Effect of light-induced changes in leaf anatomy on intercellular and cellular components of mesophyll resistance for CO2 in Fagus sylvatica.

Mesophyll resistance for CO2 diffusion (rm) is one of the main limitations for photosynthesis and plant growth. Breeding new varieties with lower rm requires knowledge of its distinct components. We tested new method for estimating the relative drawdowns of CO2 concentration (c) across hypostomatous leaves of Fagus sylvatica. This technique yields values of the ratio of the internal CO2 concentrations at the adaxial and abaxial leaf side, cd/cb, the drawdown in the intercellular air space (IAS), and intracellular drawdown between IAS and chloroplast stroma, cc/cbd. The method is based on carbon isotope composition of leaf dry matter and epicuticular wax isolated from upper and lower leaf sides. We investigated leaves from tree-canopy profile to analyse the effects of light and leaf anatomy on the drawdowns and partitioning of rm into its inter- (rIAS) and intracellular (rliq) components. Validity of the new method was tested by independent measurements of rm using conventional isotopic and gas exchange techniques. 73% of investigated leaves had adaxial epicuticular wax enriched in 13C compared to abaxial wax (by 0.50‰ on average), yielding 0.98 and 0.70 for average of cd/cb and cc/cbd, respectively. The rIAS to rliq proportion were 5.5:94.5% in sun-exposed and 14.8:85.2% in shaded leaves. cc dropped to less than half of the atmospheric value in the sunlit and to about two-thirds of it in shaded leaves. This method shows that rIAS is minor but not negligible part of rm and reflects leaf anatomy traits, i.e. leaf mass per area and thickness.

Nitrogen depletion enhances endodermal suberization without restricting transporter-mediated root NO3- influx.

Roots vary their permeability to aid radial transport of solutes towards xylem vessels in response to nutritional cues. Nitrogen (N) depletion was previously shown to induce early suberization of endodermal cell walls and reduce hydraulic conductivity of barley roots suggesting reduced apoplastic transport of ions (Armand et al., 2019). Suberization may also limit transcellular ion movement by blocking access to transporters (Barberon et al., 2016). The aim of this study was to confirm that N depletion induced suberization in the roots of barley and demonstrate that this was a specific effect in response to NO3- depletion. Furthermore, in roots with early and enhanced suberization, we assessed their ability for transporter-mediated NO3- influx. N depletion induced lateral root elongation and early and enhanced endodermal suberization of the seminal root of each genotype. Both root to shoot NO3- translocation and net N uptake was half that of plants supplied with steady-state NO3-. Genes with predicted functions in suberin synthesis (HvHORST) and NO3- transport (HvNRT2.2) were induced under N-deplete conditions. N-deplete roots had a higher capacity for high-affinity NO3- influx in early suberized roots than under optimal NO3-. In conclusion, NO3- depletion induced early and enhanced suberization in the roots of barley, however, suberization did not restrict transcellular NO3- transport.

Impact of risk factors on outcomes in early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: an analysis of international staging definitions.

BACKGROUND: In early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), treatment according to the early favorable or unfavorable subgroup is guided by staging definitions, which differ between various study groups worldwide. We analyzed risk factors used in different international staging systems and their impact on the outcome of early-stage HL patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 1173 early-stage HL patients treated homogenously within the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) trials HD10 and HD11, the impact of three staging systems developed and used by the GHSG, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in discriminating risk groups for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed and the relevance of their single risk factors was investigated. RESULTS: All the three staging systems defined an unfavorable risk group out of early-stage patients of comparable size (56%, 55%, and 57%), having a significantly poorer PFS and OS as compared with the corresponding favorable group; 5-year differences between early favorable and early unfavorable in terms of PFS were 9.4% (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.74-3.91), 6.7% (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.41-3.13), and 8.6% (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.45-3.16) with the GHSG, EORTC, and NCCN definition, respectively. Sensitivity was high for all systems (84%, 79%, and 83%); however, there was a low specificity with high rates of false-positive results (1-specificity 54%, 53%, and 55%, respectively). Models of high sensitivity included risk factors associated with large tumor burden and high tumor activity. Most risk factors for tumor-specific end points were also predictive of OS. CONCLUSIONS: Differentiating between a favorable and an unfavorable risk group has significant impact on PFS and OS in early-stage HL patients in the modern treatment era. Risk-adapted treatment strategies using new risk factors with higher specificity are needed.

