Doxycycline Versus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Rectal Chlamydia in Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Azithromycin and doxycycline are both recommended treatments for rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection, but observational studies suggest that doxycycline may be more effective. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial compared azithromycin (single 1-g dose) versus doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 7 days) for the treatment of rectal CT in men who have sex with men (MSM) in Seattle and Boston. Participants were enrolled after a diagnosis of rectal CT in clinical care and underwent repeated collection of rectal swabs for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) at study enrollment and 2 weeks and 4 weeks postenrollment. The primary outcome was microbiologic cure (CT-negative NAAT) at 4 weeks. The complete case (CC) population included participants with a CT-positive NAAT at enrollment and a follow-up NAAT result; the intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. RESULTS: Among 177 participants enrolled, 135 (76%) met CC population criteria for the 4-week follow-up visit. Thirty-three participants (19%) were excluded because the CT NAAT repeated at enrollment was negative. Microbiologic cure was higher with doxycycline than azithromycin in both the CC population (100% [70 of 70] vs 74% [48 of 65]; absolute difference, 26%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16-36%; P < .001) and the ITT population (91% [80 of 88] vs 71% [63 of 89]; absolute difference, 20%; 95% CI, 9-31%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week course of doxycycline was significantly more effective than a single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of rectal CT in MSM. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03608774.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Vaginal Anti-infective, TOL-463, in the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis and Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Randomized, Single-blind, Phase 2, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) present serious reproductive health risks and management challenges, with poor control attributed to survival of treatment-resistant biofilm communities. Boric acid is used in various regimens for non-albicans VVC and recurrent BV. We investigated safety and efficacy of a novel boric acid-based vaginal anti-infective with enhanced antibiofilm activity (TOL-463) in treating BV and VVC. METHODS: In this phase 2 randomized, investigator-blinded trial conducted at 2 sexual health clinics, women with BV or VVC were randomly assigned (1:1) to 7 nights of TOL-463 vaginal gel or insert. The primary test of cure (TOC) was clinical cure at day 9-12; safety was assessed at TOC and day 21-30. RESULTS: One hundred six participants (53 with BV, 36 VVC, 17 both) were enrolled; most were African American (69%). Clinical cure rate of BV at TOC was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-75%) for TOL-463 insert and 50% (95% CI, 31%-69%) for TOL-463 gel, and for VVC, 92% (95% CI, 67%-99%) for TOL-463 insert and 81% (95% CI, 57%-93%) for TOL-463 gel. Both products were safe and well tolerated with no secondary cases of VVC; vulvovaginal burning was the most common adverse event (9.6%). CONCLUSIONS: TOL-463, especially in vaginal insert form, is effective and safe in treating BV and VVC. Future studies should assess the potential role of TOL-463 as a biofilm disrupter in enhancing likelihood of cure relative to approved therapies, reducing recurrence rates, and combined with traditional antimicrobials. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02866227.