Adiposity, immunity, and inflammation: interrelationships in health and disease: a report from 24th Annual Harvard Nutrition Obesity Symposium, June 2023.

The rapidly evolving field of immunometabolism explores how changes in local immune environments may affect key metabolic and cellular processes, including that of adipose tissue. Importantly, these changes may contribute to low-grade systemic inflammation. In turn, chronic low-grade inflammation affecting adipose tissue may exacerbate the outcome of metabolic diseases. Novel advances in our understanding of immunometabolic processes may critically lead to interventions to reduce disease severity and progression. An important example in this regard relates to obesity, which has a multifaceted effect on immunity, activating the proinflammatory pathways such as the inflammasome and disrupting cellular homeostasis. This multifaceted effect of obesity can be investigated through study of downstream conditions using cellular and systemic investigative techniques. To further explore this field, the National Institutes of Health P30 Nutrition Obesity Research Center at Harvard, in partnership with Harvard Medical School, assembled experts to present at its 24th Annual Symposium entitled "Adiposity, Immunity, and Inflammation: Interrelationships in Health and Disease" on 7 June, 2023. This manuscript seeks to synthesize and present key findings from the symposium, highlighting new research and novel disease-specific advances in the field. Better understanding the interaction between metabolism and immunity offers promising preventative and treatment therapies for obesity-related immunometabolic diseases.

Bariatric surgery decreases the capacity of plasma from obese asthmatic subjects to augment airway epithelial cell proinflammatory cytokine production.

Obesity is a risk factor for asthma. Individuals with asthma and obesity often have poor asthma control and do not respond as well to therapies such as inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators. Weight loss improves asthma control, with a 5%-10% loss in body mass necessary and sufficient to lead to clinically relevant improvements. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the pathogenic contribution of adipocytes from obese mice to the augmented production of proinflammatory cytokines from airway epithelial cells and the salutary effects of diet-induced weight loss to decrease these consequences. However, the effects of adipocyte-derived products on airway epithelial function in human obesity remain incompletely understood. We utilized samples collected from a 12-mo longitudinal study of subjects with obesity undergoing weight loss (bariatric) surgery including controls without asthma and subjects with allergic and nonallergic obese asthma. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) samples were collected during bariatric surgery and from recruited normal weight controls without asthma undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Human bronchial epithelial (HBEC3-KT) cells were exposed to plasma or conditioned media from cultured VAT adipocytes with or without agonists. Human bronchial smooth muscle (HBSM) cells were similarly exposed to adipocyte-conditioned media. Proinflammatory cytokines were augmented in supernatants from HBEC3-KT cells exposed to plasma as compared with subsequent visits. Whereas exposure to obese adipocyte-conditioned media induced proinflammatory responses, there were no differences between groups in both HBEC3-KT and HBSM cells. These data show that bariatric surgery and subsequent weight loss beneficially change the circulating factors that augment human airway epithelial and bronchial smooth muscle cell proinflammatory responses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This longitudinal study following subjects with asthma and obesity reveals that weight loss following bariatric surgery decreases the capacity for plasma to augment proinflammatory cytokine secretion by human bronchial epithelial cells, implicating that circulating but not adipocyte-derived factors are important modulators in obese asthma.

Obesity exacerbates influenza-induced respiratory disease via the arachidonic acid-p38 MAPK pathway.

Obesity is a risk factor for severe influenza, and asthma exacerbations caused by respiratory viral infections. We investigated mechanisms that increase the severity of airway disease related to influenza in obesity using cells derived from obese and lean individuals, and in vitro and in vivo models. Primary human nasal epithelial cells (pHNECs) derived from obese compared with lean individuals developed increased inflammation and injury in response to influenza A virus (IAV). Obese mice infected with influenza developed increased airway inflammation, lung injury and elastance, but had a decreased interferon response, compared with lean mice. Lung arachidonic acid (AA) levels increased in obese mice infected with IAV; arachidonic acid increased inflammatory cytokines and injury markers in response to IAV in human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells. Obesity in mice, and AA in HBE cells, increased activation of p38 MAPK signaling following IAV infection; inhibiting this pathway attenuated inflammation, injury and tissue elastance responses, and improved survival. In summary, obesity increases disease severity in response to influenza infection through activation of the p38 MAPK pathway in response to altered arachidonic acid signaling.

