ABSTRACT
Men with testicular cancer (TC) risk impaired fertility. Fertility is a major concern for TC patients due to diagnosis in almost always reproductive ages and high overall survival. This study assessed counselling in regards to the risk of impaired fertility and sperm cryopreservation. A cross-sectional survey was performed on 566 TC patients diagnosed between 1995-2015. Of the 566 survivors, 201 questionnaires were completed (35.5%). Eighty-eight percent was informed about possible impaired fertility, 9.5% was not informed. The majority (47.3%) preferred the urologist to provide information. Collecting sperm was troublesome but successful for 25.6%, 4.8% did not succeed in collecting sperm. The reasons were high pressure due to disease, pain after surgery and uncomfortable setting. Due to impaired fertility, 19% of the respondents reported grief and 9.3% stated as being less satisfied in life. Sperm cryopreservation was performed by 41.3% (n = 83). One third (n = 63, 31.3%) had children after treatment, of which 11.1% made use of preserved sperm (n = 7). The results of this survey indicate the importance of timely discussion of fertility issues with TC patients. While being discussed with most men, dissatisfaction and grief may occur as a result of impaired fertility and a lack of counselling. Overall, 6.5% made use of cryopreserved sperm (n = 13). Men prefer their urologist providing counselling on fertility.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study evaluated current fertility care for CKD patients by assessing the perspectives of nephrologists and nurses in the dialysis department. METHODS: Two different surveys were distributed for this cross-sectional study among Dutch nephrologists (N = 312) and dialysis nurses (N = 1211). RESULTS: Response rates were 50.9% (nephrologists) and 45.4% (nurses). Guidelines on fertility care were present in the departments of 9.0% of the nephrologists and 15.6% of the nurses. 61.7% of the nephrologists and 23.6% of the nurses informed ≥50% of their patients on potential changes in fertility due to a decline in renal function. Fertility subjects discussed by nephrologists included "wish to have children" (91.2%), "risk of pregnancy for patients' health" (85.8%), and "inheritance of the disease" (81.4%). Barriers withholding nurses from discussing FD were based on "the age of the patient" (62.6%), "insufficient training" (55.2%), and "language and ethnicity" (51.6%). 29.2% of the nurses felt competent in discussing fertility, 8.3% had sufficient knowledge about fertility, and 75.7% needed to expand their knowledge. More knowledge and competence were associated with providing fertility health care (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In most nephrology departments, the guidelines to appoint which care provider should provide fertility care to CKD patients are absent. Fertility counseling is routinely provided by most nephrologists, nurses often skip this part of care mainly due to insufficiencies in self-imposed competence and knowledge and barriers based on cultural diversity. The outcomes identified a need for fertility guidelines in the nephrology department and training and education for nurses on providing fertility care.
Subject(s)
Fertility , Nephrology , Nurse's Role , Patient Education as Topic , Physician's Role , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Clinical Competence , Communication Barriers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cultural Competency , Education, Medical , Education, Nursing , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrology/education , Netherlands , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Self Efficacy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of saline contrast hysterosonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity in women complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies that compared saline contrast hysterosonography to a gold standard diagnosis based on either hysteroscopy with or without histological sampling or to hysterectomy. SETTING: University Hospital. SAMPLE: Twenty-four studies (including 2278 procedures). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies and references were cross checked. Validity was assessed and data were extracted independently by two authors. Heterogeneity was calculated, studies were plotted in an ROC area and data were pooled. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the validity area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The success rate of saline contrast hysterosonography. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio's and post-test probabilities of saline contrast hysterosonography on the prediction of uterine cavity abnormality. RESULTS: The largest population of homogeneous data were the studies with complete verification. In these studies, the pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity of saline contrast hysterosonography in uterine cavity evaluation were respectively 0.95 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92), the likelihood ratios were respectively 8.23 (95% CI 6.2 to 11) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.09) and the post-test probabilities were respectively 0.91 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) and 0.07 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.10). The overall success rate of saline contrast hysterosonography was 93% (95% CI 92% to 94%). The feasibility of saline contrast hysterosonography in postmenopausal women (success rate 86.5%, 95% CI 83.2 to 89.8) is significantly lower (P < 0.01) compared with premenopausal women (success rate 95%, 95% CI 94% to 96%). CONCLUSION: Saline contrast hysterosonography is accurate in the evaluation of the uterine cavity in pre- and postmenopausal women suffering from abnormal uterine bleeding. The feasibility of saline contrast hysterosonography is high, although significantly better in premenopausal women compared with postmenopausal women. We conclude that saline contrast hysterosonography, in combination with an endometrium aspiration if necessary, can become the standard diagnostic procedure in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Sodium Chloride , Uterine Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Postmenopause , Premenopause , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography , Uterine Hemorrhage/etiology , Uterine Neoplasms/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate to which extent saline contrast hysterosonography (SCHS) is able to replace diagnostic hysteroscopy in uterine cavity evaluation in women suspected of intrauterine abnormalities. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective observational study we performed SCHS instead of diagnostic hysteroscopy. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed in case of failed or inconclusive SCHS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess subgroups for their risk of failure and inconclusiveness. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen women were included consecutively. SCHS was conclusive in 180 cases (84.1%), failed in 12 (5.6%), and inconclusive in 22 (10.3%). Uterine size above 600 cm(3) was the best predictor of failure and/or inconclusiveness (positive predictive value 0.42). CONCLUSION: SCHS was able to replace 84% of the outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies in uterine cavity evaluation in women suspected of intrauterine abnormalities. Our study showed that diagnostic hysteroscopy can be restricted to inconclusive or failed SCHS.
