Rituximab in the Management of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: A Treatment-Resistant Case Series from a Single Central European Referral Center.

Background and Objectives: Rituximab (RTX) has been the predominant treatment for autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs). The objective of this research was to assess the advantages and safety characteristics of RTX treatment in individuals with AIBD. This assessment focused on clinical remission and a reduction in glucocorticosteroid usage, its effect on the titers of autoantibodies targeting desmoglein-1 (DSG-1) and desmoglein-3 (DSG-3), and adverse occurrences during a 12-month follow-up period in a dermatology department within a Central European university context. Materials and Methods: Our case series involved eleven patients, including eight patients with pemphigus vulgaris, two with pemphigus foliaceus, and one with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. They received a 1 g dose of rituximab, repeated over a two-week interval. Results: The reduction in a prednisone-equivalent dosage after 2, 6, and 12 months following the second RTX infusion was 65.05%, 73.99%, and 76.93%, in that order. The titers of antibodies against DSG-1 exhibited reductions of 43.29%, 75.86%, and 54.02% at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. By contrast, the antibody concentrations targeting DSG-3 displayed a decrease of 27.88%, 14.48%, and 5.09% at the corresponding time points. Over the course of the 12-month monitoring period, 18.18% of patients experienced disease relapse, while the remaining individuals achieved either complete or partial remission with minimal or no therapy. Adverse effects were noted in 36.36% of the patient population; they were mild, and no serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: RTX represents an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic option for the management of AIBD and merits consideration in cases of refractory AIBD. However, further research is imperative to delineate the most optimal dosage, dosing frequency, and total quantity of maintenance infusions required. Additionally, there is a compelling need for studies that explore the impact of RTX on individuals with AIBD who do not exhibit a significant reduction in anti-desmoglein autoantibody levels.

Involvement of palms and soles in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases: a comparative analysis of a diagnostically relevant localization.

Introduction: The involvement of palms and soles is variable among disease entities belonging to autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD). We present our own clinical-laboratory experience concerning presentations of skin lesions on palms and soles in the pemphigus diseases group, pemphigoid diseases group, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), and lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) and discuss the pertinent literature. Methods: Lesions on palms and soles were assessed retrospectively on the basis of just photographic archives from the beginning of 2014 to March 2023. We comparatively evaluated 462 Slavic patients with AIBD. Results: Palmoplantar involvement was observed in only 21 patients with AIBD (12 females and 9 males). There was no statistically significant difference between palmoplantar involvement in the pemphigus diseases group compared to the pemphigoid diseases group and no statistically significant difference between the pemphigus diseases group compared to the subepithelial AIBD. Discussion: Nevertheless, particularly in LPP and EBA, and occasionally in pemphigus diseases and pemphigoid diseases groups of AIBD, localization on palms and soles may be diagnostically important at the clinical level.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: A Case Series from a Central European Referral Center.

Background and Objectives: Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) may be treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusions. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits and safety profiles of high-dose IVIG therapy in AIBD patients, as determined by clinical remission, the glucocorticosteroid-sparing effect, and adverse events at 12 months follow-up in a Central European university dermatology department setting. Materials and Methods: Our case series included 10 patients: five patients with pemphigus vulgaris, one with pemphigus herpetiformis, one with pemphigus foliaceus, one with bullous pemphigoid, two with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. They underwent 4-12 monthly cycles of IVIG therapy at a dose of 2 g/kg per cycle. Results: The prednisone dosage reduction after 2, 6, and 12 months following the final IVIG course was 65.45%, 70.91%, and 76.37%, respectively. During the 12-month observation period, disease relapse was observed in 20% of patients, while others achieved complete or partial remission without or with minimal therapy. Side effects were seen in 80% of patients; they were transient and did not necessitate discontinuation of IVIG. Conclusions: IVIG demonstrates effectiveness as a treatment with a favorable safety profile. Nevertheless, its high cost remains a significant drawback, particularly in low-income countries. IVIG should be considered, especially in patients opposed to standard therapies or with contraindications to their use.

Treatment-naïve pemphigus patients showing IgG tissue deposits have serum IgG antibodies against desmoglein 1 detected more often than those against desmoglein 3: a monocentre laboratory experience.