Bronchodilator response does not associate with asthma control or symptom burden among patients with poorly controlled asthma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine how four different definitions of bronchodilator response (BDR) relate to asthma control and asthma symptom burden in a large population of participants with poorly controlled asthma. PROCEDURES: We examined the baseline change in FEV1 and FVC in response to albuterol among 931 participants with poorly controlled asthma pooled from three clinical trials conducted by the American Lung Association - Airways Clinical Research Centers. We defined BDR based on four definitions and analyzed the association of each with asthma control as measured by the Asthma Control Test or Asthma Control Questionnaire, and asthma symptom burden as measured by the Asthma Symptom Utility Index. MAIN FINDINGS: A BDR was seen in 31-42% of all participants, depending on the definition used. There was good agreement among responses (kappa coefficient 0.73 to 0.87), but only 56% of participants met all four definitions for BDR. A BDR was more common in men than women, in Blacks compared to Whites, in non-smokers compared to smokers, and in non-obese compared to obese participants. Among those with poorly controlled asthma, 35% had a BDR compared to 25% of those with well controlled asthma, and among those with a high symptom burden, 34% had a BDR compared to 28% of those with a low symptom burden. After adjusting for age, sex, height, race, obesity and baseline lung function, none of the four definitions was associated with asthma control or symptom burden. CONCLUSION: A BDR is not associated with asthma control or symptoms in people with poorly controlled asthma, regardless of the definition of BDR used. These findings question the clinical utility of a BDR in assessing asthma control and symptoms.

Effects of obesity, pneumoperitoneum, and body position on mechanical power of intraoperative ventilation: an observational study.

Mechanical power can describe the complex interaction between the respiratory system and the ventilator and may predict lung injury or pulmonary complications, but the power associated with injury of healthy human lungs is unknown. Body habitus and surgical conditions may alter mechanical power but the effects have not been measured. In a secondary analysis of an observational study of obesity and lung mechanics during robotic laparoscopic surgery, we comprehensively quantified the static elastic, dynamic elastic, and resistive energies comprising mechanical power of ventilation. We stratified by body mass index (BMI) and examined power at four surgical stages: level after intubation, with pneumoperitoneum, in Trendelenburg, and level after releasing the pneumoperitoneum. Esophageal manometry was used to estimate transpulmonary pressures. Mechanical power of ventilation and its bioenergetic components increased over BMI categories. Respiratory system and lung power were nearly doubled in subjects with class 3 obesity compared with lean at all stages. Power dissipated into the respiratory system was increased with class 2 or 3 obesity compared with lean. Increased power of ventilation was associated with decreasing transpulmonary pressures. Body habitus is a prime determinant of increased intraoperative mechanical power. Obesity and surgical conditions increase the energies dissipated into the respiratory system during ventilation. The observed elevations in power may be related to tidal recruitment or atelectasis, and point to specific energetic features of mechanical ventilation of patients with obesity that may be controlled with individualized ventilator settings.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Mechanical power describes the complex interaction between a patient's lungs and the ventilator and may be useful in predicting lung injury. However, its behavior in obesity and during dynamic surgical conditions is not understood. We comprehensively quantified ventilation bioenergetics and effects of body habitus and common surgical conditions. These data show body habitus is a prime determinant of intraoperative mechanical power and provide quantitative context for future translation toward a useful perioperative prognostic measurement.

Diet-induced obesity worsens allergen-induced type 2/type 17 inflammation in airways by enhancing DUOX1 activation.

