Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult ; 23(3): 155-61, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26507316

ABSTRACT

The present study describes a novel Forced-Choice Response (FCR) index for detecting poor effort on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). This retrospective study analyzes the performance of 4 groups on the new index: clinically referred patients with suspected dementia, forensic patients identified as not exhibiting adequate effort on other measures of response bias, students who simulated poor effort, and a large normative sample collected in the Gulf State of Oman. Using sensitivity and specificity analyses, the study shows that much like the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition FCR index, the RAVLT FCR index misses a proportion of individuals with inadequate effort (low sensitivity), but those who fail this measure are highly likely to be exhibiting poor effort (high specificity). The limitations and benefits of utilizing the RAVLT FCR index in clinical practice are discussed.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior/physiology , Dementia/complications , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Learning Disabilities/etiology , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Verbal Learning/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Forensic Psychiatry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies
2.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 30(7): 710-9, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25335125

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In spite of growing numbers of older people, there are few treatment studies on late-life bipolar disorder (BD). This was a 12-week prospective, open-label trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of adjunct asenapine in non-demented older adults (≥ 60 years) with sub-optimal previous response to BD treatments. METHODS: Asenapine was initiated at 5 mg/day and titrated as tolerated. Effects on global psychopathology were measured with Clinical Global Impression, bipolar version (CGI-BP), and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Mood polarity severity was measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Young Mania Rating Scale. Other outcomes included the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. RESULTS: Fifteen individuals were enrolled (mean age 68.6, SD 6.12; 53% female; 73% Caucasian, 13% African American, and 7% Asian). There were 4/15 (27%) individuals who prematurely terminated the study, whereas 11/15 (73%) completed the study. There were significant improvements from baseline on the BPRS (p < 0.05), on CGI-BP overall (p < 0.01), and on CGI-BP mania (p < 0.05) and depression (p < 0.01) subscales. The mean dose of asenapine was 11.2 (SD 6.2) mg/day. The most common reported side effects were gastrointestinal discomfort (n = 5, 33%), restlessness (n = 2, 13%), tremors (n = 2, 13%), cognitive difficulties (n = 2, 13%), and sluggishness (n = 2, 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Older people with BD had global improvements on asenapine. Most reported adverse effects were mild and transient, but adverse effects prompted drug discontinuation in just over one quarter of patients. Although risks versus benefits in older people must always be carefully considered, asenapine may be a treatment consideration for some non-demented geriatric BD patients.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Dibenzocycloheptenes , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
3.
Psychiatr Danub ; 26 Suppl 1: 78-84, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25413518

ABSTRACT

The elderly are the fastest growing segment of the global population with the number of people age 60 or older having doubled since 1980 and the number of people age 80 or older expected to increase more than 4-fold (to 395 million) by the year 2050. While depression is overall less common in older people compared to younger people, there are sub-groups of elderly, such as those with significant medical comorbidity, who are at greatly elevated risk for depression. Negative consequences of late-life depression include functional decline and disability, increased use of non-mental health services, increased mortality rates due to cardiovascular causes, increased cancer rates, and substantially greater risk for suicide. Geriatric suicide is a global epidemic, which is worsened in many countries and cultures by socioeconomic disparities and cultural/social upheaval. Geriatric depression should be carefully assessed and treated. Treatments for geriatric depression include biological modalities such as antidepressant medications and Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as well as psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions. When they are prescribed pharmacotherapies for depression, older adults are especially likely to experience adverse drug effects as a result of their multiple chronic diseases, use of multiple concomitant medications, and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes that accompany aging. Antidepressants that minimize side effects are generally preferred in elderly individuals although the expected therapeutic response to drug treatment is generally modest. Psychosocial and psychotherapeutic measures can also be effective in late-life depression. Complexities of assessment and treatment include the risk of missing a bipolar depressive diagnosis, which would contra-indicate the use of antidepressant monotherapy. Given the projected increased proportions and overall numbers of older people with mental disorders there is a need for all clinicians to be familiar with mental health issues in elderly patients.

4.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 8: 487-91, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24790416

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Psychotropic-related weight gain is a common concern among patients with bipolar disorder (BD). This concern affects satisfaction with treatment and may lead to non-adherence and relapse. This was a 12-week, uncontrolled prospective trial of patient-choice-facilitated ziprasidone switching among non-adherent BD patients with weight concerns. This study was conducted from January 2011 to July 2012. METHOD: Patients were asked to identify the "offending" BD medication which they believed was causing weight problems, and this agent was replaced with ziprasidone. The primary outcome was change in adherence as measured with the Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ). Secondary outcomes included medication attitudes, BD symptoms, global psychopathology, social functioning, and quality of life. RESULTS: The most common agents causing weight concerns were quetiapine (N=7, 23%), aripiprazole (N=4, 13%), olanzapine, lithium, and divalproex (all N=3, 10%). Adherence improved from a baseline of missing 48.6% of prescribed BD medication in the past week (44.9% in the past month) to missing 25.3% (P=0.002) of prescribed BD medication in the past week (P<0.001, in the past month) at endpoint. Medication attitudes, symptoms, functioning, and quality of life improved but there were no differences in body weight. CONCLUSION: While findings must be tempered by methodological limitations such as small sample and uncontrolled design, patient-facilitated medication-switching appeared to improve adherence and BD outcomes in these non-adherent individuals. Additional studies involving patient-facilitated medication-switching and shared decision-making in BD are needed.

5.
Cut Edge Psychiatry Pract ; 2013(1): 332-338, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24358446

ABSTRACT

Aims To identify clinical factors associated with disability in depressed older adults with bipolar disorder (BPD) receiving lamotrigine. Methods Secondary analysis of a multi-site, 12-week, open-label, uncontrolled study of addon lamotrigine in 57 adults 60 years and older with BD I or II depression. Measures included the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), and WHO-Disability Assessment Scale II (WHO-DAS II). Results Medical comorbidiy in this group of elders was substantial, with roughly 60% of subjects having disorders of the vascular, musculoskeletal/integument, and endodrine/metabolic/breast systems. We found significant relationships among mood (MADRS), medical comorbidity (CIRS-G), cognition (DRS), and disability (WHO-DAS II). More severe BPD depression, more medical comorbidity and more impaired cognition were all associated with lower functioning in BPD elders. Conclusions Our findings fit the paradigm shift that has been occurring in BPD, supporting the notion that BPD is not solely an illness of mood but that it affects multiple domains impacting overall functioning.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...