Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pathology ; 48(4): 349-52, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27114373

ABSTRACT

We examined whether introduction of a structured macroscopic reporting template for rectal tumour resection specimens improved the completeness and efficiency in collecting key macroscopic data elements. Fifty free text (narrative) macroscopic reports retrieved from 2012 to 2014 were compared with 50 structured macroscopic reports from 2013 to 2015, all of which were generated at John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW. The six standard macroscopic data elements examined in this study were reported in all 50 anatomical pathology reports using a structured macroscopic reporting dictation template. Free text reports demonstrated significantly impaired data collection when recording intactness of mesorectum (p<0.001), relationship to anterior peritoneal reflection (p=0.028) and distance of tumour to the non-peritonealised circumferential margin (p<0.001). The number of words used was also significantly (p<0.001) reduced using pre-formatted structured reports compared to free text reports. The introduction of a structured reporting dictation template improves data collection and may reduce the subsequent administrative burden when macroscopically evaluating rectal resections.


Subject(s)
Medical Records , Pathology/standards , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy , Humans , Research Report
2.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 14(1): 61-7, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24210724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for the management of symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) recommend upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for transplant-eligible patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using population-based data, we examined the characteristics of transplant-eligible patients who do not undergo upfront ASCT. Altogether, 686 newly diagnosed MM cases were identified through the population-based central cancer registry in Victoria, Australia from 2008 to 2009. We performed a detailed review of clinical notes and follow-up for at least 12 months after diagnosis for a subset of 225 patients who were aged < 70 years at diagnosis and had symptomatic MM. RESULTS: Of these 225 patients, 123 (55%) proceeded to receive upfront ASCT. Patient and disease factors associated with not receiving upfront ASCT were the presence of severe medical comorbidities, MM-associated renal impairment, and initial referral to a medical oncologist rather than a hematologist. Place of residence (rural vs. metropolitan) was not significant. Of 121 patients aged < 65 years at diagnosis who had minor or no comorbidities, only 75 (62%) proceeded to upfront ASCT. CONCLUSION: A substantial percentage of apparently transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed MM do not proceed to upfront ASCT. Community practice appears to diverge from clinical guidelines. The reasons for this divergence require further study but reasons may include perceptions of toxicity vs. benefits of upfront ASCT.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Insurance Coverage/economics , Multiple Myeloma/economics , Multiple Myeloma/surgery , Aged , Australia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Transplantation, Autologous/methods
3.
BJU Int ; 112 Suppl 2: 36-43, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24127675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the contemporary patterns of care for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using a whole of population series from Victoria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of all patients diagnosed and treated for RCC in Victoria in 2009. Patients were identified via the State-wide Victorian Cancer Registry. Patient demographic characteristics, symptoms, stage, and first-line treatment were assessed. Associations between case residential location (metropolitan or rural) and treatment were examined using multivariate logistic regression after adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, treatment in private or public hospital and comorbidity. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 499 of 577 eligible patients. In all, 413 patients (83%) underwent surgery. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN) was the most common procedure for Stage I pT1a/pT1b tumours (51.2%); partial nephrectomy (PN) was performed for 27% of Stage I RCC In multivariate analysis, regional patients were less likely to receive PN (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.85) for Stage I RCC, and less likely to receive systemic therapy for Stage IV RCC (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.41). Multidisciplinary team meetings were recorded for only 25% of patients and 3% were enrolled in a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: Most contemporary patients diagnosed with RCC are still treated with RN, including those with smaller tumours amenable to PN. This may impact future outcomes, including increased risk of chronic kidney disease and its potential financial healthcare burden. Patterns of treatment also appear to differ between metropolitan and regional populations.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Victoria
4.
J Clin Pathol ; 60(11): 1277-83, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17259294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has replaced radioligand binding assay for the determination of oestrogen receptor (ER) status in breast carcinoma. IHC is also used for assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) introduced a breast markers module in 2003 to evaluate the performance of laboratories with IHC for ER, PR and HER2. METHODS: An audit of laboratories reporting breast carcinomas was performed in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate in-house results. Laboratories were asked to submit the hormone receptor and HER2 status on each invasive breast carcinoma for the previous 6 month period up to a maximum of 100 cases. The time periods were 1 July 2004 to 31 December 2004, and 1 July 2005 to 31 December 2005. A total of 55 laboratories returned information for 2004 and 67 for 2005. RESULTS: Complete data on 8128 patients was returned for both surveys, 3353 cases for 2004 and 4775 for 2005. The results were similar for both surveys. Of the 8128 cases, 59.0% were ER+/PR+, 15.9% ER+/PR-, 2.4% ER-/PR+ and 22.7% ER-/PR-. HER2 data were submitted for a total of 6512 patients (excludes 52 patients with incomplete data sets); 17.1% were reported as 3+ positive on IHC, 12.5% as 2+ and 70.4% as negative. CONCLUSIONS: A laboratory audit was introduced into the RCPA QAP for breast markers due to concerns raised by participating laboratories about technical differences in supplied tissues for testing. This audit indicates that overall the results for ER, PR and HER2 fall inside established parameters. However, a number of individual laboratories do not meet the target values and variation in results would impact on patient treatment decisions.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Laboratories/standards , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Steroid/metabolism , Australia , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Medical Audit , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , New Zealand , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...