Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 139: 272-278, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004790

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vascular prostheses for small caliber bypass grafts in cardiac and vascular diseases or for access surgery are still missing. Poly (Ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) has been previously investigated by our group and showed good biocompatibility and mechanical properties in vitro and rapid endothelialisation, cellular infiltration and vascularisation in vivo yielding optimal patency in the abdominal aortic position. The aim of the present study is to evaluate our PCL graft in the carotid position and to compare its outcome to the grafts implanted in the abdominal aortic position. METHODS: PCL grafts (1 mm ID/10 mm long) were implanted into the left common carotid artery in 20 Sprague-Dawley rats and compared to our previously published series of abdominal aortic implants. The animals were followed up to 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. At each time point, in vivo compliance, angiography and histological examination with morphology were performed. RESULTS: PCL grafts showed good mechanical properties and ease of handling. The average graft compliance was 14.5 ±â€¯1.7%/ mmHg compared to 7.8 ±â€¯0.9% for the abdominal position and 45.1 ±â€¯3.2%/ mmHg for the native carotid artery. The overall patency for the carotid position was 65% as compared to 100% in the abdominal position. Complete endothelialisation was achieved at 3 weeks and cell invasion was more rapid than in the aortic position. In contrast, intimal hyperplasia (IH) and vascular density were less pronounced than in the aortic position. CONCLUSION: Our PCL grafts in the carotid position were well endothelialised with early cellular infiltration, higher compliance, lower IH and calcification compared to the similar grafts implanted in the aortic position. However, there was a higher occlusion rate compared to our abdominal aorta series. Anatomical position, compliance mismatch, flow conditions may answer the difference in patency seen.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Carotid Arteries/surgery , Animals , Aorta, Abdominal/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Caproates/chemistry , Carotid Arteries/physiopathology , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/diagnostic imaging , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/physiopathology , Lactones/chemistry , Models, Animal , Polyesters/chemistry , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Vascular Patency
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...