An individual patient-data comparison of combined modality therapy and ABVD alone for patients with limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with nonbulky stage IA-IIA Hodgkin lymphoma include combined modality therapy (CMT) using doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) plus involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT), and chemotherapy with ABVD alone. There are no mature randomized data comparing ABVD with CMT using modern radiation techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using German Hodgkin Study Group HD10/HD11 and NCIC Clinical Trials Group HD.6 databases, we identified 588 patients who met mutually inclusive eligibility criteria from the preferred arms of HD10 or 11 (n = 406) and HD.6 (n = 182). We evaluated time to progression (TTP), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, including in three predefined exploratory subset analyses. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 91 (HD10/11) and 134 (HD.6) months, respective 8-year outcomes were for TTP, 93% versus 87% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.78]; for PFS, 89% versus 86% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.18) and for overall survival, 95% versus 95% (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.49-2.40). In the exploratory subset analysis including HD10 eligible patients who achieved complete response (CR) or unconfirmed complete response (CRu) after two cycles of ABVD, 8-year PFS was 87% (HD10) versus 95% (HD.6) (HR 2.8; 95% CI 0.64-12.5) and overall survival 96% versus 100%. In contrast, among those without CR/CRu after two cycles of ABVD, 8-year PFS was 88% versus 74% (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.79) and overall survival 95% versus 91%, respectively (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.12-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nonbulky stage IA-IIA Hodgkin lymphoma, CMT provides better disease control than ABVD alone, especially among those not achieving complete response after two cycles of ABVD. Within the follow-up duration evaluated, overall survivals were similar. Longer follow-up is required to understand the implications of radiation and chemotherapy-related late effects. CLINICAL TRIALS: The trials included in this analysis were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: HD10 - NCT00265018, HD11 - NCT00264953, HD.6 - NCT00002561.

Comparing long-term toxicity and efficacy of combined modality treatment including extended- or involved-field radiotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate long-term toxicity and efficacy of a combined modality strategy including extended-field radiotherapy (EF-RT) or involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT), the German Hodgkin Study Group carried out a follow-up analysis in patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand two hundred and four patients were randomized to four cycles of chemotherapy followed by either 30 Gy EF- or 30 Gy IF-RT (HD8 trial); 532 patients in each treatment arm were eligible. RESULTS: At 10 years, no arm differences were revealed with respect to freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) (79.8% versus 79.7%), progression-free survival (79.8% versus 80.0%), and overall survival (86.4% versus 87.3%). Non-inferiority of IF-RT was demonstrated for the primary end point FFTF (95% confidence interval for hazard ratio 0.72-1.25). Elderly patients had a poorer outcome when treated with EF-RT. So far, 15.0% of patients in arm A and 12.2% in arm B died, mostly due to secondary malignancies (5.3% versus 3.4%) or HL (3.2% versus 3.4%). After EF-RT, there were more secondary malignancies overall (58 versus 45), especially acute myeloid leukemias (11 versus 4). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy intensity reduction to IF-RT does not result in poorer long-term outcome but is associated with less acute toxicity and might be associated with less secondary malignancies.

Fertility and gonadal function in female survivors after treatment of early unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD14 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the HD14 trial, 2×BEACOPPescalated+2×ABVD (2+2) has improved the primary outcome. Compared with 4×ABVD, this benefit might be compromised by more infertility in women. Therefore, we analyzed gonadal function and fertility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women≤45 years in ongoing remission at least 1 year after therapy were included. Hormone parameters, menopausal symptoms, measures to preserve fertility, menstrual cycle, pregnancies, and offspring were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty one of 579 women addressed participated (57.2%) and 263 per-protocol treated patients qualified (A=ABVD: 137, B=2+2: 126, mean time after therapy 42 and 43 months, respectively). Regular menstrual cycle after treatment (A: 87%, B: 83%) and time to recovery (≤12 months) were not different. Follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Muellerian hormone were significantly better in arm A. However, pregnancies after therapy favored arm B (A: 15%, B: 26%, P=0.043) and motherhood rates were equivalent to the German normal population. Multivariate analysis revealed prophylactic use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues as highly significant prognostic factor for preservation of fertility (odds ratio=12.87, P=0.001). Severe menopausal symptoms were frequent in women≥30 years (A: 21%, B: 25%). CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal levels after 2+2 indicate a reduced ovarian reserve. However, 2+2 in combination with GnRH analogues does not compromise fertility within the evaluated observation time.