Introduction: Pemphigus is a heterogeneous group of autoimmune acantholytic diseases. Aim: To check whether there is a relationship between detecting IgG deposits in the direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and finding IgG antibodies against particular desmoglein (DSG) isoforms in ELISA techniques in patients with pemphigus. Material and methods: Single-step DIF for revealing the deposits of IgA, IgM, IgG, IgG1, IgG4 and C3, and monoanalyte ELISAs or the multiplex ELISA were used for diagnosis. The Z test for two independent proportions was used for the statistical analysis. Results: We evaluated 19 consecutive treatment-naïve pemphigus patients, who exhibited IgG deposits, accompanied by other types of immunoreactants in various combinations, in DIF. Serum IgG antibodies against DSG1 were detected in 18 patients, whereas serum IgG antibodies against DSG3 were found in 10 patients. The statistical analysis showed that the proportion of anti-DSG1 antibody-positive individuals (18 of 19, 94.74%) was statistically significantly higher than the proportion of anti-DSG3 antibody-positive ones (10 of 19, 52.63%) (p = 0.0099). Conclusions: IgG deposition in the pemphigus pattern seems to be related to the presence of serum IgG antibodies against DSG1 rather than against DSG3. DSG1 may bind IgG more efficiently than DSG3 since DSG1 has a longer cytoplasmic region compared to that of DSG3.

S2k guidelines on the management of paraneoplastic pemphigus/paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP), also called paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome (PAMS), is a rare autoimmune disease with mucocutaneous and multi-organ involvement. PNP/PAMS is typically associated with lymphoproliferative or haematological malignancies, and less frequently with solid malignancies. The mortality rate of PNP/PAMS is elevated owing to the increased risk of severe infections and disease-associated complications, such as bronchiolitis obliterans. OBJECTIVES: These guidelines summarize evidence-based and expert-based recommendations (S2k level) for the clinical characterization, diagnosis and management of PNP/PAMS. They have been initiated by the Task Force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology with the contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines. The degree of consent among all task force members was included. RESULTS: Chronic severe mucositis and polymorphic skin lesions are clue clinical characteristics of PNP/PAMS. A complete assessment of the patient with suspected PNP/PAMS, requiring histopathological study and immunopathological investigations, including direct and indirect immunofluorescence, ELISA and, where available, immunoblotting/immunoprecipitation, is recommended to achieve a diagnosis of PNP/PAMS. Detection of anti-envoplakin antibodies and/or circulating antibodies binding to the rat bladder epithelium at indirect immunofluorescence is the most specific tool for the diagnosis of PNP/PAMS in a patient with compatible clinical and anamnestic features. Treatment of PNP/PAMS is highly challenging. Systemic steroids up to 1.5 mg/kg/day are recommended as first-line option. Rituximab is also recommended in patients with PNP/PAMS secondary to lymphoproliferative conditions but might also be considered in cases of PNP/PAMS associated with solid tumours. A multidisciplinary approach involving pneumologists, ophthalmologists and onco-haematologists is recommended for optimal management of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PNP/PAMS. Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic recommendations will require further validation by prospective studies.

Clinical significance of umbilical region involvement in pemphigus vulgaris in a series of 81 ethnic Poles: a comparative analysis of the distribution of lesions in two infrequent locations.

Introduction: Autoimmune bullous diseases are potentially life-threatening dermatoses which present with cutaneous and/or mucosal blisters, diagnosed on the basis of clinical manifestations, direct immunofluorescence of perilesional tissue, and serum testing for circulating autoantibodies. Sometimes, lesions in the navel can lead to the diagnosis of a bullous disease. Aim: To assess the frequency of occurrence of pemphigus lesions located in the navel area and nail apparatus in pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in ethnic Poles. Material and methods: Eighty one patients (31 males and 50 females, mean age 59 years) with dermatoses of the PV group diagnosed in 2002-2020 were retrospectively analysed using their photographic files. Statistical analysis was performed using the difference test between two proportions to check the difference between the percentage of PV patients with navel area involvement and nail apparatus involvement. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between PV patients with nail apparatus involvement (12.3%) and navel area involvement (14.8%) (p = 0.4632). Only females had lesions in the navel area in our series of PV patients. Conclusions: It is speculated that the causal relationship may exist between the female reproductive system and the pattern of expression of PV lesions around the umbilicus. The awareness that PV can infrequently affect the umbilical region and the nail apparatus should help in some cases to establish the diagnosis of PV. The periumbilical involvement can facilitate the performance of DIF in individuals with lesions in less accessible areas.

