Comparative Genitourinary Safety of In-class Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors among Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The American Heart Association recommended sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, little is known about their real-world in-class comparative safety in patients with HFpEF. We aimed to assess the comparative safety of SGLT2i in the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: This cohort study using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (2012-2020) included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of HFpEF who initiated SGLT2i therapy. Three pairwise comparison groups were established: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the risk of UTI or genital infection separately or as a composite outcome in each cohort. RESULTS: The risk of the composite outcome did not significantly differ between canagliflozin and dapagliflozin (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.14) or between empagliflozin and canagliflozin (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 0.77-2.05). Similarly, there was no evidence of difference between dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in this risk (aHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.48-1.21). The results of analyses separately assessing UTI or genital infection were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the risk of UTI or genital infection among patients with HFpEF who initiated canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are used for the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). It is important to assess their comparative risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) or genital infection among patients with HFpEF. We compared patients with HFpEF using SGLT2i in three pairwise groups: cohort 1, dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin; cohort 2, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin; and cohort 3, dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. We found that there was no significant difference in the risk of genitourinary infections including UTI or genital infections among dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin.

Comparative effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A real-world study.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but little is known about their real-world comparative effectiveness among patients with HFpEF. The objective of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness of SAC/VAL vs ARBs in preventing HF-related hospitalization or all-cause hospitalization among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using IBM MarketScan commercial and Medicare supplemental databases to identify patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of HFpEF and initiation of SAC/VAL (2015-2020) or ARB (2009-2014) therapy. The index date was the date of the first SAC/VAL or ARB prescription fill. After propensity score (PS) matching with a ratio of 1 up to 3, Cox proportional hazards regression was used with robust variance estimators to compare the risks of HF-related hospitalization and all-cause hospitalization between the 2 therapies. Several subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to check the robustness of the main analysis. RESULTS: After PS matching, 2,520 patients (846 receiving SAC/VAL and 1,674 receiving an ARB) were included in the final analyses. After controlling for covariates, there was no difference in the risk of HF-related hospitalization between SAC/VAL and ARB recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.77). There was also no difference in the risk of all-cause hospitalization between SAC/VAL and ARB recipients (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.24). CONCLUSION: Among individuals with private or Medicare Advantage insurance plans, there was no significant difference in the risk of HF-related hospitalization or all-cause hospitalization between adults with HFpEF who received SAC/VAL and those who received ARB therapy.

Trajectories of adherence to extended treatment with direct oral anticoagulants and risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about medication adherence patterns and their association with effectiveness and safety among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy beyond 3-6 months of initial treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between adherence trajectories of extended treatment with DOAC and the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding among patients with VTE. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with incident VTE who completed 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment and received either DOAC extended therapy or no extended therapy using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2013-2019). We used group-based trajectory models to identify distinct adherence patterns during extended treatment. Using inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models, we examined the association between the adherence trajectories and the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 10,960 patients with extended treatment with DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) and 5,133 patients with no extended treatment, we identified 4 distinct trajectories (consistently high, gradually declining, rapidly declining, and no extended treatment). Compared with the no extended treatment group, the groups with consistently high adherence (hazard ratio = 0.09, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17) and with gradually declining adherence (0.13, 0.03-0.53) showed decreased recurrent VTE risk without increased major bleeding risk (consistently high adherence 1.19, 0.71-1.99; gradually declining adherence 1.96, 0.81-4.70). There was no difference in the risk of recurrent VTE (0.34, 0.10-1.16) for the group with rapidly declining adherence, but this group was associated with increased major bleeding risk (2.65, 1.01-6.92). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the clinical importance of continuing and remaining adherent to extended DOAC treatment without increased major bleeding risk for patients with VTE. DISCLOSURES: This research was supported by the BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program. The funding source had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the article for publication. Dr Lo-Ciganic reported receiving research funding from Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Dr Dietrich reported receiving honorarium for training and education from BMS/Pfizer. Dr DeRemer is a stockholder of Portola Pharmaceuticals and reported receiving personal fees for advisory board meeting from BMS. No other disclosures were reported.

Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recommended by the American Heart Association for management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but little is known about their in-class comparative effectiveness in real-world settings. OBJECTIVES: To assess the in-class comparative effectiveness of SGLT2i for preventing HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations among patients with HFpEF. METHODS: Using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental research databases (2012-2020), this cohort study included adults with HFpEF treated with SGLT2i. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations in three pairwise comparisons: dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin, empagliflozin versus canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin versus empagliflozin. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the main analysis. RESULTS: In total, 3629 SGLT2i users (881 dapagliflozin, 1120 canagliflozin, and 1628 empagliflozin) were included. Compared with canagliflozin, dapagliflozin was associated with decreased risk of HF-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.01) and all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.97). Compared with canagliflozin, empagliflozin was associated with 55% decreased risk of HF-related hospitalization (aHR, 0.45; 95% CI 0.34-0.59) and 18% decreased risk of all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.93). Compared with empagliflozin, dapagliflozin was associated with 50% increased risk of HF-related hospitalization (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI 1.09-2.07) and a statistically nonsignificant increase in the risk of all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI 0.92-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with canagliflozin or dapagliflozin use, empagliflozin use was associated with decreased risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations. Compared with canagliflozin, dapagliflozin was associated with a reduced risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations.

Trajectories of adherence to extended treatment with warfarin and risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding.

Background: Little is published about warfarin therapy adherence patterns beyond 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment and their association with effectiveness and safety for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives: To compare the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding during extended treatment between adherence patterns using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2013-2019). Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we included patients with incident VTE who completed an initial 6-month anticoagulant treatment and received either warfarin or no extended therapy. Group-based trajectory models were used to identify distinct extended treatment trajectories. Associations between the trajectories and risk of hospitalization due to recurrent VTE and major bleeding were assessed using inverse probability treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Compared with no extended treatment, consistently high warfarin adherence was associated with a significantly decreased risk of hospitalization due to recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.45), but gradually (HR = 0.29; 95CI, 0.08-1.06) or rapidly declining (HR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-1.24) adherence showed no association with the risk of hospitalization due to recurrent VTE. Compared with no extended treatment, warfarin extended therapy was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization due to major bleeding regardless of adherence patterns (consistently high: HR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.18-3.64, gradually declining: HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 0.74-5.95, and rapidly declining: HR = 9.19; 95% CI, 4.38-19.29). However, compared with rapidly declining adherence, consistently high (HR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.11-0.47) and gradually declining (HR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.64) adherence were associated with decreased risk of hospitalization due to major bleeding. Conclusion: The findings indicated that consistently high adherence to extended warfarin treatment was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization due to recurrent VTE but an increased risk of hospitalization due to major bleeding compared with no extended treatment.

Trajectories of Oral Anticoagulation Adherence and Associated Clinical Outcomes During Long-Term Anticoagulation Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about anticoagulation medication nonadherence patterns impacting effectiveness and safety outcomes in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: We identified adherence trajectories of extended therapy with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin after 6 months initial anticoagulant therapy among Medicare beneficiaries with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We further assessed the associated recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks. METHODS: Using group-based trajectory models, this retrospective cohort study identified distinct beneficiary subgroups with similar adherence patterns of extended-phase anticoagulant treatment (DOACs or warfarin) for patients with VTE who completed 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment. We examined associations between adherence trajectories and risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding using inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared with no extended treatment, consistently high DOAC adherence was associated with decreased recurrent VTE risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.51) without increased major bleeding risk, and consistently high warfarin adherence was associated with decreased recurrent VTE risk (HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.40-0.95) and increased major bleeding risk (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.12-2.41). Gradually declining adherence to DOACs (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.07-3.03) or warfarin (HR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.57-3.47) was associated with increased bleeding risk with no change in recurrent VTE risk. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This real-world evidence suggests persistently adhering to extended DOAC therapy is associated with lower recurrent VTE risk without increasing major bleeding among Medicare beneficiaries with VTE. Persistently adhering to extended warfarin therapy was associated with lower recurrent VTE risk but higher major bleeding risk.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin among patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism.

The comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulant therapies to prevent a second recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the benefits and harms of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin therapies in preventing second recurrent VTE and major bleeding events among patients with a recurrent VTE episode following anticoagulation therapy for incident VTE. A retrospective cohort analysis of two large national insurance claims databases was conducted for patients with two episodes of VTE. Cox proportional hazards models were used after inverse probability treatment weighting to compare risks of second recurrent VTE and major bleeding events. Compared with warfarin, DOAC therapy was associated with significantly decreased risk of second recurrent VTE with no significant difference in risk of major bleeding events. Our findings suggest that, compared with warfarin, DOACs may reduce risk of second VTE recurrence among patients who have experienced one recurrence.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of extended anticoagulant therapy among Medicare beneficiaries with venous thromboembolism.

Guidelines recommend an extended course of anticoagulation therapy for patients who experienced venous thromboembolism (VTE) without transient provocation, however, optimal duration remains uncertain. We assessed effectiveness and safety of extended use of apixaban and warfarin greater than 6 months of initial treatment in patients with VTE. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged greater than or equal to 18 years with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Patients were required to have initiated anticoagulants within 30 days of their first VTE diagnosis, completed 6 months of initial anticoagulant treatment, and received extended phase treatment with apixaban (the apixaban group) or warfarin (the warfarin group) or no extended therapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling with inverse probability treatment weighting was used to compare recurrent VTE, mortality, and major bleeding risks among the three groups. Mean extended-treatment duration was up to 10 months and 14 months in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Compared with no extended treatment, apixaban use was associated with decreased risks of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.08, [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-0.41]) and mortality (HR = 0.37, [95% CI: 0.27-0.51]) without increased major bleeding risk (HR = 1.29, [95% CI: 0.68-2.45]); warfarin use was associated not with recurrent VTE risk change but with increased major bleeding risk (HR = 2.14, [95% CI: 1.26-3.65]) and decreased mortality risk (HR = 0.39, [95% CI: 0.29-0.51]). Compared with warfarin, apixaban use was associated with decreased recurrent VTE (HR = 0.13, [95% CI: 0.03-0.63]) and major bleeding (HR = 0.56, [95% CI: 0.32-0.98]) risks. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses (e.g., intention-to-treat) findings remained consistent. Compared with warfarin or no extended therapy, extended-apixaban use was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VTE without increased major bleeding risk. Continuing anticoagulant therapy with apixaban greater than 6 months may be effective and safe.

Trends in pharmacotherapy utilization among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Study objective: Half of patients with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Over the years, guidelines have recommended or advised against various therapies for HFpEF management. However, there is limited evidence on the trends in utilization of the various medications. The aim of this study was to examine the trends in the use of pharmacotherapies among patients with HFpEF from 2008 through 2020. Design: Retrospective cohort study of patients with HFpEF used MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (2007-2020). Participants: Patients with HFpEF. Outcome measures: Utilization rates for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARAs), diuretics, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), nitrates, digoxin, and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) within 90 days of the first HFpEF diagnosis. Results: We identified 156,730 patients with HFpEF (mean [SD] age, 73 [13.4] years; 57 % females). From 2008 to 2020, we found increased utilization rates for ARNIs (0.02 % vs. 0.17 % of all patients, p < 0.01), ARBs (14.3 % vs. 18.6 %, p < 0.01), ARAs (7.0 % vs. 8.4 %, p < 0.01), CCBs (30.6 % vs. 33.4 %, p < 0.01), and SGLT2i (0.001 % vs. 0.021 %, p < 0.01). By contrast, the utilization of ACEIs (30.4 % vs. 20.5 %, p < 0.01), digoxin (9.5 % vs. 2.4 %, p < 0.01), nitrates (10.7 % vs. 4.9 %, p < 0.01), diuretics (54.1 % vs. 50.4 %, p = 0.20), and ß-blockers (52.6 % vs. 51.7 %, p < 0.01) decreased, while utilization rates of PDE5Is remained stable (1.5 % vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.90) . Conclusions: During the 13-year study period, the utilization of ARNIs, ARBs, ARAs, CCBs, and SGLT2i increased while the utilization of digoxin, nitrates, diuretics, and ß-blockers decreased among patients with HFpEF.

Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Limited real-world evidence exists for effectiveness and safety of extended oral anticoagulation beyond 6 months of initial treatment in prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and adverse major bleeding events among patients with VTE. Using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2013-2019), we conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding events during extended treatment among patients with VTE who completed the 6-month initial treatment and received extended oral anticoagulant treatment with apixaban, warfarin, or no extended treatment. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards modeling with inverse probability treatment weighting. We identified 14,818 patients with extended treatment of apixaban (n = 4,338), warfarin (n = 5,298), or no extended treatment (n = 5,182). Compared with no extended treatment, apixaban use was associated with decreased risk of recurrent VTE (HR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04-0.26) without increased risk of major bleeding events (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.52-2.17); warfarin use was associated with decreased risk of recurrent VTE (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.12-0.44) but with increased risk of major bleeding events (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.51-4.59). Compared with warfarin, apixaban use was associated with decreased risk of major bleeding events (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.80) but no difference in risk of recurrent VTE (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.15-1.36). In a real-world clinical setting, extended anticoagulation with apixaban or warfarin was associated with decreased risk of recurrent VTE compared with no extended treatment, and apixaban had a better safety profile with fewer major bleeding events compared with warfarin among commercially insured patients with VTE.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety for low versus full dose of apixaban during extended phase oral anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of apixaban therapy to prevent asecondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) event remains unconfirmed. To investigate the effects of extended phase use of apixaban (2.5 vs. 5 mg twice daily) beyond 6 months of initial treatment on the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding events among patients with a history of VTE. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of two large national insurance claims databases was conducted for patients diagnosed with VTE. Cox proportional hazard models after propensity score matching were used to compare the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. RESULTS: There were no detected differences in recurrent VTE or major bleeding events between patients prescribed low versus full dose apixaban. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily is an alternative option for extended phase therapy for risk reduction of VTE recurrence compared to apixaban 5 mg twice daily.

Effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus aldosterone antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin receptor antagonist therapy for prevention of heart failure (HF)-related hospitalization and all-cause hospitalization in a large cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. DATA SOURCE: IBM® MarketScan® research databases (2014-2018). PATIENTS: Patients aged 18 years or older with their first HFrEF hospitalization on or after January 1, 2015, who initiated sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin receptor antagonist after hospital discharge. INTERVENTION: Sacubitril/Valsartan versus Angiotensin receptor antagonist. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The index date was the first sacubitril/valsartan or angiotensin receptor antagonist fill date. After 1 up to 3 propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards regression was used with robust variance estimators to compare HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations between treatments. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the main analysis. After propensity score matching, 1,088 sacubitril/valsartan and 2,839 angiotensin receptor antagonist new users were included. The crude incidence of HF-related hospitalization was 13 per 100 person-years for sacubitril/valsartan users and 18 per 100 person-years for angiotensin receptor antagonist users. Compared with angiotensin receptor antagonist use, sacubitril/valsartan use was associated with 27% lower risk of HF-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.91; p = 0.006) and 31% lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.79; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant heterogeneity, including subpopulations with chronic kidney disease or coronary artery disease. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with angiotensin receptor antagonists, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations. Our data suggest that, when added sequentially, sacubitril/valsartan should be the preferred initial agent over angiotensin receptor antagonists.

