Effect of alosetron on the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine.

Lotronex (alosetron hydrochloride) is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in females whose predominant bowel habit is diarrhea. Alosetron is extensively metabolized by multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, including CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. Fluoxetine is an antidepressant that is administered as a racemic mixture of equipotent R- and S-enantiomers. Fluoxetine metabolism involves CYP2D6 and CYP2C9 in the formation of its major metabolite, norfluoxetine. This metabolite is also present as two enantiomers, of which only the S-enantiomer exhibits comparable antidepressant activity. This study was conducted to assess the potential for an effect of alosetron on the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine. This was an open-label, two-period, nonrandomized, crossover study in 12 healthy female and male volunteers. The pharmacokinetics for both enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were examined following single oral doses of 20 mg fluoxetine, given alone and in combination with alosetron 1 mg twice daily for 15 days. The results showed small delays in peak concentration but no clinically significant effect of alosetron on the pharmacokinetics of S- and R-fluoxetine or S- and R-norfluoxetine. Coadministration of alosetron and fluoxetine was well tolerated by all subjects.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous dolasetron in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147, Anzemet, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Kansas City, MO) is a 5-HT ( 3 ) receptor antagonist undergoing clinical evaluation as an antiemetic agent. Dolasetron is rapidly metabolized to form hydrodolasetron (MDL 74,156). The pharmacokinetics of hydrodolasetron were studied after administration of a single intravenous infusion of 0.6 mg/kg (group I) or 1.8 mg/kg (group II) in 21 cancer patients participating in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial of the drug in patients receiving their first course of high-dose (>/=75 mg/m ( 2 ) ) cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The intent of this study was to obtain preliminary data on the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite, hydrodolasetron, in cancer patients. The reduced metabolite, hydrodolasetron, was formed rapidly with peak plasma concentrations (group I, mean = 128.6 ng/mL; group II, mean = 505.3 ng/mL) occurring at or shortly after the end of the infusion. Plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron remained quantifiable for up to 24 hours. Increases in peak plasma concentrations and AUC of hydrodolasetron were proportional to dose, suggesting linear pharmacokinetics over this dose range. Apparent clearance, apparent volume of distribution, elimination rate, and terminal elimination half-life of the reduced metabolite were similar at both doses. The results support a pharmacokinetic basis for the prolonged duration of antiemetic efficacy after a single intravenous dose.

Intravenous pharmacokinetics and absolute oral bioavailability of dolasetron in healthy volunteers: part 1.

In this first part of a two-part investigation, the intravenous dose proportionality of dolasetron mesylate, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and the absolute bioavailability of oral dolasetron mesylate were investigated. In an open-label, randomized, four-way crossover design, 24 healthy men between the ages of 19 and 45 years received the following doses: 50, 100, or 200 mg dolasetron mesylate administered by 10-min intravenous infusion or 200 mg dolasetron mesylate solution administered orally. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 h after dosing. Following intravenous administration, dolasetron was rapidly eliminated from plasma, with a mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of less than 10 min. Dolasetron was rarely detected in plasma after oral administration of the 200 mg dose. Hydrodolasetron, the active primary metabolite of dolasetron, appeared rapidly in plasma following both oral and intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate, with a mean time to maximum concentration (t(max)) of less than 1 h. The mean t1/2 of hydrodolasetron ranged from 6.6-8.8 h. The plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity)) for both dolasetron and hydrodolasetron increased proportionally with dose over the intravenous dose range of 50-200 mg dolasetron mesylate. Approximately 29-33%) and 22% of the dose was excreted in urine as hydrodolasetron following intravenous and oral administration of dolasetron, respectively. For dolasetron as well as hydrodolasetron, mean systemic clearance (C1), volume of distribution (Vd), and t1/2 were similar at each dolasetron dose. The mean 'apparent' bioavailability of dolasetron calculated using plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron was 76%. The R(+) enantiomer of hydrodolasetron represented the majority of drug in plasma (> 75%) and urine (> 86%). Dolasetron was well tolerated following both oral and intravenous administration.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of oral dolasetron and its active metabolites in healthy volunteers: part 2.

