SGLT5 is the renal transporter for 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a major player in two rare forms of neutropenia.

Neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction in glycogen storage disease type 1b (GSD1b) and severe congenital neutropenia type 4 (SCN4), associated with deficiencies of the glucose-6-phosphate transporter (G6PT/SLC37A4) and the phosphatase G6PC3, respectively, are the result of the accumulation of 1,5-anhydroglucitol-6-phosphate in neutrophils. This is an inhibitor of hexokinase made from 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), an abundant polyol in blood. 1,5-AG is presumed to be reabsorbed in the kidney by a sodium-dependent-transporter of uncertain identity, possibly SGLT4/SLC5A9 or SGLT5/SLC5A10. Lowering blood 1,5-AG with an SGLT2-inhibitor greatly improved neutrophil counts and function in G6PC3-deficient and GSD1b patients. Yet, this effect is most likely mediated indirectly, through the inhibition of the renal 1,5-AG transporter by glucose, when its concentration rises in the renal tubule following inhibition of SGLT2. To identify the 1,5-AG transporter, both human and mouse SGLT4 and SGLT5 were expressed in HEK293T cells and transport measurements were performed with radiolabelled compounds. We found that SGLT5 is a better carrier for 1,5-AG than for mannose, while the opposite is true for human SGLT4. Heterozygous variants in SGLT5, associated with a low level of blood 1,5-AG in humans cause a 50-100% reduction in 1,5-AG transport activity tested in model cell lines, indicating that SGLT5 is the predominant kidney 1,5-AG transporter. These and other findings led to the conclusion that (1) SGLT5 is the main renal transporter of 1,5-AG; (2) frequent heterozygous mutations (allelic frequency > 1%) in SGLT5 lower blood 1,5-AG, favourably influencing neutropenia in G6PC3 or G6PT deficiency; (3) the effect of SGLT2-inhibitors on blood 1,5-AG level is largely indirect; (4) specific SGLT5-inhibitors would be more efficient to treat these neutropenias than SGLT2-inhibitors.

Successful use of empagliflozin to treat neutropenia in two G6PC3-deficient children: Impact of a mutation in SGLT5.

Neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction found in deficiencies in G6PC3 and in the glucose-6-phosphate transporter (G6PT/SLC37A4) are due to accumulation of 1,5-anhydroglucitol-6-phosphate (1,5-AG6P), an inhibitor of hexokinase made from 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), an abundant polyol present in blood. Lowering blood 1,5-AG with an SGLT2 inhibitor greatly improved neutrophil counts and function in G6PC3-deficient mice and in patients with G6PT-deficiency. We evaluate this treatment in two G6PC3-deficient children. While neutropenia was severe in one child (PT1), which was dependent on granulocyte cololony-stimulating factor (GCSF), it was significantly milder in the other one (PT2), which had low blood 1,5-AG levels and only required GCSF during severe infections. Treatment with the SGLT2-inhibitor empagliflozin decreased 1,5-AG in blood and 1,5-AG6P in neutrophils and improved (PT1) or normalized (PT2) neutrophil counts, allowing to stop GCSF. On empagliflozin, both children remained infection-free (>1 year - PT2; >2 years - PT1) and no side effects were reported. Remarkably, sequencing of SGLT5, the gene encoding the putative renal transporter for 1,5-AG, disclosed a rare heterozygous missense mutation in PT2, replacing the extremely conserved Arg401 by a histidine. The higher urinary clearance of 1,5-AG explains the more benign neutropenia and the outstanding response to empagliflozin treatment found in this child. Our data shows that SGLT2 inhibitors are an excellent alternative to treat the neutropenia present in G6PC3-deficiency.

Media framing of emergency departments: a call to action for nurses and other health care providers.

BACKGROUND: As part of a larger study focused on interventions to enhance the capacity of nurses and other health care workers to provide equity-oriented care in emergency departments (EDs), we conducted an analysis of news media related to three EDs. The purpose of the analysis was to examine how media writers frame issues pertaining to nursing, as well as the health and social inequities that drive emergency department contexts, while considering what implications these portrayals hold for nursing practice. METHODS: We conducted a search of media articles specific to three EDs in Canada, published between January 1, 2018 and May 1, 2019. Media items (N = 368) were coded by story and theme attributes. A thematic analysis was completed to understand how writers in public media present issues pertaining to nursing practice within the ED context. RESULTS: Two overarching themes were found. First, in ED-related media that portrays health care needs of people experiencing health and social inequities, messaging frequently perpetuates stigmatizing discourses. Second, media writers portray pressures experienced by nurses working in the ED in a way that evades structural determinants of quality of care. Underlying both themes is an absence of perspectives and authorship from practicing nurses themselves. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that frontline nurses be prioritized as experts in public media communications. Nurses must be supported to gain critical media skills to contribute to media, to destigmatize the health care needs of people experiencing inequity who attend their practice, and to shed light on the structural causes of pressures experienced by nurses working within emergency department settings.