Quality Indicators to Evaluate Essential Newborn Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to improve neonatal outcomes rely on accurate collection and analyses of quality indicators. Most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) fail to monitor facility-level indicators, partly because recommended and consistently defined indicators for essential newborn care (ENC) do not exist. This gap prompted our development of an annotated directory of quality indicators. METHODS: We used a mixed method study design. In phase 1, we selected potential indicators by reviewing existing literature. An overall rating was assigned based on subscores for scientific evidence, importance, and usability. We used a modified Delphi technique for consensus-based approval from American Academy of Pediatrics Helping Babies Survive Planning Group members (phase 2) and secondarily surveyed international partners with expertise in ENC, LMIC clinical environments, and indicator development (phase 3). We generated the final directory with guidelines for site-specific indicator selection (phase 4). RESULTS: We identified 51 indicators during phase 1. Following Delphi sessions and secondary review, we added 5 indicators and rejected 7. We categorized the 49 indicators meeting inclusion criteria into 3 domains: 17 outcome, 21 process, and 11 educational. Among those, we recommend 30 for use, meaning indicators should be selected preferentially when appropriate; we recommend 9 for selective use primarily because of data collection challenges and 10 for use with reservation because of scientific evidence or usability limitations. CONCLUSIONS: We developed this open-access indicator directory with input from ENC experts to enable appraisal of care provision, track progress toward improvement goals, and provide a standard for benchmarking care delivery among LMICs.

Implementation of a Standardized Premedication Bundle to Improve Procedure Success for Nonemergent Neonatal Intubations.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends premedication for all nonemergent neonatal intubations, yet there remains significant variation in this practice nationally. We aimed to standardize our unit's premedication practices for improved intubation success and reduced adverse events. Methods: The study workgroup developed educational material and protocol content. Process measures included premedication use, education, and audit form completion. Primary (success on first intubation attempt and adverse event rates) and secondary (trainee success) study outcomes are displayed using statistical process control charts and pre-post cohort comparisons. Results: Forty-seven percent (97/206) of nurses completed educational intervention before protocol release, with an additional 20% (42/206) following a staff reminder. Two hundred sixteen (216) patients were intubated per protocol with 81% (174/216) audit completion. Compared with baseline (n = 158), intubation attempts decreased from 2 (IQR, 1-2) to 1 (IQR, 1-2) (P = 0.03), and success on the first attempt increased from 40% (63/158) to 57% (124/216) (P < 0.01), with a notable improvement in trainee success from less than 1% (1/40) to 43% (31/72) (P < 0.01). The rate of severe and rare adverse events remained stable; however, there was a rise in nonsevere events from 30% (48/158) to 45% (98/216). The tachycardia rate increased with atropine use. There was no change in chest wall rigidity, number of infants unable to extubate following surfactant, or decompensation awaiting medications. Conclusions: Standardizing procedural care delivery reduced intubation attempts and increased the attempt success rate. However, this was accompanied by an increase in the rate of nonsevere adverse events.

Prematurity and Congenital Heart Disease: A Contemporary Review.

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most commonly reported birth defect in newborns. Neonates with CHD are more likely to be born prematurely, and a higher proportion of preterm neonates have CHD than their term counterparts. The implications of preterm birth on the cardiac and noncardiac organ systems are vast and require special management considerations. The feasibility of surgical interventions in preterm neonates is frequently limited by patient size and delicacy of immature cardiac tissues. Thus, special care must be taken when considering the appropriate timing and type of cardiac intervention. Despite improvements in neonatal cardiac surgical outcomes, preterm and early term gestational ages and low birthweight remain important risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Understanding the risks of early delivery of neonates with prenatally diagnosed CHD may help guide perioperative management in neonates who are born preterm. In this review, we will describe the risks and benefits of early delivery, postnatal cardiac and noncardiac evaluation and management, surgical considerations, overall outcomes, and future directions regarding optimization of perinatal evaluation and management of fetuses and preterm and early term neonates with CHD.

Global Health Education and Best Practices for Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Trainees.

Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) trainees are expressing an increased interest in global health. NPM fellowship programs are tasked with ensuring that interested fellows receive appropriate training and mentorship to participate in the global health arena. Global health engagement during fellowship varies based on a trainee's experience level, career goals, and academic interests. Some trainees may seek active learning opportunities through clinical rotations abroad whereas others may desire engagement through research or quality improvement partnerships. To accommodate these varying interests, NPM fellows and training programs may choose to explore institutional partnerships, opportunities through national organizations with global collaborators, or domestic opportunities with high-risk populations. During any global health project, the NPM trainee needs robust mentorship from professionals at both their home institution and their partner international site. Trainees intending to use their global health project to fulfill the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) scholarly activity requirement must also pay particular attention to selecting a project that is feasible during fellowship and also meets ABP criteria for board eligibility. Above all, NPM fellows and training programs should strive to ensure equitable, sustainable, and mutually beneficial collaborations.