More than 50% of people with asthma in the United States are obese, and obesity often worsens symptoms of allergic asthma and impairs response to treatment. Based on previously established roles of the epithelial NADPH oxidase DUOX1 in allergic airway inflammation, we addressed the potential involvement of DUOX1 in altered allergic inflammation in the context of obesity. Intranasal house dust mite (HDM) allergen challenge of subjects with allergic asthma induced rapid secretion of IL-33, then IL-13, into the nasal lumen, responses that were significantly enhanced in obese asthmatic subjects (BMI >30). Induction of diet-induced obesity (DIO) in mice by high-fat diet (HFD) feeding similarly enhanced acute airway responses to intranasal HDM challenge, particularly with respect to secretion of IL-33 and type 2/type 3 cytokines, and this was associated with enhanced epithelial DUOX1 expression and was avoided in DUOX1-deficient mice. DIO also enhanced DUOX1-dependent features of chronic HDM-induced allergic inflammation. Although DUOX1 did not affect overall weight gain by HFD feeding, it contributed to glucose intolerance, suggesting a role in glucose metabolism. However, glucose intolerance induced by short-term HFD feeding, in the absence of adiposity, was not sufficient to alter HDM-induced acute airway responses. DIO was associated with enhanced presence of the adipokine leptin in the airways, and leptin enhanced DUOX1-dependent IL-13 and mucin production in airway epithelial cells. In conclusion, augmented inflammatory airway responses to HDM in obesity are associated with increases in airway epithelial DUOX1, and by increased airway epithelial leptin signaling.

Lung de-recruitment in the allergic asthma of obesity: evidence from an anatomically based inverse model.

The increase in asthma associated with the obesity epidemic cannot simply be due to airway hyperresponsiveness from chronic lung compression because chronic lung compression is a feature of obesity in general. We therefore sought to investigate what other factors might be at play in the impaired lung function seen in obese individuals with asthma. We measured respiratory system impedance in four groups-Lean Control, Lean Allergic Asthma, Obese Control, and Obese Allergic Asthma-before and after administration of albuterol. Impedance measurements were fit with an anatomically based computational model of lung mechanics that represents the airway tree as a branching structure with a uniform degree of asymmetry and a fixed radius scaling ratio, γ, between branches of sequential order. The two model parameters that define the airway tree, γ and tracheal radius, varied only modestly between the four study groups, indicating relatively minor differences in airway caliber. In contrast, respiratory system elastance was 57, 34, 143, and 271 cmH2O/L, respectively, for the four groups, suggesting that obesity induced significant lung de-recruitment that was exacerbated by allergic asthma. In addition, when the radii of the individual branches of the airway tree were varied randomly, we found that roughly half the terminal airways had to be closed to have the model fit the data well. We conclude that de-recruitment of small airways is a particular feature of Obese Allergic Asthma, and this can be inferred from respiratory system impedance fit with an anatomically based computational model.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using a novel anatomically based computational model to interpret oscillometry measurements of impedance, we show that respiratory system elastance is increased in obesity and is increased dramatically in individuals with obese allergic asthma. A significant component of this increased elastance in obese allergic asthma appears to be due to closure of small airways rather than alveolar atelectasis, and this closure is partially mitigated by albuterol. These findings potentially point to nonpharmacological therapies in obese allergic asthma aimed at recruiting closed airways.

Peripheral Airway Dysfunction in Obesity and Obese Asthma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate physiological phenotypes of asthma in obesity. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do physiological responses during bronchoconstriction distinguish different groups of asthma in people with obesity, and also differentiate from responses simply related to obesity? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of people with obesity (31 with asthma and 22 without lung disease). Participants underwent methacholine challenge testing with measurement of spirometry and respiratory system impedance by oscillometry. RESULTS: Participants had class III obesity (BMI, 46.7 ± 6.6 kg/m2 in control subjects and 47.2 ± 8.2 kg/m2 in people with asthma). Most participants had significant changes in peripheral airway impedance in response to methacholine: in control subjects, resistance at 5 Hz measured by oscillometry increased by 45% ± 27% and area under the reactance curve (AX) by 268% ± 236% in response to 16 mg/mL methacholine; in people with asthma, resistance at 5 Hz measured by oscillometry increased by 52% ± 38% and AX by 361% ± 295% in response to provocation concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1 dose of methacholine. These responses suggest that obesity predisposes to peripheral airway reactivity. Two distinct groups of asthma emerged based on respiratory system impedance: one with lower reactance (baseline AX, 11.8; interquartile range, 9.9-23.4 cm H2O/L) and more concordant bronchoconstriction in central and peripheral airways; the other with high reactance (baseline AX, 46.7; interquartile range, 23.2-53.7 cm H2O/L) and discordant bronchoconstriction responses in central and peripheral airways. The high reactance asthma group included only women, and reported significantly more gastroesophageal reflux disease, worse chest tightness, more wheeze, and more asthma exacerbations than the low reactance group. INTERPRETATION: Peripheral airway reactivity detected by oscillometry is common in obese control subjects and obese people with asthma. There is a subgroup of obese asthma characterized by significant peripheral airway dysfunction by oscillometry out of proportion to spirometric airway dysfunction. This peripheral dysfunction represents clinically significant respiratory disease not readily assessed by spirometry.

