Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Radiol ; 14(5): 809-16, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14615904

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative MR mammography could predict the extent of breast cancer in patients with dense breasts or whether dense parenchyma will lead to false-positive or inconclusive examinations. Sixty-seven patients with dense breasts with a malignant breast tumor planned for conservative surgery were reviewed. Detection rates of mammography, ultrasound, and MR mammography were studied, and the diameters of the lesions were measured and compared with pathological examination. Pathology revealed breast cancer in 65 patients. Sensitivity for detection of index lesions was 83% for mammography, 70.8% for ultrasound, and 98% for MR mammography. Mammography underestimated tumor extent in 37%, ultrasound in 40%, and MR in 12.5%. Of the 20 patients (31%) with multifocal or multicentric carcinoma, mammography detected the lesions in 35%, ultrasound in 30%, and MR in 100%, with a false-positive rate of 12.5, 14, and 23%. The MR mammography is more accurate in assessing tumor extent and multifocality in patients with dense breasts, but benign changes may lead to false-positive examinations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Fibrocystic Breast Disease/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Preoperative Care/methods , Ultrasonography, Mammary/methods , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , False Positive Reactions , Female , Fibrocystic Breast Disease/pathology , Humans , Mammography/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Physical Examination , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...