Comparison of OBGYN postgraduate curricula and assessment methods between Canada and the Netherlands: an auto-ethnographic study.

Introduction: Although the Dutch and the Canadian postgraduate Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) medical education systems are similar in their foundations [programmatic assessment, competency based, involving CanMED roles and EPAs (entrustable professional activities)] and comparable in healthcare outcome, their program structures and assessment methods considerably differ. Materials and methods: We compared both countries' postgraduate educational blueprints and used an auto-ethnographic method to gain insight in the effects of training program structure and assessment methods on how trainees work. The research questions for this study are as follows: what are the differences in program structure and assessment program in Obstetrics and Gynecology postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands and Canada? And how does this impact the advancement to higher competency for the postgraduate trainee? Results: We found four main differences. The first two differences are the duration of training and the number of EPAs defined in the curricula. However, the most significant difference is the way EPAs are entrusted. In Canada, supervision is given regardless of EPA competence, whereas in the Netherlands, being competent means being entrusted, resulting in meaningful and practical independence in the workplace. Another difference is that Canadian OBGYN trainees have to pass a summative written and oral exit examination. This difference in the assessment program is largely explained by cultural and legal aspects of postgraduate training, leading to differences in licensing practice. Discussion: Despite the fact that programmatic assessment is the foundation for assessment in medical education in both Canada and the Netherlands, the significance of entrustment differs. Trainees struggle to differentiate between formative and summative assessments. The trainees experience both formative and summative forms of assessment as a judgement of their competence and progress. Based on this auto-ethnographic study, the potential for further harmonization of the OBGYN PGME in Canada and the Netherlands remains limited.

Rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac during trial of labour after caesarean section.

Rupture of the vaginal wall in unobstructed labour is a rare entity in the developed world. This case report describes rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac in a healthy 34-year-old multiparous woman attempting trial of labour after caesarean section. The woman presented to the labour ward at term with spontaneous onset of contractions. In the second stage of labour, the woman experienced sudden severe abdominal pain, different in character from the contraction pain. Therefore, the baby was delivered by ventouse extraction. As the woman continued to experience severe immobilising abdominal pain during the hospital stay, a CT scan was performed which revealed a haematoma and free fluid at the right side of the uterus. A laparotomy was performed 3 days postdelivery, during which a rupture of the posterior cul-de-sac was found and closed with a continuous suture. The woman was discharged 3 days after laparotomy in good clinical condition.

The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that complaints after episiotomy repair depend on the method and material used for repair. The objective of our study was to determine which of two frequently used suture materials, Monocryl® (poliglecaprone 25) and Vicryl Rapide™ (polyglactin 910), is superior for intracutaneous closure of the skin in mediolateral episiotomies. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial performed in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2013 250 primiparous women with uncomplicated mediolateral episiotomies were randomly allocated to intracutaneous skin closure with either Monocryl® or Vicryl Rapide™. All other layers were sutured with Vicryl 2-0 and Vicryl 0 in both groups. Pain scores and complications were documented using questionnaires during the first three months post partum. The primary outcome was pain 10 days after delivery in sitting position established by Visual Analogous Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were pain scores at different time points and reported complications such as infections, dehiscence and dyspareunia one day, 10 days, six weeks and three months after delivery. RESULTS: Of 250 allocated women 54% returned questionnaires. No statistical difference was found between both groups for the primary outcome (VAS 2,8 (95% CI 2,18-3,44) vs. VAS 2,5 (95% CI 2,00-2,98), p = 0,43). With regard to secondary outcomes only self-reported dehiscence was significantly different, favouring Monocryl® (10% vs. 25%, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Use of Monocryl® 3-0 and Vicryl Rapide™ 3-0 for intracutaneous closure of the skin after mediolateral episiotomy leads to equal pain scores ten days after delivery and therefore both materials may be considered for this use. Monocryl® 3-0 might be favourable over Vicryl Rapide™ 3-0 due to less self-reported dehiscence after intracutaneous closure of the skin in mediolateral episiotomies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered under trial nr. ISRCTN29869308 on 20-04-2016.

Temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries to prevent massive hemorrhage during cesarean delivery among patients with placenta previa.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery before uterine incision to prevent massive obstetric hemorrhage during cesarean delivery among patients with anterior placenta previa. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study conducted at Amphia Hospital Breda (Breda, Netherlands), data were analyzed from women with anterior placenta previa who delivered by cesarean between January 1, 2001, and September 30, 2012. Cases with and without balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery were included. The primary outcomes were the amount of blood loss during cesarean delivery, drop of hemoglobin level, and blood loss of more than 1000 mL. RESULTS: Of 68 eligible women, 42 (62%) had temporary balloon occlusion and 26 (38%) had no balloon occlusion. Median blood loss was 800 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 488-1113) in the balloon group and 1000 mL (IQR 694-1307) in the no balloon group (P=0.06). Blood loss of 1000 mL or more was recorded in 16 (38%) women in the balloon group and 18 (69%) in the no balloon group (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac artery before uterine incision during cesarean delivery could potentially reduce blood loss among patients with anterior placenta previa. Large, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results.

Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate spontaneous vaginal delivery and complication rates after induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter in women with a previous cesarean delivery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Secondary teaching hospital in the second largest city of the Netherlands. POPULATION: Women with a history of cesarean delivery (n = 208), undergoing induction of labor with a Foley catheter in a subsequent pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The women who had induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter in the Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, between January 2003 and January 2012, were identified in a computerized database. Patient's records were checked for accuracy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaginal delivery rate, cesarean section rate, uterine rupture and maternal and neonatal (infectious) morbidity. RESULTS: Of the women 60% had a spontaneous vaginal delivery and 11% were delivered by vacuum extraction. Uterine rupture occurred in one woman. Postpartum hemorrhage was the most common maternal complication (12%). Maternal intrapartum and postpartum infections occurred in 5% and 1%. Proven neonatal infection was found in 3% of the cases. Two perinatal deaths occurred (1%), of which one was related to uterine rupture. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor with a transcervical Foley catheter is an effective method to achieve vaginal delivery in women with a previous cesarean delivery. There is a low risk of uterine rupture and maternal and neonatal (infectious) morbidity in this cohort.

An exploratory study into the effect of time-restricted internet access on face-validity, construct validity and reliability of postgraduate knowledge progress testing.

BACKGROUND: Yearly formative knowledge testing (also known as progress testing) was shown to have a limited construct-validity and reliability in postgraduate medical education. One way to improve construct-validity and reliability is to improve the authenticity of a test. As easily accessible internet has become inseparably linked to daily clinical practice, we hypothesized that allowing internet access for a limited amount of time during the progress test would improve the perception of authenticity (face-validity) of the test, which would in turn improve the construct-validity and reliability of postgraduate progress testing. METHODS: Postgraduate trainees taking the yearly knowledge progress test were asked to participate in a study where they could access the internet for 30 minutes at the end of a traditional pen and paper test. Before and after the test they were asked to complete a short questionnaire regarding the face-validity of the test. RESULTS: Mean test scores increased significantly for all training years. Trainees indicated that the face-validity of the test improved with internet access and that they would like to continue to have internet access during future testing. Internet access did not improve the construct-validity or reliability of the test. CONCLUSION: Improving the face-validity of postgraduate progress testing, by adding the possibility to search the internet for a limited amount of time, positively influences test performance and face-validity. However, it did not change the reliability or the construct-validity of the test.

Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a transcervical Foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin E2 inserts for term induction of labour. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial in five hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with a singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation, intact membranes, unfavourable cervix, and no prior caesarean section were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated by a web-based randomization system to induction of labour with a 30 ml Foley catheter or 10mg slow-release vaginal prostaglandin E2 inserts in a 1:1 ratio. Due to the nature of the intervention this study was not blinded. The primary outcome was the caesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and time from intervention to birth. Additionally, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of similar studies. RESULTS: We analyzed 226 women: 107 received a Foley catheter and 119 inserts. Caesarean section rates were comparable (20% versus 22%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.54-1.50). Secondary outcomes showed no differences. We observed no serious maternal or neonatal morbidity. Meta-analysis showed comparable caesarean section rates, but significantly fewer cases of hyperstimulation during the ripening phase when a Foley catheter was used. CONCLUSIONS: We found, in this relatively small study, no differences in effectiveness and safety of induction of labour with a Foley catheter and 10mg slow release vaginal prostaglandin E2 inserts. Meta-analysis confirmed a comparable caesarean section rate, and showed fewer cases of hyperstimulation when a Foley catheter was used.

A qualitative study on trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education.

