Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
FEBS Open Bio ; 7(3): 414-423, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28286737

ABSTRACT

Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase (SCD) catalyzes the Δ9-cis desaturation of saturated fatty acids (SFA) to generate monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA). This enzyme is highly up-regulated by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) in human fibroblasts. Accordingly, the analysis of cellular fatty acids by gas chromatography showed that PDGF significantly increased the proportion of MUFA, particularly palmitoleate, in cellular lipids. To further analyze the role of SCD in fibroblasts, we used small hairpin RNA targeting SCD (shSCD), which decreased the MUFA content. SCD down-regulation blunted the proliferation of fibroblasts in response to PDGF. This was confirmed using a pharmacological inhibitor of SCD. In addition, proliferation was blocked by palmitate and stearate (two SCD substrates) but not by palmitoleate and oleate (two SCD products). In the presence of an equal amount of oleate, palmitate had no effect on cell proliferation. SCD inhibition or down-regulation did not decrease PDGF receptor activity or signaling. However, by measuring plasma membrane lipid lateral diffusion by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we showed that the modulation of the MUFA/SFA ratio by PDGF and SCD inhibitor was related to modifications of membrane fluidity. Altogether, our data suggest that SCD is required for the response of normal fibroblasts to growth factors.

2.
Lancet Oncol ; 17(11): 1521-1532, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27686946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outcome of low-grade glioma (WHO grade II) is highly variable, reflecting molecular heterogeneity of the disease. We compared two different, single-modality treatment strategies of standard radiotherapy versus primary temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with low-grade glioma, and assessed progression-free survival outcomes and identified predictive molecular factors. METHODS: For this randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study (EORTC 22033-26033), undertaken in 78 clinical centres in 19 countries, we included patients aged 18 years or older who had a low-grade (WHO grade II) glioma (astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma) with at least one high-risk feature (aged >40 years, progressive disease, tumour size >5 cm, tumour crossing the midline, or neurological symptoms), and without known HIV infection, chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection, or any condition that could interfere with oral drug administration. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either conformal radiotherapy (up to 50·4 Gy; 28 doses of 1·8 Gy once daily, 5 days per week for up to 6·5 weeks) or dose-dense oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 once daily for 21 days, repeated every 28 days [one cycle], for a maximum of 12 cycles). Random treatment allocation was done online by a minimisation technique with prospective stratification by institution, 1p deletion (absent vs present vs undetermined), contrast enhancement (yes vs no), age (<40 vs ≥40 years), and WHO performance status (0 vs ≥1). Patients, treating physicians, and researchers were aware of the assigned intervention. A planned analysis was done after 216 progression events occurred. Our primary clinical endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat; secondary outcomes were overall survival, adverse events, neurocognitive function (will be reported separately), health-related quality of life and neurological function (reported separately), and correlative analyses of progression-free survival by molecular markers (1p/19q co-deletion, MGMT promoter methylation status, and IDH1/IDH2 mutations). This trial is closed to accrual but continuing for follow-up, and is registered at the European Trials Registry, EudraCT 2004-002714-11, and at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00182819. