Assessing capacity and obtaining consent for thrombolysis for acute stroke.

When offering treatment to a patient with capacity they should be informed of the risks and benefits of therapy and consent should be obtained. For patients without capacity, treatment is given in their 'best interests'. Achieving and assessing capacity to consent for treatment in the presence of acute illness can be difficult and especially so in patients suffering with acute stroke. This article presents patients' and doctors' perspectives on assessing capacity to consent to thrombolytic therapy for stroke.

Implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in elderly care departments across: a survey of 13 hospitals shows wide variability in practice.

OBJECTIVE: The United Kingdom Department of Health advises hospitals that they should implement a policy relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) that takes account of published guidelines relating to decision making for resuscitation. We wished to see if these guidelines were leading to implementation of a similar policy in different Elderly Care (EC) departments. SETTING: The acute and rehabilitation wards in 13 hospitals from the South Thames West region. DESIGN: On one day the notes of all in-patients, over 55 years, under the care of an EC physician were reviewed. RESULTS: A CPR decision had been made in 465 (47%) of the 990 in-patients, 379 Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) orders were made. The percentage of patients in whom a CPR decision had been made varied from 15 to 97% between departments. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the guidelines for decision making for resuscitation varies greatly across this region of the United Kingdom.

Influence of guidelines on CPR decisions: an audit of clerking proforma.

We audited documentation rates and implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions for patients admitted under the Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon, as new guidelines and a proforma were introduced. For the first audit, data were collected from 75 departmental discharges. Following introduction of a proforma, six point prevalence audits were performed of all elderly care inpatients. Consultant documentation improved from 27/75 (36%) to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 133/140 (95%), 96/119 (81%), 148/157 (94%) and 167/169 (98%) in audits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively. The percentages of decisions that were Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) were 64% 72%, 45%, 68% and 62% in audits 3 to 7 respectively. For audit 5 our guidelines required discussion with patient before making a DNAR order, whereas the guidelines applicable for the other audits did not stipulate discussion. The fall in documentation rates and proportion of CPR decisions that were DNAR in audit 5 were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, diagnosis, cognitive function or disability between patients in those audits (3-7) when these parameters were recorded. Introducing a proforma significantly improved CPR decision documentation. Obligatory discussion with a patient before issuing a DNAR order was associated with a fall in documentation of decisions.

The influence of new guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions. Five cycles of audit of a clerk proforma which included a resuscitation decision.

Current guidelines advise discussion with patients before issuing a 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) order. We report five audit cycles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) documentation after introducing a proforma, the last cycle following the latest guidelines. In first audit data were collected from 75 patient discharges. CPR decisions were documented in 27 (36%). Four subsequent point prevalence audits carried out on all inpatients following proforma introduction showed documentation improved to 102/109 (94%), 135/148 (91%), 131/140 (94%) and 102/119 (86%) in cycles two, three, four and five, respectively. The last three audits also revealed that consultants consistently made more DNAR orders than trainee doctors. However, following the introduction of the latest guidelines the proportion of patients in whom a decision was made, and the percentage of those decisions that were DNAR, fell.