Mitoquinone mesylate attenuates pathological features of lean and obese allergic asthma in mice.

Obesity is associated with severe, difficult-to-control asthma, and increased airway oxidative stress. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mROS) are an important source of oxidative stress in asthma, leading us to hypothesize that targeting mROS in obese allergic asthma might be an effective treatment. Using a mouse model of house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic airway disease in mice fed a low- (LFD) or high-fat diet (HFD), and the mitochondrial antioxidant MitoQuinone (MitoQ), we investigated the effects of obesity and ROS on HDM-induced airway inflammation, remodeling, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Obese allergic mice showed increased lung tissue eotaxin, airway tissue eosinophilia, and AHR compared with lean allergic mice. MitoQ reduced airway inflammation, remodeling, and hyperreactivity in both lean and obese allergic mice, and tissue eosinophilia in obese-allergic mice. Similar effects were observed with decyl triphosphonium (dTPP+), the hydrophobic cationic moiety of MitoQ lacking ubiquinone. HDM-induced oxidative sulfenylation of proteins was increased particularly in HFD mice. Although only MitoQ reduced sulfenylation of proteins involved in protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), ER stress was attenuated by both MitoQ and dTPP+ suggesting the anti-allergic effects of MitoQ are mediated in part by effects of its hydrophobic dTPP+ moiety reducing ER stress. In summary, oxidative signaling is an important mediator of allergic airway disease. MitoQ, likely through reducing protein oxidation and affecting the UPR pathway, might be effective for the treatment of asthma and specific features of obese asthma.

Roflumilast May Increase Risk of Exacerbations When Used to Treat Poorly Controlled Asthma in People with Obesity.

Rationale: People with obesity often have severe, difficult-to-control asthma. There is a need to develop better treatments for this population. One potential treatment is roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, as it is reported to have efficacy for the treatment of asthma and can promote weight loss. Objectives: To investigate the potential efficacy of roflumilast for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity. Methods: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of 24 weeks of roflumilast versus placebo for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity (body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher). The primary outcome was a change in ACT (Asthma Control Test) score. Results: Twenty-two people were randomized to roflumilast and 16 to placebo. Roflumilast had no effect on change in the ACT (increased by 2.6 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.5-4.4] in those on roflumilast vs. 2.0 [IQR, 0.7-3.3] in those on placebo). Participants assigned to roflumilast had a 3.5-fold (relative risk [RR] 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-9.4) increased risk of an episode of poor asthma control and an 8.1-fold (RR 95% CI, 1.01-65.0) increased risk of an urgent care visit for asthma. Ten participants (56%) assigned to roflumilast required a course of oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations, and none in the placebo group. Participants losing 5% or more of their body weight experienced a clinically and statistically significant improvement in asthma control (ACT increased by 4.4 [IQR, 2.5-6.3] vs. 1.5 [IQR, 0.0-3.0] in those who lost less than 5%). Conclusions: Roflumilast had no effect on asthma control. Of concern, roflumilast was associated with an increased risk of exacerbation in obese individuals with poorly controlled asthma. These results highlight the importance of studying interventions in different subpopulations of people with asthma, particularly people with obesity and asthma who may respond differently to medications than lean people with asthma. Weight loss of at least 5% was associated with improved asthma control, indicating that interventions other than roflumilast promoting weight loss may have efficacy for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03532490).

Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial of the Effects of Positive Messaging on Patient-Reported Outcomes with Asthma - Effect of Obesity.

