57%). G1: edad, 54.3 ± 13.7, rango (r): 30-81 años; hombres: 19 (53%); PCT mediana: 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.020-0.080); PCR mediana: 0.8 mg/dl (r: 0.36-3.9); el nivel p95 de PCT: 0.063 ng/ml. En el G2, edad media 60.2 ± 15.2 años, hombres: 32 (66%), tiempo en HD: 27.0 2 4.4; diabéticos: 19 (32%); PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); PCR: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT: 0.8 ng/ml. En G1 los niveles de PCT y PCR fueron significativamente más bajos que en G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; PCR: 0.8 vs 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. Correlación PCT- PCR en G2: ρ = 0.287, p = 0.048. La PCT y la PCR están elevadas en HD crónica independientemente de infección, diabetes y acceso vascular. Se propone p95 de PCT de 0.8 ng/ml como límite superior del intervalo de referencia en sujetos sin infección aguda en HD. El valor de PCT en HD está por determinarse.(AU)

Proteinuria and its relation to diverse biomarkers and body mass index in chronic hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Certain adipokines exert direct effects on proteinuria, a cardiovascular risk factor ignored in hemodialysis. We measured different adipokines according to body mass index (BMI) in relation to proteinuria. METHODS: Patients numbered 57: group A (GA), BMI<25, n = 22; GB, BMI 25-30, n = 15; and GC, BMI > 30, n = 20. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, time on dialysis, cause of renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, C-reactive protein, or nutritional status. Measures were taken of 24-hour diuresis and proteinuria, ultrafltration, albumin, pro-brain natriuretic peptide (Pro-BNP), insulin, adiponectin, leptin, and ghrelin. RESULTS: Proteinuria was signifcantly higher in GC versus (vs) GA (1.5 g/day, range 0.30-14 vs 0.72 g/day, range 0.1-2.7; P < 0.01) and correlated signifcantly with leptin levels (ρ = 0.47, P < 0.05). In GA, elevated levels of Pro-BNP, adiponectin, and ghrelin were associated with lower degrees of proteinuria. Signifcant correlations were found between adiponectin and leptin (ρ = -0.54, P = 0.03), and adiponectin and Pro-BNP (ρ = 0.59, P = 0.02). Though not signifcant, there were more diabetics in GC (GA four, GB three, GC ten). As BMI increased in GB and GC, Pro-BNP, adiponectin, and ghrelin levels decreased signifcantly, while proteinuria, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance increased. Leptin levels were signifcantly elevated in GC vs GA and GB. In GC, ghrelin correlated signifcantly with Pro-BNP (ρ = 0.51, P = 0.03), while leptin correlation with Pro-BNP was inverse and signifcant in GA (ρ = -0.74, P < 0.001) and inverse and nonsignifcant in GB and GC. CONCLUSION: In patients with BMI < 25, higher adiponectin, ghrelin, and Pro-BNP levels were associated with lower proteinuria and leptinemia. In obesity, hyperleptinemia and hyperinsulinemia associated with higher proteinuria; whether decreased adiponectin-ghrelin-ProBNP and/or elevated leptin-insulin levels aggravate proteinuria remains to be determined.

Pro-calcitonin and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis. / Pro-calcitonin and inflammation in chronic hemodialysis.

UNLABELLED: Procalcitonin (PCT) has emerged as a marker of infection, a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed PCT levels in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, assessed its correlation with inflammatory and nutritional markers and propose a PCT reference value for non-infected HD patients. In an observational cross-sectional study, 48 chronic HD patients and 36 controls were analyzed. VARIABLES: age, gender, time on HD; diabetes; vascular access, PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, malnutrition inflammatory score (MIS), hematocrit, leukocyte count, and body mass index (BMI). Subsequently, control (G1, n = 36, 43

) vs. non-infected patients (G2, n = 48, 57

) groups were compared. In control subjects (G1), age: 54.3 ± 13.7 years, range (r): 30-81; males: 19 (53

); median PCT 0.034 ng/ml (r: 0.02-0.08); median CRP 0.80 mg/ dl (r: 0.36-3.9); p95 PCT level: 0.063 ng/ml. In G2, age: 60.2 ± 15.2 years; males 32 (67

), time on HD: 27.0 ± 24.4; diabetics: 19 (32

); median PCT: 0.26 ng/ml (r: 0.09-0.82); CRP: 1.1 mg/dl (r: 0.5-6.2); p95 PCT level: 0.8 ng/ml. In control subjects, PCT and CRP were significantly lower than in G2: PCT: 0.034 vs. 0.26 ng/ml, p = 0.0001; CRP: 0.8 vs. 1.1 mg/dl, p = 0.0004. PCT-CRP correlation in G2: p = 0.287, p = 0.048. PCT and CRP concentrations are elevated in chronic non-acutely infected HD subjects, independently of infection, diabetes and vascular access. A p95 PCT level of 0.8 ng/ml may be considered as the upper normal reference value in non-acutely infected HD subjects. The PCT cut-off level in HD is yet to be determined in HD.