Impact of first- and second-line treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma on the incidence of AML/MDS and NHL--experience of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group analyzed by a parametric model of carcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Using a parametric carcinogenesis model, we disentangle the superimposing effects of primary and relapse therapies of Hodgkin's disease on secondary neoplasias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyze eight randomized trials of the German Hodgkin's lymphoma study group [5357 individuals, 67 secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and 97 secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)]. Primary therapies were divided into four groups: radiotherapy alone, moderately dosed COPP/ABVD-like chemotherapies for intermediate and advanced stages and BEACOPP escalated. RESULTS: For secondary AML/MDS, the hazards after primary therapies are proportional (maximum at 3.4 years), while the hazard after relapse therapy is more peaked (maximum at 1.8 years). Intermediate and advanced stage chemotherapy resulted in a cumulative risk of 1.5%, while the risk after BEACOPP escalated is higher (4.4%, P = 0.004) and comparable with that after relapse therapy (4.5%). For secondary NHL, there are no differences in cumulative risk between the primary therapies (2.9%), while the risk after relapse therapy is increased (6.6%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: BEACOPP escalated moderately increases the risk of secondary AML/MDS but not NHL. No differences were found between other chemotherapies of advanced stages and intermediate stages. Secondary AML/MDS occurs faster after relapse treatment than after primary treatment.

No protection of the ovarian follicle pool with the use of GnRH-analogues or oral contraceptives in young women treated with escalated BEACOPP for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Final results of a phase II trial from the German Hodgkin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The reduction of treatment-related toxic effects is the main goal in the current trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). In this regard, the protection of the ovarian reserve in young women is very important. Therefore, the GHSG investigated the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-analogues (GnRH-a) and oral contraceptives (OC) in young women with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (18-40 years) were randomly assigned either to receive daily OC or monthly GnRH-a during escalated combination therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc). Hormonal levels were determined at baseline, during therapy, and at follow-up. RESULTS: The study was closed prematurely after an interim analysis of 12 patients in arm A (OC) and 11 in arm B (GnRH-a), 9 and 10 are assessable for the primary end point. Women's median age was 25 years in both arms. The anti-Mullerian hormone level after at least 12 months was reduced in all patients. For the entire study cohort, the respective ovarian follicle preservation rate was 0% (95% confidence interval 0% to 12%). CONCLUSION: We observed no protection of the ovarian reserve with hormonal co-treatment during BEACOPPesc. This result supports efforts of ongoing trials to reduce chemotherapy intensity and toxicity. Alternative strategies for the protection of fertility must be offered to young female HL patients before the start of BEACOPPesc therapy.

Assessment of male fertility in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma treated in the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Infertility is one of the most significant side-effects in long-term survivors of successfully treated Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The fertility status was assessed in male HL patients enrolled into trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group from 1988 to 2003. RESULTS: In pre-treatment analysis (n = 202), 20% of patients had normozoospermia, 11% azoospermia and 69% had other dyspermia. In post-treatment analysis (n = 112), 64% of patients had azoospermia, 30% other dyspermia and 6% normozoospermia (P < 0.001). Azoospermia was observed in 90% of patients treated with chemotherapy alone, 67% of those treated with combined modality and 11% of those treated with radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001). Azoospermia was more frequent after 4x cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (COPP/ABVD) (91%), 8x bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (BEACOPP) baseline (93%) and 8x BEACOPP escalated (87%) compared with 2x COPP/ABVD (56%; P = 0.003). There was a statistically significant difference in post-treatment follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels between patients with azoospermia and those with preserved spermatogenesis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the treatment received, male HL patients are at high risk of infertility after treatment. FSH might be used as surrogate parameter for male fertility in future studies.

