Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of aclidinium bromide administered twice daily in healthy volunteers.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airway obstruction and increased cholinergic tone. The global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend long-acting anticholinergics for COPD maintenance treatment. Aclidinium bromide is a novel, long-acting muscarinic antagonist developed for the treatment of COPD. A phase I, randomized, single-blind, multiple-dose clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple doses of twice-daily (BID) aclidinium in healthy subjects. Thirty healthy male and female subjects received aclidinium 200 µg, 400 µg, 800 µg, or placebo twice daily for 7 days. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 cohorts and 10 subjects in each cohort were randomized (8:2) to either aclidinium or placebo groups. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs), laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and ECGs. Plasma samples were obtained at multiple time points throughout the study and analyzed for aclidinium and its inactive acid and alcohol metabolites using a fully validated method of liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 9 treatment-emergent AEs were reported (1, placebo; 3, aclidinium 400 µg; 5, aclidinium 800 µg), all of which were mild in severity. No serious AEs were reported. There were no clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters or vital signs. PK parameters on Day 7 following BID dosing of aclidinium showed that steady state was achieved for aclidinium and its metabolites. On Days 1 and 7, maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of aclidinium were generally observed at the first PK time point (5 min postdose) and rapidly declined, with plasma concentrations generally less than 10% of Cmax by 6 h postdose in all aclidinium groups. Mean effective t(½) after the evening dose on Day 7 ranged from 4.6 to 7.0 h for aclidinium 400 µg and 800 µg, similar to the terminal t(½) observed on Day 1 (4.5-5.9 h). Exposure for aclidinium and both metabolites increased with increasing dose, with the increase in exposure being less than dose proportional between the 400 µg and 800 µg doses. Overall, all doses of aclidinium were safe and well tolerated throughout the study. Pharmacokinetic steady state was reached for aclidinium and both metabolites within the 7-day treatment period for all doses tested. Aclidinium bromide exhibited time-independent PK following dosing to steady state, indicating that similar concentration versus time profiles will occur after repeated administration at the same dose and frequency.

The influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin.

OBJECTIVE: Vildagliptin is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor that improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by increasing alpha- and beta-cell responsiveness to glucose. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin in patients with hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, parallel-group study in patients with mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 4) hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (n = 6). All subjects received a single 100-mg oral dose of vildagliptin, and plasma concentrations of vildagliptin and its main pharmacologically inactive metabolite LAY151 were measured up to 36 h post-dose. RESULTS: Exposure to vildagliptin (AUC(0-infinity) and C(max)) decreased non-significantly by 20 and 30%, respectively, in patients with mild hepatic impairment [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): AUC(0-infinity), 0.80 (0.60, 1.06), p = 0.192; C(max), 0.70 (0.46, 1.05), p = 0.149]. Exposure to vildagliptin was also decreased non-significantly in patients with moderate hepatic impairment [-8% for AUC(0-infinity), geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.92 (0.69, 1.23), p = 0.630; -23% for C(max), geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.77 (0.51, 1.17), p = 0.293]. In patients with severe hepatic impairment, C(max) was 6% lower than that in healthy subjects [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.94 (0.59, 1.49), p = 0.285], whereas AUC(0-infinity) was increased by 22% [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 1.22 (0.89, 1.68), p = 0.816). Across the hepatic impairment groups, LAY151 AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were increased by 29-84% and 24-63%, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. The single 100-mg oral dose of vildagliptin was well tolerated by patients with hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in exposure to vildagliptin in patients with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment; therefore, no dose adjustment of vildagliptin is necessary in patients with hepatic impairment.

FTY720 pharmacokinetics in mild to moderate hepatic impairment.

The influence of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on FTY720 pharmacokinetics was assessed. The authors enrolled 32 subjects consisting of 8 with mild and 8 with moderate hepatic impairment based on Child-Pugh criteria and 16 demographically matched control subjects. A single 1-mg oral dose of FTY720 was administered under fasting conditions. Blood, plasma, and urine samples were obtained over a 14-day period for measurement of FTY720 and metabolite concentrations and protein binding. Total blood lymphocyte counts and heart rate were serially monitored to assess pharmacologic responses to FTY720. Peak FTY720 blood concentrations were similar across groups. Oral clearance (CL/F) was reduced 10% in mild hepatic impairment (P = .493) and 31% in moderate hepatic impairment (P = .034). There were no significant differences in blood exposure to the hexanoic or butanoic acid metabolites among groups. The effect of FTY720 on blood lymphocytes was similar across groups, with a mean decrease of 44% from the predose value. Like-wise, the effect of FTY720 on supine heart rate was similar across groups, with a mean 13% decrease from the predose rate occurring 2 to 4 hours postdose and recovering within 1 to 2 days. Although hepatic impairment elicited changes in the disposition of FTY720, the magnitude of these changes suggests that the FTY720 dose does not need to be adjusted in mild or moderate hepatic-impaired patients.

