ABSTRACT
Critically ill patients who are intubated undergo multiple chest X-rays (CXRs) to determine endotracheal tube position; however, other modalities can save time, medical expenses, and radiation exposure. In this article, we evaluated the validity and interrater reliability of ultrasound to confirm endotracheal tube (ETT) position in patients. A prospective study was performed on intubated patients with cuffed ETTs. The accuracy of ultrasound to confirm correct ETT placement in 92 patients was 97.8%. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and agreement of 97.7, 93.3, and 91.3% were found on comparing ultrasound to CXR findings. Ultrasound is feasible, reliable, and has good interrater reliability in assessing correct ETT position in children.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of introducing patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds in the medical ICU with respect to rounding efficiency, provider satisfaction, and patient/family satisfaction. DESIGN: A prospective, nonblinded, nonrandomized, parallel group study from June 21, 2016, to August 15, 2016. SETTING: The medical ICU at a tertiary care academic medical center. SUBJECTS: A consecutive sample of adult patients, family members, and healthcare providers. The patients and healthcare providers were arbitrarily assigned to either the patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds or nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round care team. INTERVENTIONS: Healthcare providers on the patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds team were educated about their respective roles and the information they were expected to discuss on rounds each day. Rounds completion data and satisfaction questionnaires from healthcare providers, patients, and family members were obtained from both patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds and nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round teams. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained from 367 patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds and 298 nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round patient encounters. Family members were present during 31.1% rounding encounters on the patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds team and 10.1% encounters on the nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round team (p < 0.01). Total rounding and interruption times were significantly shorter on patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds compared with nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round patients, 16.9 ± 10.0 versus 22.4 ± 14.9 and 2.0 ± 2.2 versus 3.9 ± 5.5 minutes, respectively (both p < 0.01). Mechanical ventilation, patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, and attending style independently contributed to the earlier completion of rounds (all p < 0.01). Surveys of 338 healthcare provider encounters on the patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds team compared with 301 nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round encounters showed perceptions of improved communication of patient management plans, increased input from the entire team, and clarity on task assignments (all p < 0.05). The attending physicians provided teaching points on 51.2% of patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds compared with 33.9% of nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round patient encounters (p < 0.01). For the patients and family members surveyed, 38 patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds, and 30 nonstructured interdisciplinary bedside round, there were no differences in measures of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds provide a venue for increased rounding efficiency, provider satisfaction, and consistent teaching, without impacting patient/family perception.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Patient-Centered Care , Teaching Rounds , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , California , Caregivers , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is increasingly becoming the preferred method, compared with open surgical tracheostomy, for patients requiring chronic ventilatory assistance. Little is known regarding the process involved to incorporate PDT as a standard service in the medical intensive care unit. In this report, we describe our experience developing a "PDT service" led by medical intensivists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With support from our leadership and surgical colleagues, we developed a credentialing and training process for medical intensivists, formulated a bedside team to perform PDT, refined our technique, and maintained a patient data registry for quality improvement. RESULTS: To date, our service includes 4 medical intensivists with PDT privileges. Over a 4-year period, we performed 171 PDTs for patients in the medical intensive care unit after 12.1 ± 8.2 days of mechanical ventilation. Our procedure-related complication rates are similar to other reports. No patient required emergent open surgical tracheostomy, and there were no deaths related to PDT. We required minimal to no backup support from our surgical colleagues in performing PDT. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a medical intensivist-driven PDT service, sharing our unique successes and challenges, to facilitate the care of our patients requiring prolonged ventilator support.