Poorer outcome of elderly patients treated with extended-field radiotherapy compared with involved-field radiotherapy after chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma: an analysis from the German Hodgkin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of elderly patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is still a matter of debate. Since many of these patients receive combined modality treatment, we evaluated the impact of different radiation field sizes, that is extended-field (EF) or involved-field (IF) technique when given after four cycles of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the multicenter HD8 study of the German Hodgkin Study Group, 1204 patients with early-stage unfavorable HL were randomized to receive four cycles of chemotherapy followed by either radiotherapy (RT) of 30 Gy EF + 10 Gy to bulky disease (arm A) or 30 Gy IF + 10 Gy to bulky disease (arm B). A total of 1064 patients were assessable for the analysis. Of these, 89 patients (8.4%) were 60 years or older. RESULTS: Elderly patients had a poorer risk profile. Acute toxicity from RT was more pronounced in elderly patients receiving EF-RT compared with IF-RT [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3/4: 26.5% versus 8.6%)]. Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF, 64% versus 87%) and overall survival (OS, 70% versus 94%) after 5 years was lower in elderly patients compared with younger patients. Importantly, elderly patients had poorer outcome when treated with EF-RT compared with IF-RT in terms of FFTF (58% versus 70%; P = 0.034) and OS (59% versus 81%; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with early-stage unfavorable HL generally have a poorer risk profile and outcome when compared with younger patients. Treatment with EF-RT instead of IF-RT after chemotherapy has a negative impact on survival of elderly patients and should be avoided.

Could BEACOPP be the new standard for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL)?

In 1992, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) developed the BEACOPP regimen for further improving the outcome of patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Since then, BEACOPP has been introduced in 3 different prospective randomized clinical trials of the GHSG to find an equilibrium between maximal efficacy and least toxicity with the BEACOPP principle for the treatment of advanced stage HL. In the HD9 trial of the GHSG, with 1,186 patients, after a median observation time (mot) of 7 years, the rates for freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) are 85 percent, and for overall survival (OS) 90 percent for dose-escalated BEACOPP, and for COPP/ABVD (C/ABVD comparable to ABVD) the rate for FFTF is 67 percent, and for OS it is 79 percent. These superior BEACOPP results are obtained inspite of a higher rate of secondary AML/MDS in the esc. BEACOPP arm. The number of toxic deaths during treatment, however, was lower for esc. BEACOPP (1.6 percent) than for C/ABVD (1.8 percent). The majority of patients were treated in outpatient setting, in a multicenter study with more than 400 centers, including 120 private doctors, in Germany and 9 other European countries. The reduce acute and longterm toxicity, the GHSG started in the consecutive studies HD12 and HD15 for advanced stage HL to de-escalate BEACOPP by reducing the number of escalated BEACOPP cycles and by applying the baseline-dose BEACOPP, a time-dense regimen, called BEACOPP-14. The excellent results obtained with the BEACOPP principle challenge the seemingly global consensus that ABVD is the gold standard treatment strategy for advanced stage HL.

Cost of illness of malignant lymphoma in Germany.

Cancer causes a high economic burden. The purpose of this study is to determine and compare the direct, indirect and societal costs of illness for Hodgkin's Disease (HD), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Plasmocytoma and Chronic Lymphatic Lymphoma (CLL). We used a database of 1.9 million individuals enrolled in a statutory sickness fund in Germany to identify 4,172 patients treated for malignant lymphoma in 2000. Direct, indirect and societal costs were calculated using a case-control design and the human capital approach. Direct cost (in Euro) for patients with HD was 3604, for NHL patients 6,149, for Plasmocytoma 8,400, and for CLL patients 3,226. Total indirect cost for HD was 69 million, for NHL patients 404 million, for Plasmocytoma 144 million, and for CLL patients 52 million. Totalling 1.7 billion Euro in economic cost for Germany in 2000, with 44,000 productive years lost, malignant lymphomas are a relatively costly disease group. As life expectancy increases, costs for malignant lymphoma are likely to rise due to the high prevalence among the elderly. Further research employing disaggregated, incidence-based cost is needed.