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2005, and March 26, 2010, 707 patients were registered for the study. Between Dec 6, 2005, and Dec 21, 2012, we randomly assigned 477 patients to receive either radiotherapy (n=240) or temozolomide chemotherapy (n=237). At a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 31-56), median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI 35-44) in the temozolomide group and 46 months (40-56) in the radiotherapy group (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·9-1·5, p=0·22). Median overall survival has not been reached. Exploratory analyses in 318 molecularly-defined patients confirmed the significantly different prognosis for progression-free survival in the three recently defined molecular low-grade glioma subgroups (IDHmt, with or without 1p/19q co-deletion [IDHmt/codel], or IDH wild type [IDHwt]; p=0·013). Patients with IDHmt/non-codel tumours treated with radiotherapy had a longer progression-free survival than those treated with temozolomide (HR 1·86 [95% CI 1·21-2·87], log-rank p=0·0043), whereas there were no significant treatment-dependent differences in progression-free survival for patients with IDHmt/codel and IDHwt tumours. Grade 3-4 haematological adverse events occurred in 32 (14%) of 236 patients treated with temozolomide and in one (<1%) of 228 patients treated with radiotherapy, and grade 3-4 infections occurred in eight (3%) of 236 patients treated with temozolomide and in two (1%) of 228 patients treated with radiotherapy. Moderate to severe fatigue was recorded in eight (3%) patients in the radiotherapy group (grade 2) and 16 (7%) in the temozolomide group. 119 (25%) of all 477 patients had died at database lock. Four patients died due to treatment-related causes: two in the temozolomide group and two in the radiotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Overall, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival in patients with low-grade glioma when treated with either radiotherapy alone or temozolomide chemotherapy alone. Further data maturation is needed for overall survival analyses and evaluation of the full predictive effects of different molecular subtypes for future individualised treatment choices. FUNDING: Merck Sharpe & Dohme-Merck & Co, Canadian Cancer Society, Swiss Cancer League, UK National Institutes of Health, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, US National Cancer Institute, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Research Fund.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/therapy , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Glioma/therapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Adult , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Glioma/mortality , Humans , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Temozolomide
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 51(12): 1497-510, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26025767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current debate on overdiagnosis and overtreatment of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) urges the need for prospective studies to address this issue. A substantial number of DCIS lesions will never form a health hazard, particularly if it concerns non- to slow-growing low-grade DCIS. The LORD study aims to evaluate the safety of active surveillance in women with low-risk DCIS. DESIGN: This is a randomised, international multicentre, open-label, phase III non-inferiority trial, led by the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG 2014-04) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-BCG 1401). Standard treatment will be compared to active surveillance in 1240 women aged ⩾ 45 years with asymptomatic, screen-detected, pure low-grade DCIS based on vacuum-assisted biopsies of microcalcifications only. Both study arms will be monitored with annual digital mammography for a period of 10 years. The primary end-point is 10-year ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free percentage. Secondary end-points include patient reported outcomes, diagnostic biopsy rate during follow-up, ipsilateral mastectomy rate and translational research. FEASIBILITY: To explore interest in and feasibility of the LORD study we conducted a survey among EORTC and BOOG centres. A vast majority of EORTC and BOOG responding centres expressed interest in participation in the LORD study. The proposed study design is endorsed by nearly all centres.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis , Watchful Waiting , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis/diagnosis , Prospective Studies
4.
J Biol Chem ; 284(16): 10334-42, 2009 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19244250