Out-of-Pocket Payment for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Commercially Insured in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines increasingly recommended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for hypertension diagnosis and management. Yet, ABPM is used infrequently in the United States, possibly because of low insurance coverage and high patient costs. We sought to analyze out-of-pocket payments (OPPs) for ABPM among privately insured patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using IBM® MarketScan® commercial claims of beneficiaries aged ≥18 years receiving ABPM from January 2012 to December 2018. The date of first ABPM claim (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes 93784, 93786, 93788, or 93790) was considered the index date. Patients with 12 months of continuous enrollment preindex and 30-day postindex were included. Per beneficiary OPP was calculated by aggregating all ABPM-related OPPs within the 30-day postindex window (ABPM episode). RESULTS: Of 22,317 beneficiaries receiving ABPM, 62% had $0 OPP and 38% had OPP >$0. Among the latter, median OPP per beneficiary for an ABPM episode was $23 (interquartile range [IQR], $14, $32), driven primarily by full ABPM claims (median, $22; IQR, $14, $24). Among individual components, scan analysis and report claims (median, $25; IQR, $13, $49) had the greatest OPP. The median OPP per ABPM episode did not change substantively from 2012 through 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Among commercially insured in the United States, nearly 4-in-10 have an OPP for ABPM. Though most OPPs are relatively modest, some patients incur substantial OPP. Our findings highlight the need for policymakers to ensure adequate ABPM coverage in the commercial insurance marketplace.

Design and Early Implementation Successes and Challenges of a Pharmacogenetics Consult Clinic.

Pharmacogenetic testing (PGT) is increasingly being used as a tool to guide clinical decisions. This article describes the development of an outpatient, pharmacist-led, pharmacogenetics consult clinic within internal medicine, its workflow, and early results, along with successes and challenges. A pharmacogenetics-trained pharmacist encouraged primary care physicians (PCPs) to refer patients who were experiencing side effects/ineffectiveness from certain antidepressants, opioids, and/or proton pump inhibitors. In clinic, the pharmacist confirmed the need for and ordered CYP2C19 and/or CYP2D6 testing, provided evidence-based pharmacogenetic recommendations to PCPs, and educated PCPs and patients on the results. Operational and clinical metrics were analyzed. In two years, 91 referred patients were seen in clinic (mean age 57, 67% women, 91% European-American). Of patients who received PGT, 77% had at least one CYP2C19 and/or CYP2D6 phenotype that would make conventional prescribing unfavorable. Recommendations suggested that physicians change a medication/dose for 59% of patients; excluding two patients lost to follow-up, 87% of recommendations were accepted. Challenges included PGT reimbursement and referral maintenance. High frequency of actionable results suggests physician education on who to refer was successful and illustrates the potential to reduce trial-and-error prescribing. High recommendation acceptance rate demonstrates the pharmacist's effectiveness in providing genotype-guided recommendations, emphasizing a successful pharmacist-physician collaboration.

Trends in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use for confirmation or monitoring of hypertension and resistant hypertension among the commercially insured in the U.S., 2008-2017.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been increasingly recommended for diagnosis confirmation and monitoring in patients with new-onset hypertension and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). We assessed insurance claims submitted for ABPM among a nationally representative sample of commercially insured U.S. patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using the IBM MarketScan® commercial claims database from January 2008-December 2017, including 2 populations: those with incident treated hypertension (ITH; first antihypertensive filled) or aTRH (first overlapping use of 4 antihypertensive agents). We identified ABPM claims filed within 6 months before to 6 months after the qualifying antihypertensive fill and determined prevalence of ABPM use overall and by year in each population. RESULTS: In total, 2,820,303 patients met ITH criteria and 298,049 met aTRH criteria. Of those with ITH, 7650 (2.7 per 1000 persons) had ≥1 ABPM claim submitted, and annual ABPM prevalence ranged from 2.0 to 3.7 per 1000 persons, increasing over time (P trend<0.0001). Among those with aTRH, 630 (2.1 per 1000 persons) had ≥1 ABPM claim submitted, and annual ABPM prevalence ranged from 1.6 to 2.7 per 1000 persons, decreasing over time (P trend = 0.054). Timing of ABPM claims suggested they were used primarily for diagnosis confirmation in ITH, and more evenly distributed between diagnosis confirmation and monitoring in aTRH. CONCLUSIONS: Despite guideline recommendations for more widescale use, ABPM appears to be used rarely in the U.S., with fewer than 0.5% of commercially insured patients with newly treated hypertension or aTRH having ABPM claims submitted to their insurance.

