On variants and vaccines: The effectiveness of Covid-19 monoclonal antibody therapy during two distinct periods in the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: While Covid-19 monoclonal antibody therapies (Mab) have been available in the outpatient setting for over a year and a half, little is known about the impact of emerging variants and vaccinations on the effectiveness of Mab therapies. We sought to determine the effectiveness of Covid-19 Mab therapies during the first two waves of the pandemic in Los Angeles County and assess the impact of vaccines, variants, and other confounding factors. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We retrospectively examined records for 2209 patients of with confirmed positive molecular SARS-CoV2 test either referred for outpatient Mab therapy or receiving Mab treatment in the emergency department (ED) between December 2020 and 2021. Our primary outcome was the combined 30-day incidence of ED visit, hospitalization, or death following the date of referral. Additionally, SARS-CoV2 isolates of hospitalized patients receiving Mabs were sequenced. The primary outcome was significantly reduced with combination therapy compared to bamlanivimab or no treatment (aHR 0·60; 95% CI ·37, ·99), with greater benefit in unvaccinated, moderate-to-high-risk patients (aHR ·39; 95% CI ·20, ·77). Significant associations with the primary outcome included history of lung disease (HR 7·13; 95% CI 5·12, 9·95), immunocompromised state (HR 6·59; 95% CI 2·91-14·94), and high social vulnerability (HR 2·29, 95% CI 1·56-3·36). Two predominant variants were noted during the period of observation: the Epsilon variant and the Delta variant. CONCLUSIONS: Only select monoclonal antibody therapies significantly reduced ED visits, hospitalizations, and death due to COVID-19 during. Vaccination diminished effectiveness of Mabs. Variant data and vaccination status should be considered when assessing the benefit of novel COVID-19 treatments.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of S-1 between Caucasian and East Asian patients.

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine anti-neoplastic agent that is converted by CYP2A6 to 5-fluorouracil (5FU). We prospectively studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of S-1 in two groups of East Asian and Caucasian patients with solid malignancy refractory to standard chemotherapy, or for which 5FU was indicated, to elucidate differences in relation to CYP2A6 genotype and phenotype. S-1 was given orally at 30 mg/m(2) b.i.d. for 14 days every 21 days. Dose normalized AUC(0-48 h) for tegafur (P = 0.05) and gimeracil (P = 0.036) were higher in East Asians; conversely, AUC(0-48 h) of fluoro-ß-alanine was higher in Caucasians (P = 0.044). Exposure to 5FU was similar in both groups (P = 0.967). Mean cotinine:nicotine ratio was 54% higher in the Caucasian group (P = 0.03), and correlated with oral clearance of tegafur (r = 0.59; P = 0.002). Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicities were more common in Caucasians than Asians (21%vs 0%). Treatment with S-1 yields no significant difference in 5FU exposure between Caucasians and East Asians.

Electrocardiographic characterization of the QTc interval in patients with advanced solid tumors: pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic evaluation of sunitinib.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, on the QT interval in patients with cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received sunitinib loading doses (150-200 mg) on days 3 and 9 and maintenance doses (50 mg/d) on days 4 to 8. Moxifloxacin (day 1), placebo (day 2), and granisetron [with placebo (day 2) or sunitinib (days 3 and 9)] were also administered. Treatment effects were evaluated by time-matched, serial electrocardiograms, and manually overread. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 48 patients were QT/PK evaluable. Moxifloxacin produced a time-matched, maximum mean placebo-adjusted corrected QT interval (QT(c)F) of 5.6 ms [90% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-9.3]. Sunitinib QT(c)F changes correlated with exposure, but not T(max). Maximum mean time-matched, placebo-adjusted QT(c)F was 9.6 ms (90% CI, 4.1-15.1) at steady state/therapeutic concentrations (day 3) and 15.4 ms (90% CI, 8.4-22.4) at supratherapeutic concentrations (day 9). No patient had a QT(c)F >500 ms. Concomitant granisetron produced no significant QT(c)F prolongation. Sunitinib-related adverse events were as previously described. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib has a dose-dependent effect on QT interval. The increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias must be weighed against the therapeutic benefit sunitinib provides to patients with advanced cancer.

Sunitinib induces hypothyroidism in advanced cancer patients and may inhibit thyroid peroxidase activity.

OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic effects. An observed higher than expected rate of hypothyroidism in sunitinib-treated patients prompted assessment of the incidence of hypothyroidism. DESIGN: Patients taking sunitinib had their thyroid function tests (TFTs) assessed via chart review. To explore potential effects on the thyroid, we examined the antiperoxidase activity of sunitinib by in vitro testing its effect on guaiacol oxidation and protein iodination by lactoperoxidase. MAIN OUTCOME: Of the 89 patients who took sunitinib, 49 patients were excluded from analysis for several reasons. Of the remaining 40 patients, 21 (53%, 24% of the original 89) developed elevated thyrotropin (TSH) after a median of 5 months (range 1-36 months). Median TSH was 21.4 mU/L (range 4.6-174 mU/L). In vitro, sunitinib had antiperoxidase activity that was about one-fourth the potency of propylthiouracil. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 40 patients who had TFTs assessed after starting sunitinib, 53% developed elevated TSH. We recommend that all patients treated with sunitinib be monitored for hypothyroidism. The mechanism of the antithyroid effect appears to be inhibition of peroxidase activity. Further research is needed to confirm the mechanism by which sunitinib induces hypothyroidism.