The influence of oblique viewing on axial and peripheral refraction for emmetropes and myopes.

Refraction may be affected by the forces of lids and extraocular muscles when eye direction and head direction are not aligned (oblique viewing) which might potentially influence past findings on peripheral refraction of the eye. We investigated the effect of oblique viewing on axial and peripheral refraction. In a first experiment, cycloplegic axial refractions were determined when subjects' heads were positioned to look straight-ahead through an open-view autorefractor and when the heads were rotated to the right or left by 30 degrees with compensatory eye rotation (oblique viewing). Subjects were 16 young emmetropes (18-35 years), 22 young myopes (19-36 years) and 15 old emmetropes (45-60 years). In a second experiment, cycloplegic peripheral refraction measurements were taken out to +/-34 degrees horizontally from fixation while the subjects rotated their heads to match the peripheral refraction angles (eye in primary position with respect to the head) or the eyes were rotated with respect to the head (oblique viewing). Subjects were 10 emmetropes and 10 myopes. We did not find any significant changes in axial or peripheral refraction upon oblique viewing for any of the subject groups. In general for the range of horizontal angles used, it is not critical whether or not the eye is rotated with respect to the head during axial or peripheral refraction.

Biopsychosocial determinants of health-related quality of life after ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) the influences of psychosocial variables and of extraintestinal manifestations of ulcerative colitis (UC) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have not been studied so far. METHODS: 61 patients with UC (age 52.7+/-13.9 years; 47% female) completed the German version of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-D), the Short Form Health Survey (SF - 36), the German version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and the Giessener Symptom List (GBB 24). Independent of their current clinical activity 37 patients underwent endoscopies. Pouchitis was defined by the Pouch Disease Activity Score (PDAI) > or = 7. Where possible, IPAA-patients were compared with the data for the German general population and with a clinical sample of patients with UC and no IPAA. RESULTS: Patients with IPAA complained more about fatigue and arthralgia and a reduced physical and mental health (SF-36) than the German general population (P < 0.01). The IBDQ-total score could be predicted (adjusted R2 = 29.1, P < 0.01) by the number of operations due to IPAA-related complications (beta = -18.8) and HADS-D-Anxiety scores > or = 11 (beta = -29.1). The IBDQ-subscale score "Bowel" could be predicted (adjusted R2 = 13.7, P = 0.04) by PDAI > or = 7 (beta = -9.2) and the subscale score "Systemic" (adjusted R2 = 13.3, P = 0.04) by the number of extraintestinal manifestations (beta = -1.9). CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL of patients with UC and IPAA is determined not only by IPAA-related factors but also by anxiety and extraintestinal manifestations with associated musculoskeletal pain.