Advances in the Clinical Application of High-throughput Proteomics.

High-throughput proteomics has become an exciting field and a potential frontier of modern medicine since the early 2000s. While significant progress has been made in the technical aspects of the field, translating proteomics to clinical applications has been challenging. This review summarizes recent advances in clinical applications of high-throughput proteomics and discusses the associated challenges, advantages, and future directions. We focus on research progress and clinical applications of high-throughput proteomics in breast cancer, bladder cancer, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and coronavirus disease 2019. The future application of high-throughput proteomics will face challenges such as varying protein properties, limitations of statistical modeling, technical and logistical difficulties in data deposition, integration, and harmonization, as well as regulatory requirements for clinical validation and considerations. However, there are several noteworthy advantages of high-throughput proteomics, including the identification of novel global protein networks, the discovery of new proteins, and the synergistic incorporation with other omic data. We look forward to participating in and embracing future advances in high-throughput proteomics, such as proteomics-based single-cell biology and its clinical applications, individualized proteomics, pathology informatics, digital pathology, and deep learning models for high-throughput proteomics. Several new proteomic technologies are noteworthy, including data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, nanopore-based proteomics, 4-D proteomics, and secondary ion mass spectrometry. In summary, we believe high-throughput proteomics will drastically shift the paradigm of translational research, clinical practice, and public health in the near future.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancer.

Advanced gynecologic cancers have historically lacked effective treatment options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, offering durable responses for some patients. In addition, many immunotherapy strategies are under investigation for the treatment of earlier stages of disease or in other gynecologic cancers, such as ovarian cancer and rare gynecologic tumors. While the integration of ICIs into the standard of care has improved outcomes for patients, their use requires a nuanced understanding of biomarker testing, treatment selection, patient selection, response evaluation and surveillance, and patient quality of life considerations, among other topics. To address this need for guidance, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline. The Expert Panel drew on the published literature as well as their own clinical experience to develop evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to provide guidance to cancer care professionals treating patients with gynecologic cancer.

A Phase I/II Trial of HER2 Vaccine-Primed Autologous T-Cell Infusions in Patients with Treatment Refractory HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: High levels of type I T cells are needed for tumor eradication. We evaluated whether the HER2-specific vaccine-primed T cells are readily expanded ex vivo to achieve levels needed for therapeutic infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I/II nonrandomized trial of escalating doses of ex vivo-expanded HER2-specific T cells after in vivo priming with a multiple peptide-based HER2 intracellular domain (ICD) vaccine. Vaccines were given weekly for a total of three immunizations. Two weeks after the third vaccine, patients underwent leukapheresis for T-cell expansion, then received three escalating cell doses over 7- to 10-day intervals. Booster vaccines were administered after the T-cell infusions. The primary objective was safety. The secondary objectives included extent and persistence of HER2-specific T cells, development of epitope spreading, and clinical response. Patients received a CT scan prior to enrollment and 1 month after the last T-cell infusion. RESULTS: Nineteen patients received T-cell infusions. Treatment was well tolerated. One month after the last T-cell infusion, 82% of patients had significantly augmented T cells to at least one of the immunizing epitopes and 81% of patients demonstrated enhanced intramolecular epitope spreading compared with baseline (P < 0.05). There were no complete responses, one partial response (6%), and eight patients with stable disease (47%), for a disease control rate of 53%. The median survival for those with progressive disease was 20.5 months and for responders (PR+SD) was 45.0 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adoptive transfer of HER2 vaccine-primed T cells was feasible, was associated with minimal toxicity, and resulted in an increased overall survival in responding patients. See related commentary by Crosby et al., p. 3256.