Evaluation of SAMe-TT2R2 Score on Predicting Success With Extended-Interval Warfarin Monitoring.

BACKGROUND: In patients with stable international normalized ratios, 12-week extended-interval warfarin monitoring can be considered; however, predictors of success with this strategy are unknown. The previously validated SAMe-TT2R2 score (considering sex, age, medical history, treatment, tobacco, and race) predicts anticoagulation control during standard follow-up (every 4 weeks), with lower scores associated with greater time in therapeutic range. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the SAMe-TT2R2 score in predicting success with extended-interval warfarin follow-up in patients with previously stable warfarin doses. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of a single-arm feasibility study, baseline SAMe-TT2R2 scores were calculated for patients with ≥1 extended-interval follow-up visit. The primary analysis assessed achieved weeks of extended-interval follow-up according to baseline SAMe-TT2R2 scores. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients receiving chronic anticoagulation completed a median of 36 weeks of extended-interval follow-up. The median baseline SAMe-TT2R2 score was 1 (range 0-5). Lower SAMe-TT2R2 scores appeared to be associated with greater duration of extended-interval follow-up achieved, though the differences between scores were not statistically significant. No individual variable of the SAMe-TT2R2 score was associated with achieved weeks of extended-interval follow-up. Analysis of additional patient factors found that longer duration (≥24 weeks) of prior stable treatment was significantly associated with greater weeks of extended-interval follow-up completed ( P = 0.04). Conclusion and Relevance: This pilot study provides limited evidence that the SAMe-TT2R2 score predicts success with extended-interval warfarin follow-up but requires confirmation in a larger study. Further research is also necessary to establish additional predictors of successful extended-interval warfarin follow-up.

Patient satisfaction with extended-interval warfarin monitoring.

Extended-interval monitoring of warfarin has been proposed to reduce follow-up burden and improve patient satisfaction. We aimed to make an initial assessment of anticoagulation satisfaction before and after an extended-interval warfarin monitoring intervention. We conducted a translational prospective single-arm pilot study of extended-interval warfarin monitoring in five pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics. Patients meeting CHEST guideline criteria for extended-interval warfarin monitoring began progressive extended-interval follow-up (6, 8, and 12 weeks thereafter). The Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) was administered at baseline and at end-of-study or study removal (in patients no longer appropriate for extended interval follow-up). Forty-six patients had evaluable pre- and post-intervention DASS survey data. Mean age of patients was 66.5 years, 74 % were non-Hispanic whites, and 48 % were men. Patients completed a mean ± SD of 34 ± 22 weeks of follow-up. Mean ± SD total DASS score at baseline was 45.2 ± 14.2 versus 49.1 ± 14.9 at end-of-study (mean change, +3.9 [95 % CI -0.6-8.4; p = 0.09]), indicating no benefit-and trending toward decrement-to anticoagulation satisfaction. Change in anticoagulation satisfaction varied substantially following extended-interval monitoring, with no evidence of improved satisfaction. Plausible reasons for patients not preferring extended-interval monitoring include increased anxiety and disengagement from self-management activities, both potentially related to less frequent feedback and reassurance during extended interval-monitoring. Additional research is needed to identify who is likely to benefit most from extended-interval monitoring. Anticoagulation satisfaction should be considered with clinical factors and shared-decision making when implementing extended-interval warfarin monitoring.