Sacral Dimple, Conjunctiva, and Nipple as Less Obvious Pemphigus Vulgaris Locations around Natural Body Orifices: A Report of Three Cases.

In this paper, we present our own clinical-laboratory experience concerning three less obvious presentations of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and discuss the pertinent literature. The involvement of the sacral dimple reported here for the first time, as well as the nipple and the eyes, could initially be misleading clinically. These less stereotypical localizations may occur due to the transition of different epithelia, each with varying levels of cadherin (desmoglein, desmocollin) and thus altered sensitivity to mechanical stress. The role of dermatologists who have experience in treating autoimmune blistering dermatoses is fundamental for identifying promptly the initial and exacerbating PV lesions in such unusual locations.

A Probing of the Issue of Detecting IgG, IgG4 and IgA Antibodies to Laminin 332 Epitopes in Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: A Clinical-Laboratory Experience of a Single Central European University Dermatology Department.

Purpose: Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a very rare autoimmune bullous disease, affecting predominantly the mucosae and characterized by autoantibodies to the epithelial basement membrane components. Laminin 332 (Ln-332) is one of the most probable antigens with association with malignancy. The laboratory diagnosis of Ln-332-mediated autoimmunity is troublesome. The aim here was to comparatively examine IgG, IgG4, and IgA autoantibodies specific to α3, ß3 or γ2 subunits of Ln-322 in MMP patients using the BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence technique (IIF). Patients and Methods: Sera from 15 MMP patients were studied. BIOCHIP mosaic-based Ln-332 IIF, direct immunofluorescence, ELISA tests for anti-BP180/BP20 IgG antibodies and statistical analyses were performed. Results: Of all the 15 sera examined for IgG4 antibodies, only 1 (6.67%) reacted with the α3 chain, 0 with the ß3 chain, and 0 with the γ2 chain. No positive reactivity was seen with the IgG and IgA antibodies. BIOCHIP mosaic-based IIF with Ln-332 showed 100% sensitivity, 8% specificity, 21% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value in relation to the diagnostic gold standard of DIF. The concomitant malignancies were revealed in three cases. Conclusion: The detection of antibodies to Ln-332 chains is occasional in Polish MMP sufferers. Still, the evaluation of IgG4 antibodies in MMP can reduce the false-negative results.

Issues occupying our minds: Nomenclature of autoimmune blistering diseases requires updating, pemphigus vulgaris propensity to affect areas adjacent to natural body orifices unifies seemingly diverse clinical features of this disease.

In this conceptual analysis, we present our concepts on two issues regarding autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD), namely (i) current nomenclature of AIBD requires updating by incorporating molecular data and (ii) pemphigus vulgaris (PV) "likes" areas adjacent to natural body orifices. The problem of inadequacy of the currently used nomenclature was noticed recently by Zillikens, who proposed to form a group with the task of updating it. The early efforts by Dmochowski to update this nomenclature happened to be a daunting task. Nevertheless, the ideal nomenclature should retain the bulk of clinical data, which generations of dermatologists are accustomed to, including triggers if known, and incorporate molecular data revealing targets of autoimmune response and immunoglobulin isotypes involved. The natural body orifices affected by PV were previously described in numerous publications. However, these openings are described separately in these publications. Here, Dmochowski comes up with an intellectual concept that this propensity of PV unifies seemingly diverse clinical features of this disease.

Case Report: Infantile Bullous Pemphigoid: Triggering by COVID-19 Is Speculative.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a cutaneous disease triggered by numerous stimuli, where genetic milieu-influenced autoimmunity to hemidesmosomal proteins, namely, BP180 and/or BP230 initiate an inflammation leading to dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) enzymatic pathological remodelling. Here, to the best of our knowledge, we present the first case of an infantile BP apparently triggered by COVID-19. BP should be included in differential diagnosis of infantile rashes showing blisters or vesicles or both as well as their prodromal and evolutionary lesions. Possible triggers, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), of BP in infancy should be identified and properly dealt with.

Conceptualization and validation of an innovative direct immunofluorescence technique utilizing fluorescein conjugate against IgG + IgG4 for routinely diagnosing autoimmune bullous dermatoses.

