Association between Geriatric 8 frailty and health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer (PROGNOSIS-G8): a Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is highly valued among older adults with cancer. The Geriatric 8 screening tool identifies individuals with frailty, but its association with HRQoL remains sparsely investigated. Herein, we evaluate whether Geriatric 8 frailty is associated with short-term and long-term HRQoL in older patients with cancer. METHODS: In this Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study, patients aged 70 years and older, referred to oncological assessment for solid cancers, were screened with the Geriatric 8. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Elderly 14 (ELD14) questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. Patient characteristics were obtained from medical records. Differences in mean global health status and QoL (GHS), measured using the two seven-point Likert scale questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 regarding overall health and QoL during the past week, between patients with frailty (defined as a Geriatric 8 score of ≤14) and without frailty within 12 months were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were differences in the mean EORTC Summary Score comprised of all questions from the QLQ-C30 except for those included in the GHS and a question concerning financial difficulties, and five functional (physical, role, and social functioning, maintaining purpose, and family support from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC-QLQ-ELD14), and five symptom scales (fatigue, pain, mobility, future worries, and burden of illness from the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the EORTC-QLQ-ELD14). Analyses were done using linear mixed models. All primary and secondary outcomes were adjusted for gender, treatment intent, and cancer type and the primary outcome was also assessed by means of a responder analysis. FINDINGS: Between June 1, 2020 and Oct 15, 2021, 1398 eligible patients were screened with the Geriatric 8 (908 [65%] with frailty and 490 [35%] without frailty) and provided medical record data. Of these patients, 707 (51%) also provided HRQoL data (437 [62%] with frailty and 270 [38%] without frailty). When adjusted, patients with frailty had poorer GHS (-15·1, 95% CI -18·5 to -11·6; p<0·0001) at baseline and throughout follow-up (3 months -7·4, -11·0 to -3·7, p=0·0001; 6 months -11·7, -15·5 to -7·9, p<0·0001; 9 months -10·4, -14·3 to -6·5, p<0·0001; 12 months -10·4, -14·6 to -6·2, p<0·0001) compared to patients without frailty. Adjusted summary scores were also poorer for patients with frailty (-9·9, 95% CI -12·1 to -7·6; p<0·0001) compared to patients without frailty at baseline and throughout follow-up (3 months -8·2, -10·5 to -5·8, p=0·0001; 6 months -9·0, -11·4 to -6·6, p<0·0001; 9 months -9·2, -11·7 to -6·8, p<0·0001; 12 months -8·9, -11·5 to -6·3, p<0·0001). Patients with frailty had significantly worse physical and role functioning, mobility, and fatigue outcomes, with no differences in family support within 12 months, at all timepoints. INTERPRETATION: Older patients with cancer and frailty have significantly poorer HRQoL than those without frailty within the 12 months following an oncology referral. Thus, by identifying and treating frailty, we can ultimately improve patient HRQoL. FUNDING: The Danish Cancer Society, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Dagmar Marshalls Fond, and Agnes and Poul Friis Fond.

Effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on hospitalizations in older adults with frailty initiating curatively intended oncologic treatment: The PROGNOSIS-RCT study.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty constitutes a risk for unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with cancer. This study examines whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) as an add-on to standard oncologic care can prevent unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with frailty and cancer who initiate curative oncological treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included older adults aged ≥70 with frailty (Geriatric 8 [G8] ≤14), and solid cancers who initiated curative oncological treatment. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either standard oncologic care (control) or standard oncologic care supplemented with CGA-guided interventions (intervention). Baseline characteristics were retrieved prior to randomization. The primary endpoint, the between-group rate ratio of unplanned hospitalizations within six months of treatment initiation, was analyzed using negative binominal regression. Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach, followed by per-protocol analysis, including participants receiving CGA within 30 days of randomization, and preplanned subgroup analyses based on treatment modality and Geriatric 8 screening. Secondary endpoints included acute hospital contacts, treatment adherence, and toxicity. RESULTS: From November 1, 2020 to May 31, 2023, 173 participants were enrolled. Median age was 75 (interquartile range 72-79), 51.5% were female, 58% had a G8 score > 12, and 84% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. The most common cancer sites were lung (23%), upper gastrointestinal (15%), and breast (13%). The rate (per person-years) of unplanned hospitalization was 1.32 in the intervention group and 1.81 in the control group, with a between-group rate ratio of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.23, P = 0.25) favoring the intervention. The between-group rate ratio increased in the per-protocol analysis (0.64 [95% CI 0.37-1.10, P = 0.10]). Similarly, no significant between group differences were found in treatment adherence, rate of acute hospital contacts, or toxicity. DISCUSSION: In this study, CGA did not significantly reduce the rate of unplanned hospitalizations. Furthermore, no between-group differences were found in treatment adherence, toxicity lead hospitalizations, or treatment completion in older adults with cancer and frailty. However, per-protocol analysis suggests that increasing adherence to CGA may improve the outcome. Larger studies ensuring higher CGA adherence are warranted to confirm our findings.

Geriatric screening and frailty intervention in older patients with cancer.

Frailty in older patients with cancer increases the risk of treatment related toxicity, mortality, physical decline, and quality of life. This review summarises various screening tools. Screening tools identifying frailty serve multiple purposes, providing awareness of health issues impacting oncologic treatment and prognosis and facilitating the delivery of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). CGA is an overall health assessment and treatment targeting frailty. Providing CGA to older patients with cancer reduces the risk of toxicity and functional decline, increases treatment completion, and prevents loss of quality of life.

