ABSTRACT
The Southeastern Coastal Center for Agricultural Health and Safety (SCCAHS) is one of many newly-funded federal research centers, housing five multidisciplinary research projects and seven pilot projects, and serving a multi-state region. In the early stages of such a complex project, with multiple teams separated by geography and disciplines, the evaluation program has been integral in connecting internal and external stakeholders at the center and project levels. We used a developmental evaluation (DE) framework to respond to the complex political environment surrounding agricultural health and safety in the southeast; to engage external stakeholders in guiding the center's research and outreach trajectories; to support center research teams in a co-creation process to develop logic models and tailored indicators; and to provide timely and feedback within the center to address communications gaps identified by the evaluation program. By using DE principles to shape monitoring and evaluation approaches, our evaluation program has adapted to the dynamic circumstances presented as our center's progress has been translated from a plan in a grant proposal to implementation.
Subject(s)
Academies and Institutes/organization & administration , Agriculture/organization & administration , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S./standards , Program Evaluation/methods , Academies and Institutes/standards , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/standards , Communication , Guideline Adherence , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Occupational Health , Politics , Stakeholder Participation , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impacts of the Farm to School (FTS) Program on the selection and consumption of fruits and vegetables. DESIGN: Plate waste data were recorded using the visual inspection method before and after implementation of the program. SETTING: Six elementary schools in Florida: 3 treatment and 3 control schools. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11,262 meal observations of National School Lunch Program (NSLP) participants in grades 1-5. INTERVENTION: The FTS Program, specifically local procurement of NSLP offerings, began in treatment schools in November, 2015 after the researchers collected preintervention data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The NSLP participants' selection and consumption of fruits and vegetables. ANALYSIS: Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and proportions tests and difference-in-difference regressions. RESULTS: The NSLP participants at the treatment schools consumed, on average, 0.061 (P = .002) more servings of vegetables and 0.055 (P = .05) more servings of fruit after implementation of the FTS Program. When school-level fixed effects are included, ordinary least squares and tobit regression results indicated that NSLP participants at the treatment schools respectively consumed 0.107 (P < .001) and 0.086 (P < .001) more servings of vegetables, on average, after implementation of the FTS Program. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Local procurement positively affected healthy eating.
Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy/statistics & numerical data , Food Preferences , Fruit , Students/statistics & numerical data , Vegetables , Child , Female , Florida , Food Services , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Male , Poverty , Regression Analysis , SchoolsABSTRACT
The present study examined outcomes for youth in foster care who participated in an asset-based camp designed to build youth assets and facilitate adoption. The study addresses youth perceptions of their assets and the relationship between assets and adoption status. Youth perceived that their assets increased over time and adopted youth reported having more assets than youth who were not adopted. An asset-based approach may lead to positive outcomes for youth in foster care.
