Correlation between severity of obesity and mortality in cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality despite the development of risk stratification tools and new treatment strategies. Obesity, although a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is not included in current risk stratification tools for CS. A relationship between mortality and obesity has only been shown in subsets populations of CS; there is not yet a clear relationship between severity of obesity and all-cause CS. OBJECTIVES: In this study we evaluate the relationship between rising body mass index (BMI) and mortality in all-cause CS. METHODS: All patients with BMI measurements and hospitalizations complicated by CS from 2014 to 2019 at a single quaternary care institution were identified. Patients were grouped by obesity classification. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine a relationship between higher obesity classifications with 30-day mortality in patients with CS. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were available for analysis. Mean BMI for those who survived compared to those who did not was 29.7 ± 8 kg/m2 vs 33.7 ± 7.6 kg/m2 (p = 0.04). The odds ratio for mortality with incremental increase in obesity classification was 1.6 (95% CI 1.1 - 2.6, p = 0.03) after adjusting for etiology of CS and other common associations with CS mortality. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the higher mortality risk with incremental increases in BMI should be taken into account when risk stratifying these patients.

Differences in right ventricular morphology, not function, indicate the nature of increased afterload in pulmonary hypertensive subjects with normal left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND: The aim of study was to assess whether a specific morphology of the right ventricle (RV) by 2D echo predicts the hemodynamic nature of pulmonary hypertension (PH). METHODS: We reviewed clinical, 2D echo, and hemodynamic data of 100 patients with PH: divided into three groups: PH from pulmonary vascular disease (PHPVD ; n = 34) with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 3 mm Hg/L/min (Wood unit [WU]) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mm Hg, pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH; n = 33) with PVR < 3 WU and PAWP > 15 mm Hg and PHMIXED (n = 33) with PVR > 3 WU and PAWP > 15 mm Hg. We analyzed several two-dimensional parameters of right heart morphology and function, including the degree of tapering of the RV diameter from base (just above tricuspid annulus) to apex (level of moderator band) in the apical four-chamber view. P = <.05. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in all three groups: age 62 ± 14.4 years, 69% females, 57% Caucasians. Hemodynamics and 2D echo data of PHPVD vs PVH vs PHMIXED were as follows: PVR 13 ± 6 vs 2 ± 1 vs 7 ± 2 WU, mean pulmonary artery pressure 53 ± 14 vs 34 ± 8 vs 49 ± 8 mm Hg and cardiac index 2.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.8 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.7 L/m2 , RV base/apex ratio during systole (sRVb/a ) 1.3 ± 0.2 vs 2.6 ± 0.5 vs 1.5 ± 0.3. Thus, sRVb/a was twofold higher in the PVH vs PHPVD cohort. On ROC analysis, the AUC for sRVb/a for predicting PVR > 3 WU was 0.873, with optimal cutoff of 1.5. CONCLUSION: Systolic RV base/apex ratio is a simple 2D index of RV shape that powerfully predicts a PVR > 3 WU and provides powerful discriminating ability between PVH and PHPVD .

The Inappropriate Prescription of Oral Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Hospital Setting: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.

UNLABELLED: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to treat upper gastrointestinal tract disorders. Their efficacy and perceived safety have led to widespread prescription. This is not without effect, in terms of adverse events and resource utilization. AIM: To prospectively assess oral PPI prescription in hospitalized patients. METHODS: PPI prescription in consecutive hospitalized patients was assessed. Indication and dose were assessed by patient interview and medical record review. Comparisons with current published prescribing guidelines were made. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-seven patients were included. 57.5 % were prescribed PPIs. 26.8 % prescriptions were for inappropriate or unclear indications. 68.4 % were on higher doses than guidelines recommended, of which 41.6 % could have undergone dose reduction, and 26.5 % discontinued. In a multivariate analysis, age, gender, and length of stay had no association with PPI prescription. Although aspirin use was appropriately associated with PPI prescription (RR: 1.8, 95 % CI 1.127-3.69; p < 0.05), the PPI was often given at higher than recommended doses (p < 0.001). This may reflect older age and multiple risk factors in this subset. Surgical patients commenced more PPIs and at higher dosages (p < 0.001). Omeprazole and lansoprazole were most often inappropriately prescribed (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Inappropriate PPI therapy is still a problem in hospitals, though it appears to be at a lower level compared with previous studies. Awareness of evidence-based guidelines and targeted medicine reconciliation strategies are essential for cost-effective and safe use of these medications.