Second malignancy risk associated with treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of the randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite several investigations, second malignancy risks (SMR) following radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CT) and combined chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) remain controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sought individual patient data from randomised trials comparing RT versus CRT, CT versus CRT, RT versus CT or involved-field (IF) versus extended-field (EF) RT for untreated HL. Overall SMR (including effects of salvage treatment) were compared using Peto's method. RESULTS: Data for between 53% and 69% of patients were obtained for the four comparisons. (i) RT versus CRT (15 trials, 3343 patients): SMR were lower with CRT than with RT as initial treatment (odds ratio (OR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.62-0.98 and P = 0.03). (ii) CT versus CRT (16 trials, 2861 patients): SMR were marginally higher with CRT than with CT as initial treatment (OR = 1.38, CI 1.00-1.89 and P = 0.05). (iii) IF-RT versus EF-RT (19 trials, 3221 patients): no significant difference in SMR (P = 0.28) although more breast cancers occurred with EF-RT (P = 0.04 and OR = 3.25). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of CT in addition to RT as initial therapy for HL decreases overall SMR by reducing relapse and need for salvage therapy. Administration of RT additional to CT marginally increases overall SMR in advanced stages. Breast cancer risk (but not SMR in general) was substantially higher after EF-RT. Caution is needed in applying these findings to current therapies.

Could BEACOPP be the new standard for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma?

In 1992, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) developed the BEACOPP regimen for further improving the outcome of patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Since then, BEACOPP has been introduced in 3 different prospective randomized clinical trials of the GHSG to find an equilibrium between maximal efficacy and least toxicity with the BEACOPP principle for the treatment of advanced stage HL. In the HD9 trial of the GHSG, with 1,186 patients, after a median observation time of 7 years, the rates for FFTF are 85 percent and for overall survival 90 percent for dose-escalated BEACOPP, and for COPP/ABVD (C/ABVD comparable to ABVD) the rate for FFTF is 67 percent and for overall survival it is 79 percent. These superior BEACOPP results are obtained inspite of a higher rate of secondary AML/MDS in the escalated BEACOPP arm. The number of toxic deaths during treatment, however, was lower for escalated BEACOPP (1.6 percent) than for C/ABVD (1.8 percent). The majority of patients were treated in an outpatient setting, in a multicenter study with more than 400 centers, including 120 private doctors, located in Germany and 9 other European countries. To reduce acute and long-term toxicity, the GHSG started in the consecutive studies HD12 and HD15 for advanced stage HL to de-escalate BEACOPP by reducing the number of escalated BEACOPP cycles and by applying the baseline dose BEACOPP, a time dense regimen, called BEACOPP-14. The excellent results obtained with the BEACOPP principle challenge the seemingly global consensus that ABVD is the gold standard treatment strategy for advanced stage HL.

[Positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology: a part of medical therapeutic expertise]. / Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie in der Onkologie -- Bestandteil der ärztlichen Behandlungskunst.

Early inclusion of positron emission tomography (PET) in the stepwise oncological diagnosis improves tumor staging and can make further costly diagnostic and inadequate therapeutic measures superfluous. The advantage of this method, in answering the many questions that arise, has been supported by an extensive literature and analysis of interdisciplinary data. Its use is therefore demanded by doctors working in oncology. Surgeons and radiotherapists demand PET studies before local treatment is started so that patients with advanced-stage cancer are spared invasive local therapeutic measures. Oncologists take advantage of PET"s potential to administer stage-related chemotherapy and provide evidence of its efficacy. Expensive treatment regimens can be immediately tested for their efficacy and, if ineffective, can be replaced by a more suitable combination of chemotherapeutic agents. For this purpose combined PET and CT can be considered the (future) standard for oncological diagnosis. Manufacturers have already positioned themselves to provide PET only as part of combined PET/CT equipment. If these advances are not used, patients are deprived of optimal treatment. Furthermore, PET provides considerable potential for cost savings by avoiding expensive measures that do not prolong life. Responsible use of these resources within the health service system requires the early use of PET in the staging of diagnostic methods so that therapeutic options can be weighed through interdisciplinary consultation. The patient can thus be given optimal information and included in therapeutic decisions. It is our obligation as doctors to demand from the decision makers that PET equipment be provided for use in accordance with correct indications and to reimburse the costs as is already the case in other parts of Europe.

[Secondary malignancies after successful primary treatment of malignant Hodgkin's lymphoma]. / Sekundärneoplasien nach erfolgreicher Primärtherapie des malignen Hodgkin-Lymphoms.