INTRODUCTION: Recent changes in postgraduate medical training curricula usually encompass a shift towards more formative assessment, or assessment for learning. However, though theoretically well suited to postgraduate training, evidence is emerging that engaging in formative assessment in daily clinical practice is complex. AIM: We aimed to explore trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of what factors determine active engagement in formative assessment. METHODS: Focus group study with postgraduate trainees and supervisors in obstetrics and gynaecology. RESULTS: Three higher order themes emerged: individual perspectives on feedback, supportiveness of the learning environment and the credibility of feedback and/or feedback giver. CONCLUSION: Engaging in formative assessment with a genuine impact on learning is complex and quite a challenge to both trainees and supervisors. Individual perspectives on feedback, a supportive learning environment and credibility of feedback are all important in this process. Every one of these should be taken into account when the utility of formative assessment in postgraduate medical training is evaluated.

An exploratory study into the impact and acceptability of formatively used progress testing in postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology.

Part of recent reforms of postgraduate medical training in the Netherlands is the introduction of formatively intended knowledge testing or progress testing. We previously evaluated the construct validity and reliability of postgraduate progress testing. However, when assessment is intended to be formative, the acceptability of the test (scores) and the educational impact that is achieved are at least as important in the utility of this assessment format. We developed a questionnaire targeted at both educational supervisors and postgraduate trainees, containing questions on general acceptability, educational impact and acceptability of test content. 90 % of trainees and 84 % of educational supervisors completed the questionnaire. The general acceptability of formatively used progress testing is good; however, the self-reported educational impact is limited. Furthermore, trainees query the validity of test content. Formatively intended progress testing is well accepted; however the impact is limited. We discuss the importance of feedback quality and the effect of grading. Furthermore we start a debate on whether, for a genuine effect on learning, formative assessment should have consequences, either by entwining the assessment with the training programme or by linking the assessment to a summative standard.

Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure. Both mechanical (eg, Foley catheters) and pharmacological methods (eg, prostaglandins) are used for induction of labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of induction of labour with a Foley catheter with induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals in the Netherlands between Feb 10, 2009, and May 17, 2010. We enrolled women with a term singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, intact membranes, an unfavourable cervix, an indication for induction of labour, and no prior caesarean section. Participants were randomly allocated by an online randomisation system to induction of labour with a 30 mL Foley catheter or vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (1:1 ratio). Because of the nature of the intervention this study was not blinded. The primary outcome was caesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and time from intervention to birth. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. We also did a meta-analysis that included our trial. The trial was registered with the Dutch trial registry, number NTR 1646. FINDINGS: 824 women were allocated to induction of labour with a Foley catheter (n=412) or vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (n=412). Caesarean section rates were much the same between the two groups (23%vs 20%, risk ratio [RR] 1·13, 95% CI 0·87-1·47). A meta-analysis including our trial data confirmed that a Foley catheter did not reduce caesarean section rates. We recorded two serious maternal adverse events, both in the prostaglandin group: one uterine perforation and one uterine rupture. INTERPRETATION: In women with an unfavourable cervix at term, induction of labour with a Foley catheter is similar to induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 gel, with fewer maternal and neonatal side-effects. FUNDING: None.

Assessment of competence and progressive independence in postgraduate clinical training.

CONTEXT: At present, competency-based, outcome-focused training is gradually replacing more traditional master-apprentice teaching in postgraduate training. This change requires a different approach to the assessment of clinical competence, especially given the decisions that must be made about the level of independence allowed to trainees. METHODS: This study was set within postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology training in the Netherlands. We carried out seven focus group discussions, four with postgraduate trainees from four training programmes and three with supervisors from three training programmes. During these discussions, we explored current opinions of supervisors and trainees about how to determine when a trainee is competent to perform a clinical procedure and the role of formal assessment in this process. RESULTS: When the focus group recordings were transcribed, coded and discussed, two higher-order themes emerged: factors that determine the level of competence of a trainee in a clinical procedure, and factors that determine the level of independence granted to a trainee or acceptable to a trainee. CONCLUSIONS: From our study, it is evident that both determining the level of competence of a trainee for a certain professional activity and making decisions about the degree of independence entrusted to a trainee are complex, multi-factorial processes, which are not always transparent. Furthermore, competence achieved in a certain clinical procedure does not automatically translate into more independent practice. We discuss the implications of our findings for the assessment of clinical competence and provide suggestions for a transparent assessment structure with explicit attention to progressive independence.

