Development of a body dysmorphic disorder screener for DSM-5 (BDDS-5).

Early identification of individuals with Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is essential to direct them to appropriate care and to reduce the chance of developing or maintaining comorbid psychiatric disorders (like an eating disorder (ED)). The present study aimed to develop a simple screener, the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Screener for DSM-5 (BDDS-5), to overcome existing screeners' limitations and test its psychometric properties. The BDDS-5 consists of 12 statements with dichotomous answer options. Specific attention is paid to the readability of the screener for those with lower reading skills. Additional eating disorder screening questions (S section) were added to investigate whether these questions are necessary for detecting potential BDD cases. Finally, the factor structure, internal consistency, and validity of the BDDS-5 were examined within populations with a high risk of screening positive for BDD or ED. Principal axis factor analysis showed that two factors accounted for 63.5% of the variance. The factor analysis was based on polychoric correlation. Based on the BDDS-5, 33 persons (14% of N = 235) were screened as likely BDD cases. Nineteen persons were excluded as potential BDD cases based on the eating disorder related question (question D). Based on the S-section, this turned out to be largely correct for the majority, however, in 8% (n = 4) of the cases BDD was probably missed. The convergent validity appeared to be high (r > 0.80) with three other BDD measures. The BDDS-5 is a valid and widely applicable screener for BDD that may help in the early detection of BDD. The BDDS-5 uses simple wording and is thus suitable for people 8 years and older.

Eye movement desensitization and processing for adolescents with major depressive disorder: study protocol for a multi-site randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common mental disorders in adolescence carrying a serious risk of adverse development later in life. Extant treatments are limited in effectiveness and have high drop-out and relapse rates. A body of literature has been published on the association between distressing/ traumatic experiences and development and maintenance of MDD, but the effectiveness of a trauma-focused treatment approach for MDD has hardly been studied. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy as stand-alone intervention in adolescents diagnosed with MDD. METHODS: This study will be a randomized controlled trial with two conditions: (1) EMDR treatment (6 sessions) and (2) waiting list condition (WL: 6 weeks, followed by EMDR treatment). First, participants receive a baseline measure after which they will be randomized. Participants will be assessed post-intervention after which the WL participants will also receive six EMDR sessions. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 3 and 6 months follow-up. STUDY POPULATION: In total, 64 adolescents (aged 12-18) diagnosed with a major depressive disorder (DSM-5) and identified memories of at least one distressing or traumatic event related to the depressive symptomatology will be included. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome variables will be the percentage of patients meeting criteria for MDD classification, and level of depressive symptoms. Secondary outcome measures include symptoms of PTSD, anxiety, and general social-emotional problems. At baseline, family functioning and having experienced emotional abuse or neglect will be assessed to explore whether these factors predict post-treatment outcome. DISCUSSION: With the present study, we aim to investigate whether EMDR as a trauma-focussed brief intervention may be effective for adolescents with a primary diagnosis of MDD. EMDR has been proven an effective treatment for traumatic memories in other disorders. It is hypothesized that traumatic memories play a role in the onset and maintenance of depressive disorders. Particularly in adolescence, early treatment of these traumatic memories is warranted to prevent a more chronic or recurrent course of the disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP): NL9008 (30-10-2020).

[Measuring changes during the treatment of eating disorders: a comparison of two types of questionnaires]. / Het meten van verandering tijdens behandeling voor eetstoornissen: een vergelijking van algemene en specifieke vragenlijst.