Malignant Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) has become a curable disease through the increasing intensity of the treatment strategies applied. These regimens are aggressive, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy leading to the possibility of secondary malignancies. The German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group considered three cohorts including 5,411 patients with all stages of HL. In 127 patients a secondary solid tumor was diagnosed (cumulative risk 2%, median follow-up 72 months), with bronchial carcinomas (23.6%) and colorectal adenocarcinomas (20.5%) being the most frequent neoplasms. Secondary acute myeloid leukemia was found in 36 patients, another ten developed myeloid dysplasia (cumulative risk 1%, median follow-up 55 months). A total of 52 patients revealed a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; cumulative risk 0.9%, median follow-up 46 months). The overall incidence of secondary malignancies was 3.9% in patients who had been treated successfully for their HL with radio- and/or chemotherapy.A secondary NHL can be particularly difficult to be distinguished from the preceding HL. Therefore, in case of a suspected relapse, a complete histopathological work-up must be performed.

Infradiaphragmatic versus supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective review of 1,114 patients.

Infradiaphragmatic Hodgkin lymphoma (IDH) accounts for 4-13% of cases of stage I-II Hodgkin lymphoma (HD). It has been associated with distinct pre-treatment characteristics and outcomes when compared with supradiaphragmatic HD (SDH). The comparison of IDH vs SDH can only be made in early and intermediate stages (I-II), such a comparison is not possible for advanced stages (III-IV). This study retrospectively compared two groups of 1013 patients with stage I-II SDH and 101 patients with IDH (10%). These two sub-groups of patients were treated in 1988-1993 in 2 prospective randomized clinical trials in Germany for early and intermediate stages of Hodgkin lymphoma. IDH-patients were older (median 39 vs 31 years; p < 0.001), predominantly male (73% vs 52%; p < 0.001) and more often had involvement of 3 lymph node areas (LNA) (80% vs 55%; p < 0.001). Histology in IDH was more likely to be mixed cellularity (46.5% vs 23.6%, p < 0.001) or lymphocyte predominant (20 vs 10%, p = 0.003) and less likely nodular sclerosis (25% vs 63%, p < 0.001). In early-stage unfavorable disease, IDH was associated with a higher treatment failure rate (unadjusted hazard ratio 2, 95% CI, 1.3-3.4; p = 0.003). After controlling for age, sex, stage, histology, B-symptoms and involvement of 3 LNA, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.25 (95% CI, 0.65-2.4; p = 0.51) so that IDH was no longer associated with a statistically significant treatment failure rate. Poorer outcomes with IDH as compared to SDH are attributable to its association with known adverse prognostic risk factors, but IDH, in itself, is not an independent adverse prognostic factor for treatment failure or survival.

BEACOPP and COPP/ABVD as salvage treatment after primary extended field radiation therapy of early stage Hodgkins disease - results of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

Patients with early stage favorable Hodgkin's disease who relapse after extended field radiotherapy have satisfactory results. We retrospectively analysed patients with relapsed HD after initial radiation therapy alone to determine treatment outcome and prognostic factors. Nine-hundred and forty five patients in localized stages without risk factors received either 40 Gy extended field RT or 30 Gy EF RT followed by an additional 10 Gy to involved lymph node regions. 107 patients relapsed and received salvage therapy. Characteristics of the 107 patients at relapse were as follows: median age was 34 years (range 18--75) with relapse occuring at a median of 19 months (range 4--98 months), 31% were female. The majority of patients (93%) were treated with conventional chemotherapy. Sixty-nine percent were treated with COPP/ABVD like regimens, 21% with BEACOPP, and 3% received various other regimens. Seven percent were treated with radiotherapy alone. Complete remission was achieved in 87% of all salvaged patients. The median follow-up after relapse was 45 months. FF2F (freedom from second treatment failure) and OS (overall survival) were 81% and 89%, respectively. In multivariate analysis age was the major prognostic factor for FF2F and OS (p<0.0001, for both). Further independent prognostic factors were B symptoms (p=0.05) and salvage chemotherapy (p=0.03) for FF2F, and B symptoms (p=0.03) and extranodal involvement (p=0.02) for OS. The long-term outcome of patients relapsing after EF RT is excellent. Age, B symptoms, extranodal involvement and salvage chemotherapy were identified as prognostic factors for second relapse and survival.