Proteinuria: an ignored marker of inflammation and cardiovascular disease in chronic hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients, the main etiologies being diabetes and hypertension. Cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers are usually employed to assess risk or damage, or during follow-up. Proteinuria is considered a strong predictor of morbidity, a cause of inflammation, oxidative stress, hemodynamic alteration, and progression of chronic kidney disease. However, proteinuria is rarely considered in the clinical assessment of HD patients. METHODS: This was a concurrent, cohort-observational, cross-sectional study in which 52 chronic HD subjects were divided into three groups according to the degree of proteinuria: Group (G) A: <1 g/day, n = 25; GB: 1-3 g/day, n = 13; GC: >3 g/day, n = 14. Baseline hemoglobin, albuminemia, cholesterol, body mass index, Malnutrition-Inflammatory Score, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T, C-reactive protein (CRP), and ultrafiltration rates were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in terms of baseline age, gender, hypertension, cause of renal failure, hemoglobin, cholesterol, albumin, CRP levels, cardiac biomarkers, adiponectin, body mass index, or Malnutrition-Inflammatory Score. Time on HD: GA, 34.56 ± 23.3 (range [r]: 6-88); GB, 25.15 ± 19.40 (r: 6-58); GC, 18.21 ± 9.58 (r: 6-74) months; P = 0.048. Proteinuria: GA, 0.33 ± 0.30 (r: 0.0-0.88); GB, 1.66 ± 0.54 (r: 1.03-2.75); GC, 7.18 ± 2.80 (r: 3.04-21.5) g/day; P < 0.001. Mean ultrafiltration rates were significantly different: GA, 2.80 ± 0.73; GB: 1.85 ± 0.96 liters/session; P = 0.003. Fourteen diabetic patients were identified (27%): GA, 3 (12%); GB, 3 (23%); GC, 8 (57%); P = 0.009. A positive and significant correlation was observed between diabetes and proteinuria >3 g/day: rho 0.438, P = 0.027. Although troponin T, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, adiponectin, and CRP were not different among groups, the positive correlation between troponin T and CRP elevated significantly as proteinuria increased: GA, rho 377, P = 0.063; GB, rho 663, P = 0.013; GC, rho 687, P = 0.007. CONCLUSION: In chronic HD, nephrotic-range proteinuria was significantly higher in diabetic nephropathy patients versus other causes. This was associated with inflammation and cardiac stress and was independent of fluid removal. Proteinuria >3 g/day was associated with shorter time on HD. Whether severe proteinuria is associated with shorter survival in HD, independent of diabetes, is to be determined. Proteinuria should be considered in the assessment of cardiovascular and inflammatory states in HD patients.

In hemodialysis, adiponectin, and pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels may be subjected to variations in body mass index.

Adiponectin exerts cardiovascular protective actions, although some studies have shown the opposite. In hemodialysis, obese subjects display lower mortality rates despite hypoadiponectinemia, while higher adiponectin concentrations correlate with an elevated cardiovascular risk in nonobese subjects. The aim of the study is to suggest that adiponectin level variations are associated with differences in the body mass index (BMI). The interplay between adiponectin and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (Pro-BNP) levels may vary according to body fat mass. Fifty-two chronic hemodialysis patients were divided into three groups. Group A, BMI<25 (n=20); Group B, BMI 25 to 30 (n=21), and Group C, BMI>30 (n=11). Diabetics: Group A 10%; Group B 6 29%; Group C 55%, P=0.027. Determinations: Adiponectin, Pro-BNP, insulin, insulin resistance (HOMA), troponin T, nutritional status, ultrafiltration rates, C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular accesses, and echocardiography. Group A: adiponectinemia positively and significantly correlated with Pro-BNP, CRP, and troponin T. As BMI increased, adiponectin, Pro-BNP, and malnutrition significantly decreased, while insulin, HOMA, and ultrafiltration rates significantly increased. Cardiac restriction was significantly higher in obese patients. In all groups, Pro-BNP and troponin T displayed a strong positive correlation. In low-BMI subjects, high Pro-BNP and adiponectin, low myocardial restriction, and worse nutritional status were prevalent. In obesity, hypoadiponectinemia stimulates cardiac remodeling, cardiac hypertrophy, and decreased stretching, rendering Pro-BNP levels low despite high ultrafiltration rates. Thus, adiponectin correlates inversely with BMI, probably playing different cardiovascular roles as BMI changes.

Elevated pro-brain natriuretic peptide, troponin T and malnutrition inflammatory score in chronic hemodialysis patients with overt cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the relationship between pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), troponin T (TropT) and nutritional status. METHODS: A total of 48 chronic hemodialysis patients were grouped according to the presence [group A (GA); n = 24] or not [group B (GB)] of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Compared to GB subjects, GA subjects were older, had been on hemodialysis for a longer period and had higher prevalences of vascular grafts, hypertension and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) [GA vs. GB: 1.1 (range 0.1-32.9) vs. 0.4 (0-28.1) mg/dl; p = 0.028], malnutrition inflammatory score (MIS) (GA vs. GB: 7.50 vs. 4.00; p = 0.001), pro-BNP [GA vs. GB: 6,760 (601-103,200) vs. 686 (75-83,700) pg/ml; p < 0.001] and TropT [GA vs. GB: 0.3650 (0.011-0.199) vs. 0.010 (0.0-0.290) ng/ml; p = 0.002]. Pro-BNP correlated with TropT (rho 0.539; p < 0.001), MIS (rho 0.502; p < 0.0001), homocysteine (rho 0.321; p = 0.13) and CRP (rho 0.511; p < 0.0001). Pro-BNP levels were lower in GB patients as the body mass index increased; the opposite occurred in GA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cardiovascular disease had elevated pro-BNP and TropT levels. In patients without cardiovascular disease, malnutrition and inflammation were associated with vascular prostheses, while pro-BNP was lower in obese patients.