Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A cross-sectional survey among physicians in Europe.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented following the 2014 referral for valproate in Europe. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey was conducted over 2-month period in 2016 among physicians who prescribed valproate in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain and Sweden. The web-based questionnaire included five endpoints to evaluate physicians' knowledge on (a) prescribing valproate only for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women if other treatments were ineffective or not tolerated; (b) ensuring supervision by experienced physicians while treating these conditions; (c) considering alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy, regular review of treatment needs and re-assessing the benefit-risk balance in women and girls reaching puberty; (d) informing patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and (e) advising women on effective contraception during their treatment. RESULTS: Among 1153 physicians, 95.5% responded prescribing valproate for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women only if other treatments are ineffective/not tolerated; 66.5% supervised while treatment; 76.6% considered alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy; 92.1% informed patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and 94.4% advised patients on the use of effective contraception during its treatment. Overall, 25.8% physicians recalled receiving both educational material (EM) and Dear Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC). All endpoint rates were higher for physicians who acknowledged receipt of both DHPC and EM compared to physicians who did not receive them. CONCLUSIONS: Although results varied across geography and physician speciality, majority of physicians had good knowledge about the indication and safety aspects of prescribing and using valproate.

Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A drug utilisation study in Europe.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented in Europe in 2014 for valproate-containing products to mitigate their risk during pregnancy and to characterise valproate prescribing patterns in women of childbearing potential (WCBP) before and after implementation of RMMs. METHODS: A multinational cohort study based on existing data sources using a pre-/post- design was performed in five European countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, UK) in an outpatient setting. Effectiveness of RMMs was assessed by comparing the proportion of valproate initiations as second (or subsequent) line therapy before and after implementation of RMMs (primary outcome) with an increase in this proportion indicating success of RMMs. Overall use of valproate and incidence of pregnancies in WCBP were also examined. RESULTS: The proportion of valproate initiations as second line therapy increased after implementation of RMMs in incident female users in Sweden (from 81.1%, 95% CI 79.9%-82.3% to 84.5%, 95% CI 83.5%-85.5%) and the UK (from 66.4%, 95% CI 64.5%-68.3% to 72.4%, 95% CI 70.0%-74.9%), it remained the same in Germany and Spain and decreased in France from 48.7% (95% CI 45.6%-51.9%) to 40.6% (95% CI 37.6%-43.7%). In Sweden and the UK, the incidence of pregnancies exposed to valproate decreased in the post-implementation period: 8.0 vs 9.5 and 10.9 vs 16.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results on primary outcome of this study suggest limited effectiveness of the RMMs. Additional RMMs were implemented in 2018.