ABSTRACT

FOXO (Forkhead box O) transcription factors induce cell growth arrest and apoptosis, which can be prevented by FOXO phosphorylation by AKT in response to growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). In addition to this well characterized post-translational modification, we showed that FOXO1, FOXO3, and FOXO4 were also regulated at the transcriptional level. PDGF, fibroblast growth factors (FGF), and IGF-I repressed the expression of FOXO genes in human fibroblasts. This process was sensitive to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition by LY294002. FOXO1-specific shRNA decreased FOXO1 mRNA expression and enhanced fibroblast proliferation, mimicking the effects of growth factors. Conversely, ectopic FOXO3 activation blocked the proliferation of fibroblasts and induced the expression of FOXO1, FOXO4, and p27-KIP1. Using luciferase reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitations, we identified a conserved FOXO-binding site in the promoter of the FOXO1 gene, which was required for regulation by PDGF, and mediated the up-regulation of FOXO1 by itself and by FOXO3. Altogether, our results suggest that the expression of FOXO1 and FOXO4 genes is stimulated by FOXO3 and possibly by other FOXO factors in a positive feedback loop, which is disrupted by growth factors.


Subject(s)
Forkhead Transcription Factors , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/metabolism , Platelet-Derived Growth Factor/metabolism , Transcription Factors , Transcription, Genetic , Active Transport, Cell Nucleus/physiology , Animals , Cell Cycle Proteins , Cells, Cultured , Fibroblasts/cytology , Fibroblasts/physiology , Forkhead Box Protein O1 , Forkhead Box Protein O3 , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Forkhead Transcription Factors/metabolism , Humans , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA Interference , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcriptional Activation
5.
Biochem J ; 400(1): 179-88, 2006 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16831124

ABSTRACT

In the present study, we aimed to decipher the mechanisms involved in the transcriptional effect of insulin on the SREBP-1c specific promoter of the human srebf-1 gene. Using luciferase reporter gene constructs in HEK-293 cells (human embryonic kidney cells), we demonstrated that the full effect of insulin requires the presence of SREs (sterol response elements) in the proximal region of the promoter. Furthermore, insulin increases the binding of SREBP-1 (sterol-regulatory-element-binding protein-1) to this promoter region in chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. We also found that the nuclear receptors LXRs (liver X receptors) strongly activate SREBP-1c gene expression and identified the LXRE (LXR-response element) involved in this effect. However, our results suggested that these LXREs do not play a major role in the response to insulin. Finally, using expression vectors and adenoviruses allowing ectopic overexpressions of the human mature forms of SREBP-1a or SREBP-1c, we demonstrated the direct role of SREBP-1 in the control of SREBP-1c gene expression in human skeletal-muscle cells. Altogether, these results strongly suggest that the SREBP-1 transcription factors are the main mediators of insulin action on SREBP-1c expression in human tissues.


Subject(s)
Insulin/pharmacology , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Response Elements/genetics , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1/genetics , Adipose Tissue/drug effects , Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Binding Sites/genetics , Cell Line , Cells, Cultured , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Insulin/administration & dosage , Muscle, Skeletal/cytology , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Mutation/genetics , Perfusion , Protein Binding , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1/metabolism , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2/genetics , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2/metabolism
6.
Dig Dis Sci ; 51(5): 986-95, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16642426

ABSTRACT

Liver fibrosis is characterized by an activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC). During primary culture HSC evolve from a quiescent into an activated phenotype which is characterized by alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) up-regulation, increase in cell growth, and extracellular matrix secretion. HSC culture with trans-resveratrol can lead to deactivation of myofibroblast-like HSC. We used an HSC line, PAV-1, to check the role of retinol and palmitic acid in the deactivation process of HSC. Using mass and metabolic-based methods, Western blot and immunocytochemistry assays, we demonstrated that treatment with palmitic acid (75 muM) alone or in combination with retinol (2 muM) significantly decreased cell proliferation and alpha-SMA expression. We also established that the association of both compounds strongly decreased collagen type I expression. Our results suggest the potential use of palmitic acid alone or in combination with retinol to induce HSC deactivation.


Subject(s)
Actins/metabolism , Collagen Type I/metabolism , Liver/drug effects , Palmitic Acid/pharmacology , Vitamin A/pharmacology , Actins/drug effects , Animals , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cell Line , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Collagen Type I/drug effects , Liver/cytology , Liver/metabolism , Liver Cirrhosis , Rats
7.
J Lipid Res ; 46(4): 697-705, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15627654

ABSTRACT

The sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) is regarded as a major factor involved in the nutritional regulation of lipogenesis. The aim of the present work was to demonstrate its involvement in the response of key genes of glucose and lipid metabolism in liver, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle during fasting and refeeding. The regulation of hexokinase-2 (HKII) was investigated as a marker of the glucose metabolic pathway and that of FAS was investigated as a marker of the lipogenic pathway. The in vivo association of SREBP-1 with the promoter regions of these genes was determined in the different tissues using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Fasting decreased, and refeeding restored, FAS and HKII mRNA and protein levels in each tissue. The concomitant measurement of SREBP-1a and SREBP-1c mRNA levels, of mature SREBP-1 protein abundance in nuclear extracts, and of SREBP-1 interaction with target promoters led to the conclusion that SREBP-1 plays a major role in the response of FAS and HKII genes to nutritional regulation in rodents. These data elucidate the important role of SREBP-1 not only in the regulation of lipid metabolism but also of glucose metabolism and energy homeostasis.


Subject(s)
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Fasting/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation , Hexokinase/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic/genetics , fas Receptor/genetics , Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Animal Feed , Animals , CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins/genetics , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Liver/metabolism , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1 , Transcription Factors/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...