Is interventional technique better than the traditional over-the-wire method for left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Background: Interventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (I-CRT) for left ventricular lead (LVL) placement works as a supplement to traditional (over-the-wire) cardiac resynchronization therapy (T-CRT). It has been argued that I-CRT is a time-consuming and complicated procedure. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in procedure-related, perioperative, postoperative, and clinical endpoints between I-CRT and T-CRT. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included all consecutive patients receiving a CRT-pacemaker/defibrillator between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2018. Patients underwent T-CRT from January 1, 2012, to June 1, 2015, and I-CRT from January 1, 2016, to August 31, 2018. We obtained data from patient record files, fluoroscopic images, and the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum/linear regression for continuous variables and the Pearson χ2/Fisher exact for categorical variables. Results: Optimal LVL placement was achieved in 82.7% of the I-CRT group and 76.8% of the T-CRT group (P = .015). In the I-CRT group, 99.0% of LVLs were quadripolar vs 55.3% in the T-CRT group (P <.001). Two or more leads were used during the procedure in 0.7% and 10.5% of all cases in the I-CRT and T-CRT groups, respectively (P <.001). Total implantation time was 81.0 minutes in the I-CRT group and 83.0 minutes in the T-CRT group (P = .41). Time with catheters in the coronary sinus was 45.0 minutes for the I-CRT group vs 37.0 minutes in the T-CRT group, respectively (P <.001). Conclusion: I-CRT did not prolong total implantation time despite longer time with catheters in the coronary sinus. I-CRT allowed more optimal LVL placement, wider use of quadripolar leads, and use of fewer leads during the procedure.

Validation of the national Danish ablation database: a retrospective, registry-based validation study.

Aim.To validate the National Danish Ablation Database (NDAD) by investigating to what extent data in NDAD correspond to medical records.Type of study. Non-blinded, registry-based, retrospective, validation study. Material and methods. A sample of patients who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation in Denmark between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 were included. By utilizing medical records as gold standard, positive predictive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for NDAD were assessed and presented as five main categories: arrhythmia characteristics, demographics, cardiac history, complications, and medication. PPV's and NPV's exceeding 90% were considered as high agreement. Results. 597 patients (71.0% males) were included in the study. Median age was 63.1 (IQR: 54.9-68.4) years. The median PPV and NPV estimates across all variables were respectively 90.4% (95% CI: 68%-95.2%) (PPV) and 99.4% (95% CI: 98.4%-99.8%) (NPV) at baseline, and 91.7% (95% CI: 67.4%-95.4%) (PPV) and 99.3% (98.2%-99.3%) (NPV) at follow-up. Conclusion. The data registered in NDAD agrees to a great extent with the patients' medical records, suggesting NDAD is a database with high validity. As a result of low complication rate, the PPV- and NPV-estimates among complication variables were prone to somewhat greater uncertainty compared to the rest.

Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation and risk of stroke and death after ablation for typical atrial flutter: A nation-wide Danish cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is indicated for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 for men and ≥3 for women. This is regardless of successful catheter ablation for their arrhythmia. Studies have mainly focused on AF, and little is known regarding use of OAC in AFL patients following catheter ablation. PURPOSE: To describe discontinuation of OAC in a national cohort of patients who have undergone first-time cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) for AFL. METHODS: We identified patients undergoing first-time CTIA during the period 2010-2016 using the Danish National Ablation Registry. Information on comorbidities and OAC use were gathered using the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients were followed until March 1st, 2018. RESULTS: We identified 2409 consecutive patients. Median age was 66 (IQR 58-72) years, and 1952 (81%) were men. During mean follow-up of 4 ± 1.7 years, 723 (30%) patients discontinued OAC. Patients discontinuing OAC were younger, had less comorbidity, and a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score. During follow-up, 252 (10%) patients died, and 112 (5%) patients had a stroke. Incidence of both these events increased with increasing age and CHA2DS2-VASc score. In adjusted analysis, we observed higher mortality (p < 0.0001) in patients discontinuing OAC, while stroke rate was not significantly higher (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION: In this national cohort of patients who have undergone first-time CTIA, patients discontinuing OAC treatment were younger and had less comorbidities. Patients remain at elevated risk of death and stroke/TIA, increasing with their age and CHA2DS2-VASc score.

Recurrent atrial flutter ablation and incidence of atrial fibrillation ablation after first-time ablation for typical atrial flutter: A nation-wide Danish cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cavo tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) is considered an effective first-line treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFL). However, many patients develop atrial fibrillation (AF) after successful CTIA. Knowledge about recurrent arrhythmia after CTIA mainly comes from small cohort studies with limited follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To describe incidences of re-ablation for AFL and ablation for AF after first-time CTIA in a nation-wide cohort. METHODS: In the Danish National Ablation Registry we identified patients undergoing first-time CTIA during 2010-2016. Subsequent CTIA and AF-ablation procedures were identified until March 1st, 2018. We collected information on patient comorbidities in the Danish National Patient Registry. RESULTS: We identified 2409 patients undergoing first-time CTIA. Median age was 66 (IQR 58-72) years, 1952 (81%) were men, and 78 (3%) patients had a history of previous ablation for AF. Acute procedural success was achieved in 2288 (95%) patients. During mean follow-up of 4.0 ±â€¯1.7 years, 242 (10%) patients underwent CTI re-ablation and 326 (13.5%) underwent ablation for AF. Baseline characteristics associated with CTI re-ablation included prolonged procedural time, unsuccessful index CTIA, age <75 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score <2. Hypertension, history of AF-ablation, age <65 years use of a contact force sensing catheter and CHA2DS2-VASc score <2 were associated with later ablation for AF. CONCLUSION: In a nation-wide cohort undergoing first-time CTIA for AFL, 10% of patients underwent CTI re-ablation and 13.5% ablation for AF during mean follow-up of 4.0 ±â€¯1.7 years. Probability of a second procedure was higher in younger patients with less comorbidities.