The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and dose-proportionality of oral dolasetron and its active metabolites over the therapeutic dose range was investigated in 18 healthy men. In an open-label, randomized, complete three-way crossover design, each subject received three separate doses: 50, 100, and 200 mg doses of dolasetron mesylate solution given orally. Each dose was administered on the morning of Days 1 and 3-7 during each of the three treatment periods. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for 48 h after the first and last doses. Blood was analysed for dolasetron and hydrodolasetron concentrations; urine was analysed for dolasetron, the R(+) and S(-)-enantiomers of hydrodolasetron, and the 5'-hydroxy and 6'-hydroxy metabolites of hydrodolasetron. Dolasetron was rarely detected in plasma. Hydrodolasetron was formed rapidly, with a time to maximum concentration (t(max)) of less than 1 h. Steady-state conditions for hydrodolasetron were reached 2-3 days after starting once-daily dosing. Although statistical significance was found for hydrodolasetron AUC(0->infinity) and C(max) between dose groups after both single and multiple doses of dolasetron, the differences were small and unlikely to be of clinical significance. About 17-22% of the dose was excreted in urine as hydrodolasetron, with the majority (> 83%) as the R(+) enantiomer.

Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron with coadministration of cimetidine or rifampin in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Dolasetron is a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cimetidine and rifampin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of orally administered dolasetron and its active reduced metabolite, hydrodolasetron. METHODS: A group of 18 healthy men (22 to 44 years old) were randomized to receive each of the following three treatments in a three-period cross-over design: 200 mg dolasetron daily (treatment A); 200 mg dolasetron daily plus 300 mg cimetidine four times daily (treatment B); or 200 mg dolasetron daily plus 600 mg rifampin daily (treatment C). Each study period was separated by a 14-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected before the first dose (baseline) on day 1 and at frequent intervals up to 48 h after the morning dose on day 7 for quantification of dolasetron and its metabolites, hydrodolasetron (both isomers), 5'OH hydrodolasetron, and 6'OH hydrodolasetron. Serial urine samples were also collected at baseline and during the periods 0-24 and 24-48 h following the morning dose on day 7, and analyzed for dolasetron and its metabolites. RESULTS: Plasma and urine dolasetron concentrations were below quantifiable concentrations for all three treatments. Mean steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCss(0-24)) of hydrodolasetron increased by 24%, mean apparent clearance (CLapp.po) decreased by 19%, and maximum plasma hydrodolasetron concentration (Cmax,ss) increased by 15% when dolasetron was coadministered with cimetidine. When dolasetron was given with rifampin, mean hydrodolasetron AUCss(0-24) decreased by 28%, CLapp.po, increased by 39%, and hydrodolasetron Cmax,ss decreased by 17%. Small differences were found in mean tmax (0.7 to 0.8 h), CLr (2.0 to 2.6 ml/min per kg), and t1/2 (7.4 to 8.8 h) for hydrodolasetron between treatment periods. Approximately 20% and 2% of the dolasetron dose were excreted in urine as the R(+) isomer and S(-) isomer of hydrodolasetron, respectively, across all three treatments. Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated in this study during all three treatment periods, with the highest incidence of adverse events reported during the control period when dolasetron mesylate was given alone. CONCLUSION: Based on the small changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of dolasetron and its active metabolites, as well as the favorable safety results, no dosage adjustments for dolasetron mesylate are recommended with concomitant administration of cimetidine or rifampin.

Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous dolasetron mesylate in patients with renal impairment.

In an open-label, randomized, two-way complete crossover study, the influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and its primary active metabolite, hydrodolasetron, were evaluated. Patients with renal impairment were stratified into three groups of 12 based on their 24-hour creatinine clearance (Cl(cr)): group 1, mild impairment (Cl(cr) between 41 and 80 mL/min); group 2, moderate impairment (Cl(cr) between 11 and 40 mL/min); and group 3, endstage renal impairment (Cl(cr) < or = 10 mL/min). Twenty-four healthy volunteers from a previous study served as the control group. Each participant received a single intravenous or oral 200-mg dose of dolasetron mesylate on separate occasions. Serial blood samples were collected up to 60 hours after dose for determination of dolasetron and hydrodolasetron, and urine samples were collected in intervals up to 72 hours for determination of dolasetron, hydrodolasetron, and the 5' and 6'-hydroxy metabolites of hydrodolasetron. Because plasma concentrations were low and sporadic, pharmacokinetic parameters of dolasetron were not calculated after oral administration. Although some significant differences in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity), volume of distribution (Vd), systemic clearance (Cl), and elimination half-life (t1/2) of the parent drug were observed between control subjects and patients with renal impairment, there were no systematic findings related to degree of renal dysfunction. The elimination pathways of hydrodolasetron include both hepatic metabolism and renal excretion. Consistent increases in mean Cmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 and decreases in renal and total apparent clearance of hydrodolasetron were seen with diminishing renal function after intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate. No consistent changes were found after oral administration. Urinary excretion of hydrodolasetron and its metabolites decreased with decreasing renal function, but the profile of metabolites remained constant. Dolasetron was well tolerated in all three groups of patients. Based on these findings, no dosage adjustment for dolasetron is recommended in patients with renal impairment.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide administered alone and in combination.

Diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide are widely used to treat cardiovascular disease, often in combination. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a drug-drug pharmacokinetic interaction exists between diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide. In a randomized, crossover, open study, multiple doses of diltiazem (60 mg four times daily for 21 doses) and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg twice daily for 11 doses) were administered alone and in combination on three separate occasions to 20 healthy male volunteers. Trough and serial blood samples were collected and plasma was assayed for diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, and diltiazem metabolites (desacetyldiltiazem and N-desmethyldiltiazem) using HPLC. Total urine was also collected and quantified for hydrochlorothiazide. Coadministered hydrochlorothiazide did not significantly (p > 0.05) alter diltiazem (alone versus combination) steady-state maximum plasma concentration (Css(max); 145 versus 158 ng mL(-1), respectively), time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max); 3.0 versus 2.8 h, respectively); area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCss; 688 versus 771 ng x h mL(-1)), oral clearance (Cl(oral); 96.2 versus 88.0 L h(-1)), or elimination half-life (t(1/2); 5.2 versus 5.2 h). Similarly, administration of diltiazem did not significantly (p > 0.05) influence hydrochlorothiazide (alone versus combination) Css(max) (221 versus 288 ng mL(-1)), t(max) (1.8 versus 2.0 h), AUCss (1194 versus 1247 ng x h mL(-1)), Cl(oral) (22.4 versus 21.2 L h(-1)); t(1/2) (9.8 versus 9.6 h), or renal Cl (15.5 versus 15.2 L h(-1)). In conclusion, a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide does not exist.

Effect of infusion rate on the pharmacokinetics and tolerance of intravenous dolasetron mesylate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of dolasetron mesylate and its active metabolite hydrodolasetron when dolasetron mesylate was administered intravenously at increasing infusion rates. DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. METHODS: Forty-nine healthy nonsmoking male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive intravenous doses of dolasetron mesylate 100 mg or placebo. Three groups of 16 subjects each (12 dolasetron mesylate, 4 placebo) received escalating infusion rates (50, 100, then 200 mg/min). Physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and adverse events were recorded before and after administration of the study drug. Serial blood samples and 12-lead electrocardiogram measurements were obtained for 24 hours after the infusion. Plasma samples were analyzed for dolasetron and hydrodolasetron. RESULTS: Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated, with no apparent differences in vital signs or adverse event profiles among the different rates of infusion. In general, the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and hydrodolasetron were superimposable among the three infusion rate groups. Plasma dolasetron concentrations declined rapidly in all three infusion rate groups, with mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of less than 10 minutes. The reduced metabolite hydrodolasetron, which accounts for most pharmacologic activity, formed rapidly, with maximum concentrations occurring between 0.4 and 0.5 hours and disappeared with a mean t1/2 of 8-9 hours. The correlation coefficients of least-squares regression analysis between the pharmacokinetic parameters and the infusion rate of dolasetron were less than 0.083 and the slopes were not significantly different from 0, suggesting that none of the hydrodolasetron pharmacokinetic parameters were affected by rate of infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The intravenous administration of dolasetron 100 mg over 0.5-2 minutes did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic profiles of either dolasetron or hydrodolasetron. In addition, the safety profile of dolasetron did not change with increasing rate of infusion. Therefore, the rate of infusion of dolasetron mesylate appears to have no pharmacokinetic or clinical implications when assessed over a 0.5-2-minute time period.