Objective: Asthma in obese patients represents a specific phenotype that is associated with increased symptoms, more frequent and severe exacerbations, reduced responsiveness to treatment, and decreased quality of life. Marketing and placebos have been shown to alter subjective responses to interventions in both asthma and obesity. We evaluated obesity as a potential treatment effect modifier of the effects enhanced drug messaging or placebos on subjective asthma outcomes. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that studied the effect of messaging and placebos on asthma outcomes. A total of 601 participants were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to one of 5 groups: enhanced messaging with montelukast or placebo, neutral messaging with montelukast or placebo, or usual care and followed for 4 weeks after randomization. We compared baseline characteristics by obesity status for 600 participants with data on body weight. Obesity was evaluated as an effect modifier for enhanced messaging (versus neutral messaging) and on placebo effects (versus usual care) in 362 participants assigned to a placebo group or usual care for three asthma questionnaires: Asthma Control Questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Asthma Symptoms Utility Index. Results: Overall, 227 (37%) of participants were obese. Obese participants were older (mean age 41 vs 34), more likely female (82% vs 67%) and self-identified as Black (44% vs 25%) than non-obese participants. As previously published, enhanced messaging was associated with improvements in patient-reported asthma scores, but there was no evidence for a placebo effect. Obesity status did not influence the message effects nor did it modify responses to placebo. Conclusion: Obesity has been shown to be an important factor associated with asthma outcomes and an effect modifier of drug treatment effects. We conducted a post hoc, subgroup analysis of data from a multicenter randomized trial of enhanced messaging and placebo associated with drug treatment on asthma outcomes. Our findings suggest that observed differences in treatment effects between obese and non-obese patients sometimes seen in trials of asthma treatments are unlikely to be due to different "placebo" effects of treatment and may reflect differential physiologic effects of active agents.

Microbiome, Metabolism, and Immunoregulation of Asthma: An American Thoracic Society and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Workshop Report.

This report presents the proceedings from a workshop titled "Microbiome, Metabolism and Immunoregulation of Asthma" that was held virtually May 13 and 14, 2021. The workshop was jointly sponsored by the American Thoracic Society (Assembly on Allergy, Immunology, and Inflammation) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. It convened an interdisciplinary group of experts with backgrounds in asthma immunology, microbiome science, metabolomics, computational biology, and translational pulmonary research. The main purpose was to identify key scientific gaps and needs to further advance research on microbial and metabolic mechanisms that may contribute to variable immune responses and disease heterogeneity in asthma. Discussions were structured around several topics, including 1) immune and microbial mechanisms of asthma pathogenesis in murine models, 2) the role of microbes in pediatric asthma exacerbations, 3) dysregulated metabolic pathways in asthma associated with obesity, 4) metabolism effects on macrophage function in adipose tissue and the lungs, 5) computational approaches to dissect microbiome-metabolite links, and 6) potential confounders of microbiome-disease associations in human studies. This report summarizes the major points of discussion, which included identification of specific knowledge gaps, challenges, and suggested directions for future research. These include questions surrounding mechanisms by which microbiota and metabolites shape host health versus an allergic or asthmatic state; direct and indirect influences of other biological factors, exposures, and comorbidities on these interactions; and ongoing technical and analytical gaps for clinical translation.

An Online Weight Loss Intervention for People With Obesity and Poorly Controlled Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss might improve asthma control in people with obesity. However, people with asthma might have particular challenges losing weight and the amount of weight loss needed to improve asthma control is not clear. OBJECTIVES: To pilot-test an online weight loss intervention and to estimate the impact of weight loss on asthma control. METHODS: We performed a 6-month, single-arm, futility trial of an online weight loss intervention at 2 centers. To reject the assumption of futility, 9 or more participants had to lose at least 5% of their body weight. We also assessed the association between weight loss (≥5%) and asthma outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-three participants (85% women) started the weight loss intervention. The median and interquartile range for the body mass index was 40.3 kg/m2 (range 34.7-46.8 kg/m2), and 14 (range 12-17 kg/m2) for the Asthma Control Test score. At 6 months, 10 participants (23%; 95% CI 12%-39%) lost at least 5% of their initial weight. Weight loss of at least 5% was associated with a clinically and statistically significant improvements in their Asthma Control Test (median [interquartile range] increase of 3 [1 to 7]; P < .05), Marks Asthma Quality of Life Score (-9.5 [-18 to -3]; P = .008), and their general health-related quality of life score (RAND-36; improved by 9.4 [2.8 to 22.5]; P =.014). CONCLUSIONS: An online weight loss intervention has the potential to meet U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance for product evaluation (at least a 5% weight loss in 35% of people) for treating obesity, and is associated with a clinically significant improvement in asthma control, quality of life, and overall health-related quality of life.

