A representative assessment of the management of open fractures of the lower limb within UK orthoplastic centres: A two-centre audit of compliance with national standards.

BACKGROUND: Open fractures of the lower limb represent a complex and varied array of injuries. The BOAST 4 document produced by BAPRAS and the BOA provides standards on how to manage these patients, and NICE have recently produced additional guidance. We aimed to assess concordance with these standards in a large cohort representative of UK orthoplastic centres. METHODS: Patients admitted to the orthoplastic units at Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital and Royal Stoke University Hospital with open lower limb fractures between 2009 and 2014 were included. Data was gathered from notes and endpoints based on the BOAST 4 document. RESULTS: In total, 84 patients were included across the two sites, with 83 having their initial debridement within 24h (98.8%). Forty-two patients had a documented out-of-hours initial surgery. Of these, 10 (23.8%) had an indication for urgent surgery. This pattern was consistent across both hospitals. A plastic surgeon was present at 33.3% of initial operations. Of 78 patients receiving definitive soft tissue cover, 56.4% had cover within 72h and 78.2% within 7days. Main reasons for missing these targets were transfer from other hospitals, plastic surgeons not present at initial operation and intervening critical illness. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified key areas for improving compliance with the national BOAST 4 and NICE standards. Out-of-hours operating is occurring unnecessarily and time targets are being missed. The development of dedicated referral pathways and a true orthoplastic approach are required to improve the management of this complex set of injuries.

Evaluation of patients' attitudes to their care during oral and maxillofacial surgical outpatient consultations: the importance of waiting times and quality of interaction between patient and doctor.

Knowing what patients think about their care is fundamental to the provision of an effective, quality service, and it can help to direct change and reduce costs. Much of the work in oral and maxillofacial departments concerns the treatment of outpatients, but as little is known about what they think about their care, we aimed to find out which aspects were associated with satisfaction. Consecutive patients (n=244) who attended the oral and maxillofacial outpatient department at Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust over a 7-day period were given a questionnaire to complete before and after their consultation. It included questions with Likert scale responses on environmental, procedural, and interactive aspects of the visit, and a 16-point scale to rank their priorities. A total of 187 patients (77%) completed the questionnaires. No association was found between expected (p=0.93) or actual (p=0.41) waiting times, and 90% of patients were satisfied with their visit. Seeing the doctor, having confidence in the treatment plan, being listened to, and the ability of the doctor to recognise their personal needs, were ranked as important. Environmental and procedural aspects were considered the least important. These findings may be of value in the development of services to improve patient-centred care.

Laparoscopic radical 'no-touch' left pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: technique and results.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy has been well described for benign pancreatic lesions, but its role in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains open to debate. We report our results adopting a laparoscopic technique that obeys established oncologic principles of open distal pancreatosplenectomy. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospectively kept database of 135 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic left pancreatectomy, performed across two sites in the UK and the Netherlands (07/2007-07/2015 Southampton and 10/2013-07/2015 Amsterdam). Primary outcomes were resection margin and lymph node retrieval. Secondary endpoints were other perioperative outcomes, including post-operative pancreatic fistula. Definition of radical resection was distance tumour to resection margin >1 mm. All patients underwent 'laparoscopic radical left pancreatosplenectomy' (LRLP) which involves 'hanging' the pancreas including Gerota's fascia, followed by clockwise dissection, including formal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: LRLP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was performed in 25 patients. Seven of the 25 patients (28 %) had extended resections, including the adrenal gland (n = 3), duodenojejunal flexure (n = 2) or transverse mesocolon (n = 3). Mean age was 68 years (54-81). Conversion rate was 0 %, mean operative time 240 min and mean blood loss 340 ml. Median intensive/high care and hospital stay were 1 and 5 days, respectively. Clavien-Dindo score 3+ complication rate was 12 % and ISGPF grade B/C pancreatic fistula rate 28 %; 90-day (or in-hospital) mortality was 0 %. The pancreatic resection margin was clear in all patients, and the posterior margin was involved (<1 mm) in 6 patients, meaning an overall R0 resection rate of 76 %. No resection margin was microscopically involved. Median nodal sample was 15 nodes (3-26). With an average follow-up of 17.2 months, 1-year survival was 88 %. CONCLUSIONS: A standardised laparoscopic approach to pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the left pancreas can be adopted safely. Our study shows that these results can be reproduced across multiple sites using the same technique.

Microsurgical Reconstructions for Head and Neck Cancers in Elderly Aged >80 Years: An Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of primary head and neck (H&N) cancers in the elderly presents a dilemma regarding the appropriateness of complex surgery in this assumed frail age group. With limited data on surgical morbidity, survival, and patient quality of life (QOL), this analysis aimed to broaden the understanding of safety and effectiveness of microsurgical treatment in very elderly H&N cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective database analysis was used to evaluate surgical outcomes (morbidity, survival, and QOL) in all patients aged 80 years and older undergoing microsurgical reconstruction for cutaneous and intra-oral H&N cancers between 2004 and 2014. Outcomes were assessed for their association with surgical, tumour, and patient variables. Comorbidities were categorized by the ACE27 index and postoperative morbidity by the Clavien-Dindo scoring system. QOL was analyzed using the UW-QOLv4. RESULTS: Of 720 microsurgical reconstructions, 96 patients were identified. Median survival was 25 months. The ACE27 index was the only variable significantly associated with survival with a 5-year survival of 59.2 % in the least comorbid group versus 19.7 % in the most comorbid group (p 0.015). ACE-27 showed influence on socioemotional QoL scores. Physical QOL scores were influenced by tumour and operative factors. Patients were found to value physical QOL over socioemotional. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical reconstructions are well tolerated in the very elderly patients and should be considered predominantly based on comorbidity. Tumour stage, flap type, and cancer site should still form part of the preoperative counseling due to their implication on postoperative physical function.