BACKGROUND: In mental health care routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has become an important part of everyday clinical practice in the Netherlands. It is important that the questionnaires involved are sensitive to therapeutic change. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a generic instrument that is widely used and that seems to be responsive to therapeutic change. However, in relation to patients with an eating disorder, more valuable information might be obtained from a questionnaire that is better geared to the primary symptoms of the eating disorder.
AIM: To find out whether the BSI and the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), which is a questionnaire designed to measure eating disorder psychopathology, reveal different degrees of therapeutic change in patients with an eating disorder.
METHOD: The sample consisted of 1062 patients seeking treatment for an eating disorder (DSM-IV). We performed an analysis of variance (2 x 2 design) in order to detect any difference between the two instruments regarding their sensitivity to change at the two time points. Patients were divided into four categories: recovered, improved, unchanged or deteriorated. We used a chi-squares test to determine whether the two questionnaires differed with regard to the proportions they gave for improved and recovered patients.
RESULTS: The analyses revealed that in this patient group the EDE-Q was more sensitive to change than the BSI. The percentage of patients in the categories 'recovered' and 'improved' was higher in the EDE-Q than in the BSI. The same practice emerged with regards to the various subtypes of eating disorders.
CONCLUSION: It does seem to matter what type of questionnaire is used to measure the course and outcome of treatment. When responsiveness to change is being measured, it is important to use an instrument that assesses the symptoms that are the primary focus of treatment. If the primary aim is to reduce eating disorder symptoms, then the best type of questionnaire to use is one that assesses eating disorder psychopathology.

Cost-utility of an internet-based intervention with or without therapist support in comparison with a waiting list for individuals with eating disorder symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-utility of the internet-based intervention "Featback" provided with different levels of therapist support, in comparison to a waiting list. METHOD: This economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective and was part of a randomized controlled trial in which participants (N = 354) with self-reported ED symptoms were randomized to: (1) 8 weeks of Featback, consisting of psychoeducation and a fully automated monitoring- and feedback system, (2) Featback with low-intensity (weekly) therapist support, (3) Featback with high-intensity (three times a week) therapist support, and (4) a waiting list. Participants were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. Cost-utility acceptability curves were constructed. RESULTS: No significant differences between the study conditions were found regarding quality-adjusted life-years (P = 0.55) and societal costs (P = 0.45), although the mean costs per participant were lowest in the Featback condition with low-intensity therapist support (€1951), followed by Featback with high-intensity therapist support (€2032), Featback without therapist support (€2102), and the waiting list (€2582). Featback seemed to be cost-effective as compared to the waiting list. No clear preference was found for Featback with or without therapist support. DISCUSSION: A fully automated Internet-based intervention for ED symptoms with no, low-, or high-intensity therapist support represented good value for money when compared to a waiting list. This finding may have important implications for clinical practice, as both the unguided- and guided intervention could allow for more efficient care and widespread dissemination, potentially increasing the accessibility and availability of mental health care services for individuals with ED symptoms. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49:1068-1076).

[EDNOS is an eating disorder of clinical relevance, on a par with anorexia and bulimia nervosa]. / Eetstoornissen niet anderszins omschreven: een echte eetstoornis.

BACKGROUND: The category 'eating disorder 'not otherwise specified'' (EDNOS) in DSM-IV is restricted to eating disorders of clinical severity that do not completely fulfil the criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosa. The EDNOS category is, by definition, often regarded as a a residual category and in principle designed to incorporate a small group of patients with atypical characteristics. Health insurance companies argue that the treatment of patients diagnosed with EDNOS should not be treated in mental health institutions and therefore should not get their treatment costs reimbursed by the insurance companies. The most important argument of the insurance companies is that patients in the EDNOS category do not display serious psychiatric symptoms. AIM: The aim of this paper is to show that EDNOS is an eating disorder category of clinical relevance. The article provides a critical overview of literature on EDNOS which studies the prevalence, severity and course of the disorder. We also discuss to what extent the fifth version of dsm solves the problems relating to this residual category. METHOD: We reviewed the literature. RESULTS: The classification given in DSM-IV is not an accurate reflection of clinical reality. Half of the patients presenting with an eating disorder and seeking treatment do meet the criteria for EDNOS. The duration and the severity of eating disorder psychopathology, the presence of comorbidity, the mortality, and the use of the mental health care services by individuals with an eating disorder appear to be very similar in EDNOS patients and in patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Eating disorder classifications can be regarded as snapshots taken throughout the course of an illness. Over of the years patients can be afflicted with various subtypes of an eating disorder. DSM-5 places fewer patients in the EDNOS category that did DSM-IV. CONCLUSION: In the latest version of dsm, namely DSM-5, the number of patients with an eating disorder classified as EDNOS has declined. There appears to be sufficient scientific evidence for EDNOS to be considered as an eating-disorder category of clinical severity, comparable to anorexia and bulimia nervosa. In our view, patients classified as having EDNOS should be offered regular treatment in mental health institutions.

