[Cognitive disorders and falls: experience of the Lille multidisciplinary falls service]. / Troubles cognitifs et chutes: l'expérience de la consultation multidisciplinaire de la chute de Lille.

BACKGROUND: Falls and dementia are two major public health problems which concern the elderly population. Cognitive impairment, as a result of Alzheimer's disease or non-Alzheimer dementia, is recognized as a risk factor for falling. Through the experience of the Multidisciplinary Falls Consultation, our aims were first, to evaluate the prevalence of a cognitive decline among outpatients who consult for falls, and second, to determine whether the cognitive impairment was known and diagnosed before the consultation or not. METHODS: Data concerning the first 300 outpatients who completed the initial evaluation are reported. Each patient was assessed by a geriatrician, a neurologist, and a physiatrist, who visited him or her at home. Cognitive impairment was defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score<24. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients, 228 patients completed the initial evaluation. Among them, 97 (42.5 percent) had a MMSE score<24; 55 had mild stage dementia (MMSE score between 23 and 18) and 42 were at a moderate or severe stage (MMSE score< or =17/30). The cognitive decline was not diagnosed before the consultation in 80 of the 97 patients (82 percent). CONCLUSION: The findings show that a large proportion of old persons presenting with gait disturbance at the Multidisciplinary Falls Consultation have an underlying cognitive decline. Assessment of cognitive functions is required in every elderly faller.

[The education level of elderly diabetics]. / Le niveau d'éducation des diabétiques âgés.

OBJECTIVE: The education of diabetic subjects has been the object of numerous studies which have demonstrated its importance as an integral part of treatment. Few studies have focused on the particular problem of education in the elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An inquiry was conducted in 60 elderly patients with diabetes in order to assess their knowledge of the disease, comparing those who had received specific education and those who had not, and to determine the characteristic features of patients who had received education. A specific questionnaire was designed for this study. The maximal score was 50. RESULTS: Mean age of the 60 patients was 77 years (range 65-94). Lack of knowledge was most patent concerning acute metabolic decompensation with hypoglycemia an hyperglycemia and concerning foot care. Only one-third of the patients had received diabetic education. The average score in the educated group was 42 +/- 0.4 versus 23 +/- 7 in the non-educated group (p = 0.0001). The best results were obtained in educated and younger patients. The inquiry showed that education had been distributed preferentially to the youngest patients, to men, and to patients treated with insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that elderly diabetics can benefit from an education program and prove a real insufficiency in current education of elderly diabetics. These results should also lead to further work on an educational tool specifically designed for elderly diabetics.