The lateral femoral notch sign: a reliable diagnostic measurement in acute anterior cruciate ligament injury.

PURPOSE: To describe the validity and inter- and intra-observer reliability of the lateral femoral notch sign (LFNS) as measured on conventional radiographs for diagnosing acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. METHODS: Patients (≤ 45 years) with a traumatic knee injury who underwent knee arthroscopy and had preoperative radiographs were retrospectively screened for this case-control study. Included patients were assigned to the ACL injury group (n = 65) or the control group (n = 53) based on the arthroscopic findings. All radiographs were evaluated for the presence, depth and location of the LFNS by four physicians who were blind to the conditions. To calculate intra-observer reliability, each observer re-assessed 25% of the radiographs at a 4-week interval. RESULTS: The depth of the LFNS was significantly greater in ACL-injured patients than in controls [median 0.8 mm (0-3.1 mm) versus 0.0 mm (0-1.4 mm), respectively; p = 0.008]. The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities of the LFNS depth were 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. Secondary knee pathology (i.e., lateral meniscal injury) in ACL-injured patients was correlated with a deeper LFNS [median 1.1 mm (0-2.6 mm) versus 0.6 mm (0-3.1 mm), p = 0.012]. Using a cut-off value of 1 mm for the LFNS depth, a positive predictive value of 96% was found. CONCLUSION: This was the first study to investigate the inter- and intra-observer agreement of the depth and location of the LFNS. The depth of the LFNS had a very high predictive value for ACL-injured patients and could be used in the emergency department without any additional cost. A depth of > 1.0 mm was a good predictor for ACL injury. Measuring the depth of the LFNS is a simple and clinically relevant tool for diagnosing ACL injury in the acute setting and should be used by clinicians in patients with acute knee trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II.

Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate the effect of intravenous contrast media on bone mineral density (BMD) assessment by comparing unenhanced and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examinations performed for other indications. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients (99 without and 53 with malignant neoplasm) who underwent both unenhanced and two contrast-enhanced (arterial and portal venous phase) abdominal CT examinations in a single session between June 2011 and July 2013 were included. BMD was evaluated on the three examinations as CT-attenuation values in Hounsfield Units (HU) in the first lumbar vertebra (L1). RESULTS: CT-attenuation values were significantly higher in both contrast-enhanced phases, compared to the unenhanced phase (p < 0.01). In patients without malignancies, mean ± standard deviation (SD) HU-values increased from 128.8 ± 48.6 HU for the unenhanced phase to 142.3 ± 47.2 HU for the arterial phase and 147.0 ± 47.4 HU for the portal phase (p < 0.01). In patients with malignancies, HU-values increased from 112.1 ± 38.1 HU to 126.2 ± 38.4 HU and 130.1 ± 37.3 HU (p < 0.02), respectively. With different thresholds to define osteoporosis, measurements in the arterial and portal phase resulted in 7-25% false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that intravenous contrast injection substantially affects BMD-assessment on CT and taking this into account may improve routine assessment of low BMD in nonquantitative CT. KEY POINTS: • Routine CT may gain a role in bone attenuation measurements for osteoporosis • Contrast media injection has substantial influence on CT-derived bone density • Contrast-enhanced CT leads to underestimation of osteoporosis compared to unenhanced CT • Adjusting for contrast injection phase may improve CT screening protocols for osteoporosis.