Determinants of poor quality of life in older patients with cancer: A longitudinal mixed methods study (PROGNOSIS-Q).

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes are becoming more employed in oncologic research because many older patients with cancer prioritize preserved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over prolonged survival. However, few studies have examined the determinants of poor HRQoL in older patients with cancer. This study aims to determine whether HRQoL findings are truly reflective of cancer disease and treatment, as opposed to external factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This longitudinal, mixed-methods study included outpatients, age 70 years or more, with a solid cancer, who reported poor HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global health status/QoL (GHS) score ≤ 33.3), at treatment initiation. A convergent design was employed, in which HRQoL survey data and telephone interview data was collected in parallel at baseline and three-months follow-up. Survey and interview data was analyzed separately and subsequently compared. Thematic analysis of interview data was conducted according to Braun & Clarke, and changes in patients GHS score were calculated using mixed model regression. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 74.7 years were included (12 men and 9 women) and data saturation was achieved at both time intervals. Baseline interviews (n = 21) showed that poor HRQoL at cancer treatment initiation was primarily reflective of participants' initial shock upon receiving their cancer diagnosis and their change in circumstance and sudden functional independence. At three months, three participants were lost to follow-up and two provided only partial data. Most participants experienced an increase in HRQoL, with 60% showing a clinically significant improvement in GHS scores. Interviews showed that this was due to lessening functional dependency and disease acceptance achieved by mental and physical adjustment. HRQoL measures were less reflective of cancer disease and treatment in older patients with preexisting highly disabling comorbidity. DISCUSSION: This study showed good alignment between survey responses and in-depth interviews, demonstrating that both methodologies are highly relevant measures during oncologic treatment. However, for patients with severe comorbidity, HRQoL findings are often more reflective of the steady state of their disabling comorbidity. Response shift may play a part in how participants adjusted to their new circumstances. Promoting caregiver involvement from the time of diagnosis may increase patients´ coping strategies.

Predictive value of geriatric oncology screening and geriatric assessment of older patients with cancer: A randomized clinical trial protocol (PROGNOSIS-RCT).

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been shown to reduce frailty in older patients in general. In older patients with cancer, frailty affects quality of life (QoL), physical function, and survival. However, few studies have examined the effect of CGA as an additional intervention to antineoplastic treatment. This protocol presents a randomized controlled trial, which aims to evaluate the effects of CGA-based interventions in older patients with cancer and Geriatric 8 (G8) identified frailty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial will include patients, age 70+ years, with solid malignancies and G8 frailty (G8 ≤ 14). Patients will be separated into two groups, with different primary endpoints, depending on palliative or curative antineoplastic treatment initiation, and subsequently randomized 1:1 to either CGA with corresponding interventions or standard of care, along with standardized antineoplastic treatment. A geriatrician led CGA with corresponding interventions and clinical follow-up will be conducted within one month of antineoplastic treatment initiation. The interdisciplinary CGA will cover multiple geriatric domains and employ a standard set of validated assessment tools. Primary endpoints will be physical decline measured with the 30-s Chair-Stand-Test at three months (palliative setting) and unplanned hospital admissions at six months (curative setting). Additional outcomes include QoL, treatment toxicity and adherence, occurrence of polypharmacy, potential drug interactions, potential inappropriate medications, and survival. The primary outcomes will be analyzed using a mixed model regression analysis (30-s chair stand test) and linear regression models (unplanned hospitalizations), with an intention to treat approach. Power calculations reveal the need to enroll 134 (palliative) and 188 (curative) patients. DISCUSSION: The present study will examine whether CGA, as an additional intervention to antineoplastic treatment, can improve endpoints valued by older patients with cancer. Inclusion began November 2020 and is ongoing, with 37 and 29 patients recruited April 15th, 2021. Registration:NCT04686851.

Predictive Value of Geriatric Oncology Screening and Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Solid Cancers: Protocol for a Danish prospective cohort study (PROGNOSIS-G8).

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with cancer constitute a heterogeneous group with varying degrees of frailty; therefore, geriatric assessment with initial geriatric oncology screening is recommended. The Geriatric 8 (G8) and the modified Geriatric 8 (mG8) are promising screening tools with high accuracy and an association with survival. However, evidence is sparse regarding patient-centered outcomes. This protocol describes a study, which aims to address the predictive and prognostic value of the G8 and mG8, with quality of life (QoL) as the primary outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center prospective cohort study, patients, age ≥70 years with solid malignancies, will be screened with the G8 and mG8 prior to receiving 1st line antineoplastic treatment. Patients will contribute medical record data including; cancer type, Charlson comorbidity index score, performance status, and treatment intent, type, and dosage, at baseline. Patients will complete QoL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD-14) at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months follow-up. Two functional measurements (the 30-s chair stand test and the handgrip strength test) will be conducted at baseline to assess the added predictive and prognostic value. At 12 months follow-up, initially administered treatment and treatment adherence will be recorded and assessed with generalized linear models, while overall survival and cancer-specific survival will be assessed using survival analysis models with time-varying covariates. The relationship between frailty (G8 ≤ 14, mG8 ≥ 6) and QoL within 12 months will be examined using mixed regression models. DISCUSSION: Geriatric oncology screening may identify a subgroup of older patients with frailty, at risk of experiencing diminishing QoL and poor treatment adherence. With the proposed screening program, patients who require treatment modification and additional support to maintain their QoL may be identified. It is our hope, that these insights may facilitate the formation of national guidelines for the treatment of older patients with cancer. Registration:NCT04644874.