Relative bioavailability of Cardizem CD and Tiazac controlled-release diltiazem dosage forms after single and multiple dosing in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of Cardizem CD compared to Tiazac after single and multiple doses. Twenty-three healthy males were enrolled in this open-label, two-way, complete crossover investigation. During each of the two treatment periods, a single 240-mg dose of diltiazem HCl was given in the morning on study day 1, then once daily on days 3 through 9. Serial plasma samples were obtained and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the single-dose and steady-state concentration-time profiles. After single doses, mean diltiazem maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) was 46% higher with the Tiazac formulation compared with Cardizem CD, and the mean area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) was 19% higher with Tiazac. At steady-state, similar Cmax and AUC for the 24-hour dosing interval were found for Cardizem CD and Tiazac. However, Tiazac produced a 21% lower diltiazem minimum plasma concentration, a 28% lower trough concentration (the concentration in the plasma sample obtained just before the daily dose was given), and a 1.5-times higher fluctuation in maximum to minimum diltiazem plasma concentration compared with Cardizem CD. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the two pharmacologically active diltiazem metabolites, desacetyldiltiazem and N-desmethyldiltiazem, followed that of parent drug after single and multiple doses of Cardizem CD and Tiazac. From these results, it is concluded that the pharmacokinetic profiles of Tiazac and Cardizem CD are significantly different.

Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron after oral and intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic dysfunction.

In previous studies, dolasetron was shown to have both renal and hepatic elimination mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the impact of varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics and safety of dolasetron and its reduced metabolites. Seventeen adults were studied: six healthy volunteers (group I), seven patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A; group II), and four patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B or C1; group III). Single 150-mg doses of dolasetron mesylate were administered intravenously and orally, with a 7-day washout period separating treatments. After intravenous administration, no differences were observed between healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), or elimination half-life (t1/2) of intact dolasetron. No significant differences were found in Cmax, AUC, or apparent clearance (C(lapp)) of hydrodolasetron, the primary metabolite of dolasetron. The mean t1/2 increased from 6.87 hours in group I to 11.69 hours in group III. After oral administration, C(lapp) of hydrodolasetron decreased by 42%, and Cmax increased by 18% in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were less changes in patients with mildly hepatic impairment. Total percentage of dose excreted as metabolites was similar for healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment, although urinary metabolite profiles differed slightly. Dolasetron was well tolerated and there were no apparent differences in adverse effects between groups or treatments. Because hepatic impairment did not influence Cl(app) of hydrodolasetron after intravenous administration, and the range of plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron after oral administration was not different from those observed in healthy volunteers, dosage adjustments are not recommended for patients with hepatic disease and normal renal function.

Indigenous human cutaneous anthrax in Texas.

In December 1988 an indigenous case of cutaneous anthrax was identified in Texas. The patient, a 63-year-old male Hispanic from southwest Texas, was a sheep shearer and had a recent history of dissecting sheep that had died suddenly. He experienced an illness characterized by left arm pain and edema. A necrotic lesion developed on his left forearm, with cellulitis and lymphadenopathy. After treatment with oral and intravenous penicillins, the patient fully recovered. Western blot testing revealed a fourfold or greater rise in antibody titer to Bacillus anthracis protective antigen and lethal factor. This represents the first case of indigenous anthrax in Texas in more than 20 years.

Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem and propranolol when administered alone and in combination.

Multiple oral doses of diltiazem (DTZ) and propranolol (PPL, 60 mg every 8 h daily for 13 doses) were administered to 14 healthy volunteers alone and in combination on three separate occasions. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 h after dose 13 on day 5 to determine possible pharmacokinetic interactions between the two drugs. When administered alone, DTZ concentration peaked at 161.4 ng ml-1 3 h following the final dose with an elimination half-life of 6.1 h. DTZ oral clearance was 65.1 l h-1. PPL did not affect DTZ oral clearance and half-life during the combination treatment. However, DTZ tmax was extended from 2.9 h to 3.5 h (p less than 0.05) and Cmax was 144.7 ng ml-1. Unlike the parent drug DTZ, desacetyldiltiazem (DAD) plasma profile was elevated during the combination treatment. DAD Cmax and AUC both increased approximately 20 per cent (p less than 0.05). PPL pharmacokinetics were altered as well. Oral clearance of PPL decreased from 80.4 l h-1 to 61.0 l h-1 while the half-life increased from 5.9 h to 8.0 h (p less than 0.05). PPL Cmax increased from 155.1 ng ml-1 to 167.5 ng ml-1.

The influence of sucralfate on ibuprofen absorption in healthy adult males.