[Diagnostic image. A woman in childbed with itch and vesicles]. / Een kraamvrouw met jeuk en blaasjes.

A 37-year-old woman in childbed developed gestational pemphigoid.

Serum vascular endothelial growth factor: a prognostic factor in cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To study pre-treatment serum VEGF of patients with invasive cervical cancer and its possible role as prognostic indicator. METHODS: VEGF was measured using ELISA in the largest patient group (n = 167) to date. RESULTS: Serum VEGF was significantly higher in advanced tumor stage (P = 0.01), large tumor size (tumors larger than 2 cm) (P = 0.03), and the presence of vascular space invasion (P = 0.05). Serum VEGF was associated with disease free and overall survival [DFS: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.61; 95% CI 1.32-5.17; P = 0.006; for OS: HR = 2.09; 95% CI 1.54-2.84; P < 0.001, respectively]. In multivariate Cox regression serum VEGF retained its prognostic value for DFS (HR = 2.10, P = 0.03) and OS (HR = 1.92, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Serum VEGF levels correlate with more advanced and more aggressive disease in cervical cancer and may be a useful prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer.

Expression of osteotropic growth factors and growth hormone receptor in a canine distraction osteogenesis model.

Osteotropic growth factors play an important role in bone metabolism. Nevertheless, knowledge about their expression in relation to distraction osteogenesis remains limited. The aim of the present study was to determine the expression of growth hormone (GH), growth hormone receptor (GHR), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II), and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in distraction-induced bone regeneration. Expression of these factors was assessed during the consolidation phase, comparing distraction osteogenesis with osteotomy-induced bone formation. Real-time PCR was performed as a semiquantitative measurement of mRNA, and the relative expression levels of these factors were determined. In addition, plasma GH profiles and plasma concentrations of IGF-I, IGF-II, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 and -6 (IGFBP-4 and -6) were measured to assess their potential systemic role during bone formation. Expression of GHR, IGF-I, and BMP-2 had significantly increased in comparison with the expression of these factors in mature bone. Expression of GHR was significantly higher in distraction-induced bone regenerate than in osteotomy-induced bone. No significant differences were found for the expression of IGF-I and BMP-2 between distraction and osteotomy. Plasma concentrations of GH, IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-4, and IGFBP-6 did not demonstrate any significant differences between treatment groups and controls. Upregulation of GHR expression in distraction osteogenesis may enhance sensitivity to endogenous systemic GH and thus promote consolidation of the regenerated bone. Changes in the systemic osteotropic growth factors GH, IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-4, and IGFBP-6 do not seem to be of importance during distraction osteogenesis.

Expression of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system and steroidogenic enzymes in canine testis tumors.

Testis tumors occur frequently in dogs. The main types of tumors are Sertoli cell tumors, seminomas, and Leydig cell tumors. Mixed tumors and bilateral occurrence of tumors may be encountered frequently. To elucidate the possible relationship between the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system and the development of different types of testis tumors in dogs, the expression of insulin-like growth factor-I and II (IGF-I and IGF-II), their type I receptor (IGF-IR), and their binding proteins (IGFBPs) was examined. In addition the expression of the steroidogenic enzymes p450-aromatase and 5alpha-reductase type I and type II, and the androgen receptor (AR) was investigated by a semiquantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Both normal testes and testes with tumors were studied. In normal testes a clear expression of IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF-IR, IGFBP2, IGFBP4 and IGFBP5 was found. Expression of IGFBP1 and IGFBP3 was weak. There was also clear expression of the steroidogenic enzymes 5alpha-reductase, aromatase, and the AR. Quantification of RT-PCR products revealed significantly less expression of IGFBP1, IGF-I, and 5alpha-reductase type I in Sertoli cell tumors and seminomas. Leydig cell tumors and mixed tumors had a significantly higher expression of IGFBP4 and IGF-IR than normal testes. The expression of aromatase was lower in seminomas and in mixed tumors. The expression of AR, IGF-II and IGFBP2, IGFBP3, IGFBP5, and 5alpha-reductase type II did not differ among the different types of tumors. It was concluded that Sertoli cell tumors and seminomas have a comparable expression of the IGF system while Leydig cell tumors have a different pattern, suggesting difference in pathobiology among these types of tumors.