ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was to collect data concerning the use of antibiotics (AB) in dogs and cats in veterinary practices and clinics in Bavaria, Germany. It was evaluated, whether changes in the use of AB since the amendment of the Verordnung über Tierärztliche Hausapotheken (TÄHAV, German Regulation on the Veterinary In-house Pharmacy) in March 2018 could be documented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using 2 anonymous online surveys in 2017 and 2020, veterinarians treating dogs and cats in Bavaria were questioned about their usage of AB and their assessment of the current antimicrobial resistance situation. The results of both surveys were evaluated statistically and compared with each other. RESULTS: While in 2017 a total of 238 questionaries were evaluated, 160 could be included in 2020. The three most commonly used antibiotics for systemic therapy were Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (74.8 % of veterinarians), Enrofloxacin (56.7 %) and Amoxicillin (53.4 %) in 2017; and Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (88.8 %), Amoxicillin (67.5 %) and Metronidazole (33.8 %) in 2020, respectively. The participating veterinarians stated that their overall use of 3 rd and 4th generations cephalosporins (from 20.2 % of veterinarians in 2017 to 9.4 % in 2020, p = 0,005) as well as fluoroquinolones (from 80.3 % to 33.1 %, p < 0.001) had significantly declined. In 2020, the choice of AB in veterinarians was affected by legal requirements (83.8 %), tolerability (81.3 %), way of application (76.9 %), acceptance by the patient (70.0 %), and frequency of application (64.4 %), with the last parameter being significantly more important to veterinarians working in a practice (83.8 %, p = 0.004) than to veterinarians in a clinic. CONCLUSION: Veterinarians report a significantly reduced usage of fluoroquinolones and 3 rd and 4th generation cephalosporines in dogs and cats compared to 2017. These changes in prescribing practice could be a consequence of the amendment of the TÄHAV, which dictates a prohibition of rededication as well as an obligation for microbial sensitivity testing for these AB classes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Legal restrictions could have a positive influence on the amount and type of antibiotics used and therefore help to prevent antimicrobial resistance.