Safety and Outcomes of a Plasmid DNA Vaccine Encoding the ERBB2 Intracellular Domain in Patients With Advanced-Stage ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: High levels of ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-specific type 1 T cells in the peripheral blood are associated with favorable clinical outcomes after trastuzumab therapy; however, only a minority of patients develop measurable ERBB2 immunity after treatment. Vaccines designed to increase ERBB2-specific T-helper cells could induce ERBB2 immunity in a majority of patients. Objective: To determine the safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses (10, 100, and 500 µg) of a plasmid-based vaccine encoding the ERBB2 intracellular domain (ICD). Design, Setting, and Participants: Single-arm phase 1 trial including 66 patients with advanced-stage ERBB2-positive breast cancer treated in an academic medical center between 2001 and 2010 with 10-year postvaccine toxicity assessments. Data analysis was performed over 2 periods: January 2012 to March 2013 and July 2021 to August 2022. Interventions: Patients were sequentially enrolled to the 3 dose arms. The vaccine was administered intradermally once a month with soluble granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor as an adjuvant for 3 immunizations. Toxicity evaluations occurred at set intervals and yearly. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected for evaluation of immunity. Biopsy of vaccine sites at weeks 16 and 36 measured DNA persistence. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, and ERBB2 ICD immune responses were measured by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot. Secondary objectives determined if vaccine dose was associated with immunity and evaluated persistence of plasmid DNA at the vaccine site. Results: A total of 66 patients (median [range] age, 51 [34-77] years) were enrolled. The majority of vaccine-related toxic effects were grade 1 and 2 and not significantly different between dose arms. Patients in arm 2 (100 µg) and arm 3 (500 µg) had higher magnitude ERBB2 ICD type 1 immune responses at most time points than arm 1 (10 µg) (arm 2 compared with arm 1, coefficient, 181 [95% CI, 60-303]; P = .003; arm 3 compared with arm 1, coefficient, 233 [95% CI, 102-363]; P < .001) after adjusting for baseline factors. ERBB2 ICD immunity at time points after the end of immunizations was significantly lower on average in patients with DNA persistence at week 16 compared with those without persistence. The highest vaccine dose was associated with the greatest incidence of persistent DNA at the injection site. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 1 nonrandomized clinical trial, immunization with the 100-µg dose of the ERBB2 ICD plasmid-based vaccine was associated with generation of ERBB2-specific type 1 T cells in most patients with ERBB2-expressing breast cancer, and it is currently being evaluated in randomized phase 2 trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00436254.

Novel peptide-based vaccine targeting heat shock protein 90 induces effective antitumor immunity in a HER2+ breast cancer murine model.

BACKGROUND: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a protein chaperone for most of the important signal transduction pathways in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Akt. The aim of our study is to identify peptide-based vaccines and to develop an effective immunotherapeutics for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer. METHODS: HSP90-derived major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II epitopes were selected using in silico algorithms and validated by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT). In vivo antitumor efficacy was evaluated in MMTVneu-transgenic mice. HSP90 peptide-specific systemic T-cell responses were assessed using interferon gamma ELISPOT assay, and immune microenvironment in tumors was evaluated using multiplex immunohistochemistry and TCRß sequencing. RESULTS: First, candidate HSP90-derived MHC class II epitopes with high binding affinities across multiple human HLA class II genotypes were identified using in silico algorithms. Among the top 10 peptides, p485 and p527 were selected as promising Th1 immunity-inducing epitopes with low potential for Th2 immunity induction. The selected MHC class II HSP90 peptides induced strong antigen-specific T cell responses, which was induced by cross-priming of CD8+ T cells in vivo. The HSP90 peptide vaccines were effective in the established tumor model, and their efficacy was further enhanced when combined with stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist and/or anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 antibody in MMTVneu-transgenic mice. Increased tumor rejection was associated with increased systemic HSP90-specific T-cell responses, increased T-cell recruitment in tumor microenvironment, intermolecular epitope spreading, and increased rearrangement of TCRß by STING agonist. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we have provided the first preclinical evidence of the action mechanism of HSP90 peptide vaccines with a distinct potential for improving breast cancer treatment.