INTRODUCTION: Autoimmune bullous diseases (ABDs) are potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous illnesses that require diagnosis with direct immunofluorescence (DIF). In this study we compared the diagnostic accuracy of traditional DIF (DIFt; separate immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgG1, IgG4, IgA, IgM and C3 deposits detection) and modified DIF (DIFm; simultaneous IgG + IgG4 deposits detection instead of separate IgG and IgG4 deposits detection) in routine diagnostics of ABDs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with ABDs (7 with pemphigus dermatoses and 11 with subepithelial ABDs) were evaluated with DIFt and DIFm. RESULTS: The agreement of detectability of IgG immunoreactants was obtained in 16 ABD cases (88.89%), as positive results in both DIFt and DIFm were obtained in 13 cases and negative results in both DIFt and DIFm were obtained in 3 cases. One ABD case (Brunsting-Perry pemphigoid) (5.56%) was negative in DIFm with a positive DIFt result (IgG1 deposits). One ABD case (bullous pemphigoid) (5.56%) had only C3 deposits in DIFt with a positive DIFm reading (IgG + IgG4 deposits). A statistically significant relationship (p = 0.0186) between DIFm and DIFt results was revealed using Fisher's exact test. CONCLUSIONS: Both DIFt and DIFm are useful methods to detect deposition of IgG immunoreactants, but it seems that the innovative DIFm method slightly increases the detectability of IgG/IgG4 immunoreactants in relation to DIFt. The introduction of DIFm into routine laboratory diagnostics of ABDs seems to be justified, as it enables the abandonment of separate FITC conjugates for IgG and IgG4, which is important for cost-effectiveness.

A comparative analysis of tuberculosis in vitro screening in pemphigus patients selected for treatment with rituximab.

INTRODUCTION: Patients qualified for the Polish government programme of treating severe pemphigus diseases with rituximab (RTX) available in 2018-2019 had to meet numerous criteria, including no active infectious disease. AIM: The clinical usefulness of tuberculosis screening with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) in native pemphigus patients selected for RTX treatment was statistically evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen pemphigus patients were examined with QFT-Plus prior to the intended RTX therapy. Ninety hospital employees examined with QFT-Plus due to contact with a cleaning worker who was diagnosed with active pulmonary tuberculosis were the control group. RESULTS: Six of 18 pemphigus patients had a positive QFT-Plus test result, one indefinite result and one initially indefinite and then negative. In the control group, 26 of 90 employees had a positive test result and none had an indefinite result. Statistical analysis by Fisher's exact test showed no statistically significant difference in QFT-Plus positive results between the groups (p = 0.5577). Only in 1 patient with recurrent mucocutaneous pemphigus vulgaris previously treated with traditional immunosuppression, lung changes were detected by computed tomography. No employee had any changes in the chest radiograph. CONCLUSIONS: Prior immunosuppression and autoimmunity might be the cause of indefinite test results, but they do not seem to increase positive results. In the native population, the QFT-Plus screening reveals a significant population exposure to M. tuberculosis infection independent of pemphigus autoimmunity, and such screening can be a starting point for identifying patients requiring anti-tuberculosis drug prophylaxis before combined RTX-glucocorticosteroid treatment.

Evaluation of a Bi-Analyte Immunoblot as a Useful Tool for Diagnosing Dermatitis Herpetiformis.

Immune responses to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and nonapeptides of gliadin (npG) are associated with dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), a gluten-related dermatosis. Recently, a bi-analyte immunoblot (b-aIB) was introduced to detect IgA antibodies in response to tTG and npG. We compared the utility of ELISA and b-aIB with tTG in serological diagnoses of DH and their agreement with direct immunofluorescence (DIF). In total, 55 sera (27 DIF-positive DH patients, 4 DIF-negative DH patients and 24 healthy controls) were examined. ELISA for anti-tTG IgA, b-aIB for anti-npG and anti-tTG IgA, and statistical analysis were performed. The b-aIB with tTG showed 78% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 82% negative predictive value in relation to ELISA. A better rate of agreement (Cohen's kappa values) in IgA detection was observed in the pair tTG ELISA and b-aIB with npG (0.85) than in pairs tTG ELISA and b-aIB with tTG (0.78) or b-aIB with tTG and b-aIB with npG (0.78). No degree of agreement was found between serological tests and DIF. Both serological tests may be used to detect the anti-tTG IgA in DH patients. Still, DH diagnosing requires careful consideration of clinical data as well as results of tissue imaging (crucial DIF) and immunoserological techniques detecting DH-type features.

