Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.

The deception literature has predominantly focused on detection of guilty individuals using electrodermal measures. Little research has examined other psychophysiological measures or the mechanisms underlying deception. Therefore, the present study examined pupillary responses in a differentiation-of-deception paradigm. Twenty-four undergraduate participants answered the same questions twice, once truthfully and once deceptively, while pupillary responses were recorded. Questions were based on recently learned (episodic) information from scenarios or on general (semantic) knowledge from long-term memory. Task-evoked pupil dilation was significantly greater when participants confabulated responses than when they told the truth for both episodic and semantic memory questions. Previous research has demonstrated that pupil size increases with increased cognitive processing load. The present study suggested that generating deceptive recall was associated with increased pupil size and required greater cognitive processing than truthful recall.

Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task.

Task-evoked pupillary responses were recorded during a visual backward masking task as an index of resource allocation. Increased pupillary dilation indicates increased allocation of processing resources to the task. Consistent with numerous studies, detection accuracy increased with longer interstimulus intervals and approximated no-mask accuracy in the 300-ms condition. Pupillary dilation responses were significantly greater during task performance (cognitive load) than during a passive stimulus viewing condition (no-load) and were significantly greater in the 300-ms condition than the no-mask condition. Consistent with models of early visual information processing, the results suggest that the mask demanded extra processing resources when it followed the target by more than 100 ms. Pupillography methods may be useful in evaluating the contribution and timing of resource-demanding processes during early visual information processing.

Positive and negative schizotypal symptoms relate to different aspects of crossover reaction time task performance.

Although the expressions of both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum illnesses can each occur with varying degrees of severity, researchers have often dichotomized patients as generally positive or negative subtypes. Studies of schizophrenia and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD) have not typically controlled for the severity of the other symptom types when examining the relationship between positive and negative symptom subtypes and cognitive impairment. The present study investigated the relationship between the severity of both symptom types and reaction time crossover task performance in SPD in groups made equivalent on the severity of the other type of symptom. Fifty-eight out of 458 undergraduates were screened into one of four groups (high negative-high positive, low negative-low positive, high negative-low positive or low negative-high positive) by the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and assessed with the reaction time crossover task. The results indicated that negative schizotypal symptoms were associated with the early crossover pattern, while positive schizotypal symptoms related to longer overall reaction time. Therefore, different cognitive mechanisms involved in crossover task performance appeared to be associated with different symptom subtypes.