ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the pathological characteristics and prognostic influencing factors of T1 invasive ductal breast carcinoma with calcification.Methods The clinicopathological and follow-up data in 172 patients with initially treated operable T1 invasive ductal breast cancer in this hospital from June 2012 to June 2013 were analyzed restrospectively.The patients were divided into the calcification group and non-calcification group based on the breast X-ray image features.The differences of pathological characteristics between two groups,related factors,and relationship between the calcification expression with patient survival were analyzed.Results The pathological types,lymph node metastasis,Her-2 overexpression,TNM stage and Ki-67 had statistically significant difference between the calcification group and non-calcification group(P＜0.05).The multivariate analysis showed that the cases type,lymph node metastasis and Ki-67 were the related risk factors affecting the calcification expression(P＜0.05).The 3-year disease-free survival rate in the the calcifi cation group and non-calcification group were 87.30％ and 95.06％ respectively.The lymph node status and calcification were the independent predictive risk factors affecting the disease-free survival time of invasive ductal breast carcinoma(P＜0.05).Conclusion Calcification is visible X-ray risk factor of T1 invasive ductal breast carcinoma prognosis.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched from inception to February 14, 2016. Sensitivity, specificity, and other information were extracted from the included studies. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled by a bivariate mixed-effects binary regression model. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed. Heterogeneity and publication bias were explored by Higgins and Deeks tests, respectively. RESULTS: Seven studies including 768 women with 886 lesions were analyzed. The summary sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-98%), 77% (95% CI, 66%-85%), and 57 (95% CI, 12-267), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 91% (95% CI, 89%-94%). No significant heterogeneity or publication bias existed. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography is useful for differentiating breast lesions. Especially, its sensitivity is excellent.