A Comparative Analysis of CD32A and CD16A Polymorphisms in Relation to Autoimmune Responses in Pemphigus Diseases and Subepithelial Autoimmune Blistering Disorders.

Autoimmune blistering dermatoses (ABDs) are characterized by autoantibodies to keratinocyte surface antigens and molecules within the dermal-epidermal junction causing disruption of skin integrity. The affinity of Fc receptors (FcRs) causing an autoimmune response in ABDs may vary based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FcRs determining the course of disease. This study aimed to explore the effects of CD16A and CD32A SNPs on the autoimmune response in several ABDs. In total, 61 ABDs patients were investigated. ELISA tests, direct immunofluorescence (DIF), TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays, and statistical analyses were performed. The CA genotype (composed of allele C and A) of rs396991 in CD16A had a higher affinity for tissue-bound IgG1 in pemphigus and for C3 in subepithelial ABDs, showing statistical significance. The greatest relative risk (odds ratio) was reported for AA (rs396991 of CD16A) and CC (rs1801274 of CD32A) homozygotes. There were no statistically significant differences between certain genotypes and specific circulating autoantibodies (anti-DSG1, anti-DSG3 IgG in pemphigus; anti-BP180, anti-BP230 IgG) in subepithelial ABDs. Our findings indicated that rs396991 in CD16A may be of greater importance in ABDs development. Moreover, FcR polymorphisms appeared to have a greater impact on tissue-bound antibodies detected using DIF than circulating serum antibodies in ABDs.

Multicenter prospective study on multivariant diagnostics of autoimmune bullous dermatoses using the BIOCHIP technology.

BACKGROUND: The current standard in the serologic diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) is a multistep procedure sequentially applying different assays. In contrast, the BIOCHIP Mosaic technology combines multiple substrates for parallel analysis by indirect immunofluorescence. METHODS: Sera from 749 consecutive, prospectively recruited patients with direct immunofluorescence-positive AIBD from 13 international study centers were analyzed independently and blinded by using (1) a BIOCHIP Mosaic including primate esophagus, salt-split skin, rat bladder, monkey liver, monkey liver with serosa, recombinant BP180 NC16A, and gliadin GAF3X, as well as HEK293 cells expressing recombinant desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, type VII collagen, and BP230 C-terminus and (2) the conventional multistep approach of the Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck. RESULTS: In 731 of 749 sera (97.6%), specific autoantibodies could be detected with the BIOCHIP Mosaic, similar to the conventional procedure (725 cases, 96.8%). The Cohen κ for both serologic approaches ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. In 6.5% of sera, differences between the 2 approaches occurred and were mainly attributed to autoantigen fragments not present on the BIOCHIP Mosaic. LIMITATIONS: Laminin 332 and laminin γ1 are not represented on the BIOCHIP Mosaic. CONCLUSIONS: The BIOCHIP Mosaic is a standardized time- and serum-saving approach that further facilitates the serologic diagnosis of AIBD.

Blue light-emitting diode technology-operated microscopy is preferable to both short arc mercury lamp-operated microscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy for direct immunofluorescence images evaluation in routinely diagnosing subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases.

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy still is the gold standard in diagnosing and differentiating subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases (SABDs) from other bullous diseases. New optical systems were developed that aim to facilitate DIF images evaluation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of three fluorescence microscopy systems with different light source for routine diagnostics of SABDs with DIF. In total, perilesional tissue samples for DIF from 34 SABD patients were examined under the three commercial microscopy systems (short arc mercury lamp-operated microscopy-MLM, blue light-emitting diode technology-operated microscopy-bLED and laser scanning confocal microscopy-LSCM) for the detection and pattern analysis of IgA, IgG, IgG1, IgG4, C3 immunoreactants along the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) by three independent observers simultaneously. MLM, bLED, and LSCM provided comparable quality of disease-characterizing immunoreactants imaging (number of immunoreactant types detected and patterns of their deposition along DEJ were the same) but screening of slides was quicker using bLED than both LSCM and MLM, as statistical analysis indicated. It is concluded that bLED is an efficient and preferable system for routinely diagnosing SABDs cost-effectively. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: New optical systems were developed that aim to facilitate direct immunofluorescence evaluation. Here, we evaluate the usefulness of three fluorescence microscopy systems with different light source for routine diagnostics concluding that that bLED is an efficient and preferable system.