Influence of hepatic impairment on everolimus pharmacokinetics: implications for dose adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressant everolimus to provide dose recommendations for clinical use. METHODS: In this open-label, single-dose, case-control study, 8 subjects with liver cirrhosis classed as moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score, 7-9) and 8 demographically matched healthy control subjects received a single oral 2-mg dose of everolimus. Routine safety assessments were made, and blood samples were taken for determination of everolimus concentrations and protein binding. RESULTS: The apparent clearance of everolimus was significantly reduced by 53% in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects (9.1 +/- 3.1 versus 19.4 +/- 5.8 L/h). This was manifested by a 115% higher area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) (245 +/- 91 versus 114 +/- 45 ng. h/ml) and 84% prolonged half-life (79 +/- 42 versus 43 +/- 18 hours) in subjects with hepatic impairment. The rate of absorption of everolimus was not altered by hepatic impairment on the basis of the maximum blood concentration (C(max)) and time to reach C(max) (t(max)). Protein binding was similar in the two groups (73.8% +/- 3.6% versus 73.5% +/- 2.4%). A significant positive correlation of the everolimus AUC with bilirubin level (r = 0.86) and a significant negative correlation with albumin concentration (r = 0.72) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The dose of everolimus should initially be reduced by half in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the basis of the Child-Pugh classification. Therapeutic monitoring would be a helpful adjunct to subsequent titration of everolimus exposure in this subpopulation. Everolimus has not been assessed in patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Interactions between simvastatin and troglitazone or pioglitazone in healthy subjects.

Two randomized, two-period crossover studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of repeat oral dosing of troglitazone (Study I) and pioglitazone (Study II) on the pharmacokinetics of plasma HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors following multiple oral doses of simvastatin and of simvastatin on the plasma pharmacokinetics of troglitazone (Study I) in healthy subjects. In both studies, each subject received two treatments. Treatment A consisted of once-daily oral doses of troglitazone 400 mg (Study I) or pioglitazone 45 mg (Study II) for 24 days with coadministration of once-daily doses of simvastatin 40 mg (Study I) or 80 mg (Study II) on Days 15 through 24. Treatment B consisted of once-daily oral doses of simvastatin 40 mg (Study I) or 80 mg (Study II) for 10 days. In Study I, the area under the plasma concentration-time profiles (AUC) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in subjects who received both troglitazone and simvastatin were decreased modestly (by approximately 30% for Cmax and approximately 40% for AUC), but time to reach Cmax (tmax) did not change, as compared with those who received simvastatin alone. Simvastatin, administered orally as a 40 mg tablet daily for 10 days, did not affect the AUC or tmax (p > 0.5) but caused a small but clinically insignificant increase (approximately 25%) in Cmax for troglitazone. In Study II, pioglitazone, at the highest approved dose for clinical use, did not significantly alter any of the pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, Cmax, and tmax) of simvastatin HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity. For all treatment regimens, side effects were mild and transient, suggesting that coadministration of simvastatin with either troglitazone or pioglitazone was well tolerated. The modest effect of troglitazone on simvastatin pharmacokinetics is in agreement with the suggestion that troglitazone is an inducer of CYP3A. The insignificant effect of simvastatin on troglitazone pharmacokinetics is consistent with the conclusion that simvastatin is not a significant inhibitor for drug-metabolizing enzymes. The lack of pharmacokinetic effect of pioglitazone on simvastatin supports the expectation that this combination may be used safely.

Effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition on renal function in elderly persons receiving a low-salt diet. A randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), whose inhibition is associated with gastrointestinal ulceration, and COX-2, whose inhibition is associated with therapeutic benefits. Although agents that do not produce COX-1 activity may have fewer adverse effects, targeted disruption of the COX-2 allele in mice has resulted in severe renal problems, suggesting that COX-2 inhibition may also produce adverse effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of rofecoxib, a member of the coxib class of drugs and a specific inhibitor of the COX-2 enzyme, on renal function in elderly patients. DESIGN: A randomized, three-period, single-dose crossover study and a randomized, parallel-group, multiple-dose study. SETTING: Clinical research units. PATIENTS: 75 patients 60 to 80 years of age. INTERVENTION: In the first study, single doses of rofecoxib, 250 mg (about 5-fold to 20-fold the recommended dose); indomethacin, 75 mg; and placebo were administered to 15 patients. In the second study, multiple doses of rofecoxib, 12.5 or 25 mg/d; indomethacin, 50 mg three times daily; or placebo were administered to 60 patients. Patients in both studies received a low-sodium diet MEASUREMENTS: Glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, and urinary and serum sodium and potassium values. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, single doses of rofecoxib and indomethacin decreased the glomerular filtration rate by 0.23 m/s (P < 0.001) and 0.18 mL/s (P = 0.003), respectively. In contrast, respective decreases of 0.14, 0.13, and 0.10 mL/s were observed after multiple doses of rofecoxib, 12.5 mg/d (P = 0.019); rofecoxib, 25 mg (P = 0.029), and indomethacin (P = 0.086) were administered. Changes in creatinine clearance and serum and urinary sodium and potassium were less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of COX-2 inhibition on renal function are similar to those observed with nonselective NSAIDs. Thus, COX-2 seems to play an important role in human renal function.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolmitriptan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Zolmitriptan is a potent selective 5HT1B/1D receptor agonist for acute migraine therapy. Zolmitriptan has vasoconstrictor activity in cerebral vessels and may cause slight elevations of blood pressure in subjects without hypertension. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolmitriptan (5, 10, and 20 mg) were evaluated in 16 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (controlled by hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg once daily) and 17 healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, four-period crossover study. The pharmacokinetics of zolmitriptan and its metabolites were dose proportional. Although area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were slightly higher in patients with hypertension at all doses, this was only statistically significant for AUC at the 20-mg dose. Differences between subjects with and without hypertension were not clinically significant. Zolmitriptan produced a small increase in blood pressure, but this was similar in subjects with and without hypertension and was of no clinical significance. Zolmitriptan was well tolerated in both groups. Zolmitriptan plasma concentrations were higher in women than in men, with higher values of AUC and Cmax and lower total clearance in women. These results indicate that zolmitriptan can be administered for treatment of migraine in patients with controlled hypertension without dose adjustment.