Referral patterns for undescended testis: A 7 year comparative analysis of primary care providers.

INTRODUCTION: Cryptorchidism, or undescended testis (UDT), is identified in 1% of boys by one year of age and carries long term risks of infertility and testicular neoplasia. In 2014, the American Urological Association (AUA) released a guideline statement stating that patients with UDT should be referred to a urologist by 6 months of age in order to facilitate timely surgical correction. This study is the follow-up to a 2010 study assessing referral patterns to our university center from primary care providers. OBJECTIVE: In this new study, we aim to identify changes in referral patterns in response to the establishment of the 2014 AUA guidelines and to understand how our referring physicians stay abreast of current knowledge regarding UDT. STUDY DESIGN: A 9 question anonymous survey regarding UDT referral patterns was sent to providers who had previously referred a patient to our pediatric urology practice. The results were categorized by specialty and were compared to the similar survey from 2010. RESULTS: Surveys were sent to 500 physicians with 138 (27.6%) responses received. Less than half of respondents reported that they would refer a boy with unilateral or bilateral palpable UDT by 6 months of age (37.0% and 38.4% respectively). This was not significantly different than the 2010 survey (p = 0.68 and 0.27 respectively). Two-thirds of physicians would refer a patient with unilateral nonpalpable UDT within the recommended time frame (68.8%); this was also unchanged from 2010 (p = 0.87). There was an improvement in respondents who would refer immediately for bilateral nonpalpable testes from 49.8% in 2010 to 53.6% in 2017 (p = 0.01). Residency training was most commonly cited as the primary source of knowledge regarding UDT although 89.3% of respondents citing this were >5 years removed from residency training. DISCUSSION: Delayed referral patterns were reported by the majority of providers for palpable UDT and by greater than one-third of providers for nonpalpable UDT. There was minimal change in referral patterns between 2010 and 2017 despite the release of the AUA cryptorchidism guidelines in 2014. In both 2010 and 2017, residency training was identified as the primary source of knowledge regarding management of UDT. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest an unmet need for education regarding contemporary management of UDT for the primary care physicians in our community.

Guideline developers in the United States were inconsistent in applying criteria for appropriate Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation use.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether guidelines published by organizations based in the United States comply with published criteria for the use of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We performed a cross-sectional study of all clinical practice guidelines that indicated the use of the GRADE approach, were published between 2011 and 2018, and listed in the National Guidelines Clearinghouse. RESULTS: We included 67 guideline documents from 44 of 135 (32.6%) US-based organizations that indicated the use of the GRADE approach. The majority (60/67, 89.6%) of guidelines defined the certainty of evidence consistent with GRADE, but only approximately 1 in 10 (7/67, 10.4%) explicitly reported consideration of all eight criteria to assess the certainty in the evidence for rating down and up. A majority of guidelines (36/67, 53.7%) provided a summary of the evidence, described explicit consideration of all four central domains (36/67, 53.7%), and rated the strength of recommendation consistent with GRADE (36/67, 53.7%). CONCLUSION: Approximately one in three US-based organizations developing evidence-based guidelines report the use of GRADE, but adherence to published criteria is inconsistent. As uptake of the GRADE approach increases in the United States, continued efforts to train guideline methodologists and panel members are important.

Retroperitoneal Actinomycosis: A Rare Sequela of an Infected Obstructing Ureteral Stone.

Background: Actinomycosis is a condition in which Actinomyces, a normal component of the oral and gastrointenstial flora, becomes pathogenic in the setting of damaged tissue, leading to widespread tissue destruction across fascial planes. Prior literature describing this condition is rare, particularly cases involving the retroperitoneum. In this study, we report a case of retroperitoneal actinomycosis caused by an infected, obstructing ureteral stone. Case Presentation: A 48-year-old woman with a history of substance abuse, malnutrition, and gastric bypass presented to the emergency room with a 3-week history of abdominal pain and fevers. Workup revealed a 9 mm obstructing right ureteral stone with associated perinephric fluid collection that was concerning for forniceal rupture. There was left hydronephrosis and a 3 mm lower pole renal calculus as well. The patient underwent emergent decompression where bilateral duplicated collecting systems were identified, requiring stenting of all four moieties to ensure maximal decompression in the setting of obstructive pyelonephritis. Urine cultures grew Escherichia coli and Candida. The patient continued to deteriorate despite culture appropriate antibiotic therapy; repeat scan revealed progression of her perinephric fluid collection into a loculated retroperitoneal abscess. A percutaneous drain was placed, and nearly half a liter of pus was evacuated. Fluid cultures grew Actinomyces, and she ultimately recovered after a prolonged course of antibiotics, including 1 month of intravenous therapy and an additional 6 months of oral treatment. All stones were ultimately removed via ureteroscopy. Conclusion: Actinomycosis is a rare invasive infection that is caused when the Actinomyces bacteria colonizes damaged tissue. We present the first reported case of urolithiasis inciting this process via tissue damage caused by obstruction and infection. Although rare, heightened suspicion is warranted among immunocompromised hosts who do not improve after decompression in such scenarios.