Predicting personal cardiovascular disease risk based on family health history: Development of expert-based family criteria for the general population.

In inherited and familial cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), relatives without current symptoms can still be at risk for early and preventable cardiovascular events. One way to help people evaluate their potential risk of CVD is through a risk-assessment tool based on family health history. However, family criteria including inherited CVD risk to be used by laypersons are non-existent. In this project, we employed a qualitative study design to develop expert-based family criteria for use in individual risk assessment. In the first phase of the project, we identified potential family criteria through an online focus group with physicians with expertise in monogenic and/or multifactorial CVDs. The family criteria from phase one were then used as input for a three-round Delphi procedure carried out in a larger group of expert physicians to reach consensus on appropriate criteria. This led to consensus on five family criteria that focus on cardiovascular events at young age (i.e., sudden death, any CVD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, aortic aneurysm) and/or an inherited CVD in one or more close relatives. We then applied these family criteria to a high-risk cohort from a clinical genetics department and demonstrated that they have substantial diagnostic accuracy. After further evaluation in a general population cohort, we decided to only use the family criteria for first-degree relatives. We plan to incorporate these family criteria into a digital tool for easy risk assessment by the public and, based on expert advice, will develop supporting information for general practitioners to act upon potential risks identified by the tool. Results from an expert focus group, a Delphi method in a larger group of experts, and evaluation in two cohorts were used to develop family criteria for assessing cardiovascular disease risk based on family health history for a digital risk-prediction tool for use by the general population. CVD Cardiovascular disease, ICD Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, TAA Thoracic aortic aneurysm, AAA Abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Distribution of decidual mast cells in fetal growth restriction and stillbirth at (near) term.

INTRODUCTION: Placental pathology and pregnancy complications are associated with unfavorable regulation of the maternal immune system. Although much research has been performed towards the role of immune cells like macrophages and T cells in this context, little is known about the presence and function of mast cells (MC). MC can be sub classified in tryptase-positive (MCT) and tryptase- and chymase-positive (MCTC). This study investigates the presence of MC in the decidua of pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) and stillbirth (SB). METHODS: Placental tissue from FGR (n = 250), SB (n = 64) and healthy pregnancies (n = 42) was included. Histopathological lesions were classified according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group criteria. Tissue sections were stained for tryptase and chymase. Decidual MC were counted manually, and the results were expressed as number of cells/mm2 decidual tissue. RESULTS: A significant lower median number of MCTC was found in the decidua of FGR (0.40 per mm2; p < 0.001) and SB (0.51 per mm2; p < 0.05) compared to healthy controls (1.04 per mm2). No difference in MCT number (1.19 per mm2, 1.88 per mm2 and 1.37 per mm2 respectively) was seen between the groups. There was no difference in number of MCT and MCTC between placental pathological lesions. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a shift in decidual MC balance towards MCT in pregnancy complications. No difference in numbers of MC subtypes was found to be related to histopathologic lesions.