Maladaptive core beliefs and eating disorder symptoms.

This study compared maladaptive core beliefs of eating-disordered groups (full and subthreshold syndrome) and healthy controls and investigated the association between eating disorder symptoms and core beliefs. Participants were compared on self-report measures of core beliefs (YSQ) and eating disorder psychopathology (BITE). Anorexia nervosa (AN; both subtypes) and bulimia nervosa (BN) patients had significantly more core beliefs than healthy controls. Binge eating disorder (BED) patients had intermediate scores between AN and BN on the one hand and healthy controls on the other hand. No correlation was found between core beliefs and frequency of binge eating. Frequency of vomiting, laxative misuse and fasting was positively associated with all domains of core beliefs. Patients with eating disorders have some core beliefs which are not directly related to eating, weight or shape. Frequency of purging and fasting behaviors is associated with more severe maladaptive core beliefs. Our data demonstrate the importance of identifying purging and fasting as significant clinical markers.

Binge eating disorder: a review.

Binge eating disorder (BED) is a new proposed eating disorder in the DSM-IV. BED is not a formal diagnosis within the DSM-IV, but in day-to-day clinical practice the diagnosis seems to be generally accepted. People with the BED-syndrome have binge eating episodes as do subjects with bulimia nervosa, but unlike the latter they do not engage in compensatory behaviours. Although the diagnosis BED was created with the obese in mind, obesity is not a criterion. This paper gives an overview of its epidemiology, characteristics, aetiology, criteria, course and treatment. BED seems to be highly prevalent among subjects seeking weight loss treatment (1.3-30.1%). Studies with compared BED, BN and obesity indicated that individuals with BED exhibit levels of psychopathology that fall somewhere between the high levels reported by individuals with BN and the low levels reported by obese individuals. Characteristics of BED seemed to bear a closer resemblance to those of BN than of those of obesity.A review of RCT's showed that presently cognitive behavioural treatment is the treatment of choice but interpersonal psychotherapy, self-help and SSRI's seem effective. The first aim of treatment should be the cessation of binge eating. Treatment of weight loss may be offered to those who are able to abstain from binge eating.

Characteristics of patients with social phobia and their treatment in specialized clinics for anxiety disorders in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Social phobia frequently occurs in the general population but is probably underreported due to comorbid disorders which mask the social phobia. Another reason might be that patients do not consult their general pratitioner due to embarrassment or an estimation of their condition. There are several treatments available for social phobia, but not enough is known about the efficacy of the different treatments strategies. METHODS: A retrospective, medical record-based study was carried out in four outpatient clinics specializing in treatment of anxiety disorders to investigate the characteristics of 64 patients with a DSM-IV axis diagnosis of social phobia who seeked help for their problems. Therapies for social phobia within these clinics and differences between these clinics were evaluated. RESULTS: Men with a high educational level tended to seek more help and comorbid disorders tended to cause more impairment in functioning. Further, there is a large delay between onset and therapy attendance (mean 14 years). Finally, there was consistency in the treatment of social phobia in these four clinics which consisted of cognitive behavioral therapy and/or medication. LIMITATIONS: The study is retrospective and based on medical records which means there was no objective measurement of the effectiveness of the therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-five percent of patients improved after treatment independent of the kind of therapy, the occurrence of comorbid disorders and the type of social phobia.