Impact of body mass index on omalizumab response in adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of asthma treatment, including biologics, may be different in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate response to omalizumab (dosed by serum immunoglobulin E level and weight) by BMI category. METHODS: Pooled data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma were analyzed by BMI category (<25 kg/m2 [normal or underweight], n = 397; 25 to <30 kg/m2 [overweight], n = 330; ≥ 30 kg/m2 [obese], n = 268). Placebo-adjusted exacerbation rate reductions were evaluated by Poisson regression modeling. Changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) dose, Total Asthma Symptom Score, and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire were evaluated by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Greater placebo-adjusted exacerbation rate reductions (95% confidence interval) were observed with increasing BMI (normal or underweight, -37.4% [-69.0% to 26.8%]; overweight, -52.7% [-78.4% to 3.7%]; obese, -71.9% [-86.9% to -39.5%]). There were no differences in forced expiratory volume in 1 second improvement between BMI categories at week 16 (normal or underweight, 76.2 [5.3-147.1] mL; overweight, 98.1 [13.9-182.4] mL; obese, 69.1 [-18.9 to 157.2] mL). No differences in BDP dose reduction (µg) were noted between BMI categories (normal or underweight, 23.0 [15.7-30.3]; overweight, 22.5 [13.5-31.5]; obese, 16.6 [5.8-27.3]). Fewer patients in the higher BMI categories eliminated BDP use. There were trends for smaller improvements with higher BMI in Total Asthma Symptom Score (normal/underweight, -0.52 [-0.82 to -0.22]; overweight, -0.50 [-0.80 to -0.20]; obese, -0.39 [-0.77 to 0.00]) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (normal or underweight, 0.34 [0.16-0.52]; overweight, 0.34 [0.13-0.55]; obese, 0.15 [-0.08 to 0.39]). CONCLUSION: Omalizumab provides benefit to patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, regardless of BMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Studies 008/009 were conducted before clinical trial registration was required, and therefore clinical trial registration numbers are not available.

Obesity and Asthma.

Obesity is a major risk factor for the development of asthma, and the prevalence of obesity is higher in people with asthma than in the general population. Obese people often have severe asthma-recent studies in the United States suggest that 60% of adults with severe asthma are obese. Multiple mechanisms link obesity and asthma, which are discussed in this article, and these pathways contribute to different phenotypes of asthma among people with obesity. From a practical aspect, changes in physiology and immune markers affect diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity in people with asthma and obesity. Obesity also affects response to asthma medications and is associated with an increased risk of co-morbidities such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, depression, and obstructive sleep apnea, all of which may affect asthma control. Obese people may be at elevated risk of exacerbations related to increased risk of severe disease in response to viral infections. Interventions that target improved dietary quality, exercise, and weight loss are likely to be particularly helpful for this patient population.

The challenge of addressing obesity in people with poorly controlled asthma.

OBJECTIVE: There is a high prevalence of obesity in people with asthma, and obesity is associated with poorly controlled asthma. Significant weight loss might improve asthma control: the purpose of this study was to investigate patient characteristics and factors that might affect implementation of a weight loss and/or roflumilast intervention, to target both obesity and asthma. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of people with obesity and poorly controlled asthma performed at 13 sites across the United States. RESULTS: One hundred and two people participated in this study. Median BMI was 37 (IQR 35-42). The majority, 55%, were African American and 76% were female. Fifty two percent had very poorly controlled asthma. Most participants were quite sedentary (70% reported being inactive or participating only in light-intensity activities according to the Stanford Brief Activity Survey). Participants reported significant impairments related to physical function on the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite questionnaire (median score 67 [IQR 41-84]). Thirty-five percent of participants reported mild, and 2 % moderate, depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. CONCLUSIONS: Poorly controlled asthma and obesity often affect minority populations and are associated with significant impairments in health related to physical function and low levels of physical activity that might complicate efforts to lose weight. Interventions targeted at poorly controlled asthma associated with obesity in the United States need to address factors complicating health in underserved communities, such as increasing opportunities for physical activity, while also managing activity limitations related to the combination of asthma and obesity.