Sucralfate (Carafate) is a new anti-ulcer agent the effects of which are mediated locally in the gastrointestinal tract. The use of this compound in conjunction with ulcerogenic drugs such as ibuprofen may represent a means of reducing gastrointestinal irritation. Combined oral therapy, however, requires evaluation of a potential interaction in absorption between those agents. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of sucralfate coingestion on ibuprofen absorption. Twelve normal, healthy male subjects ingested a single oral 400 mg dose of ibuprofen alone or with sucralfate given as 1 g doses four times a day for 2 days prior to and during the study. Ibuprofen serum concentrations were measured for 12 hours following dosing. Parameters associated with rate of absorption (i.e. Cmax, tmax, Ka) were significantly altered in the presence of sucralfate (p less than 0.05). In contrast, the relative bioavailability of ibuprofen was not significantly different between treatments (p greater than 0.05). Therefore, sucralfate does not alter the extent of ibuprofen absorption and would not be expected to change the response to that anti-inflammatory agent.

Pharmacokinetics of dothiepin in humans: a single dose dose-proportionality study.

Dothiepin hydrochloride (N,N-dimethyldibenzo[b,e]thiepin-delta 11(6 H), gamma-propylamine hydrochloride) is a tricyclic antidepressant which is structurally similar to amitriptyline. Twenty-seven healthy men received three single oral doses of 50-, 100-, and 150-mg dothiepin hydrochloride capsules in a three-way randomized, crossover dose-proportionality study. Plasma concentration-time profiles of dothiepin (1) were described by both one- and two-compartment models with first-order absorption. The total intrinsic clearance of dothiepin decreased from 165.5 to 121.1 L/h as the dose was increased from 50 to 150 mg, but there was no significant effect on the terminal half-life (approximately 20 h). Plasma concentration-time profiles of the three major metabolites of dothiepin, the S-oxide derivative of dothiepin, N,N-dimethyl[b,e]thiepin-delta 11(6 H), gamma-propylamine 5-oxide (2), the demethyl derivative, N-methyldibenzo[b,e]thiepin-delta 11(6 H), gamma-propylamine (3) and the demethyl S-oxide derivative N-methyldibenzo[b,e]thiepin-delta 11(6 H), gamma-propylamine 5-oxide (4), were described by a one-compartment model with apparent first-order formation. The AUC infinity values of the S-oxide 2 and the demethyl S-oxide 4 increased proportionally with dose. The dose proportionality of the demethyl metabolite 3 may not be ascertained from the data in this study. The corresponding half-lives of the three metabolites, which are dose independent, were approximately 24, 28, and 40 h, respectively.

Quantitation of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in dog plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure was developed for the determination of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem in dog plasma. Two milliliters of plasma is extracted with a hexane-2-propanol mixture. The assay uses a reverse-phase column maintained at 55 degrees C with a silica saturation column and a pellicular precolumn. The mobile phase is acetonitrile-water (50:50) at pH 6.6 with 1.5-g/L heptanesulfonic acid added as the ion-pair reagent. The procedure is sensitive to 5 ng/mL for both compounds in dog plasma and is linear up to 2000 ng/mL for diltiazem and 1000 ng/mL for desacetyldiltiazem . Preliminary dog mean plasma profiles of diltiazem and desacetyldiltiazem are presented.

Relationship between plasma diltiazem and cardiovascular responses in conscious dogs.

Conscious dogs were given diltiazem hydrochloride (DTZ) orally for 5 successive days at doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg/day. During the 5th day, cardiovascular responses were monitored at various timed intervals after dosing. Arterial blood was sampled concomitantly for drug analysis. DTZ produced a dose-related decrease in blood pressure. The maximum reduction amounted to -30/-33 mm Hg in systolic/diastolic pressure, which occurred 90-150 min after the dose of 10 mg/kg. Heart rate and respiration were not significantly changed. There were dose-related alterations in the electrocardiogram tracing components, ranging from PR interval prolongation to junctional rhythms and ectopic beats. No overt physical responses were apparent. The mean DTZ peak plasma levels were approximately 708 ng/ml after 10 mg/kg, 224 ng/ml after 3 mg/kg, and 98 ng/ml after 1 mg/kg. The estimated t1/2 values for the 3- and 10-mg/kg/day dosings were 142 and 150 min, respectively. Correlations between the DTZ plasma level and the magnitude of the cardiovascular responses were highly significant in terms of blood pressure and PR interval changes. Low levels of DTZ were found 23 h after dosing. These levels were not associated with any meaningful cardiovascular activity.