Bidirectional plasticity of GABAergic tonic inhibition in hippocampal somatostatin- and parvalbumin-containing interneurons.

GABAA receptors present in extrasynaptic areas mediate tonic inhibition in hippocampal neurons regulating the performance of neural networks. In this study, we investigated the effect of NMDA-induced plasticity on tonic inhibition in somatostatin- and parvalbumin-containing interneurons. Using pharmacological methods and transgenic mice (SST-Cre/PV-Cre x Ai14), we induced the plasticity of GABAergic transmission in somatostatin- and parvalbumin-containing interneurons by a brief (3 min) application of NMDA. In the whole-cell patch-clamp configuration, we measured tonic currents enhanced by specific agonists (etomidate or gaboxadol). Furthermore, in both the control and NMDA-treated groups, we examined to what extent these changes depend on the regulation of distinct subtypes of GABAA receptors. Tonic conductance in the somatostatin-containing (SST+) interneurons is enhanced after NMDA application, and the observed effect is associated with an increased content of α5-containing GABAARs. Both fast-spiking and non-fast-spiking parvalbumin-positive (PV+) cells showed a reduction of tonic inhibition after plasticity induction. This effect was accompanied in both PV+ interneuron types by a strongly reduced proportion of δ-subunit-containing GABAARs and a relatively small increase in currents mediated by α5-containing GABAARs. Both somatostatin- and parvalbumin-containing interneurons show cell type-dependent and opposite sign plasticity of tonic inhibition. The underlying mechanisms depend on the cell-specific balance of plastic changes in the contents of α5 and δ subunit-containing GABAARs.

Somatostatin and Somatostatin-Containing Interneurons-From Plasticity to Pathology.

Despite the obvious differences in the pathophysiology of distinct neuropsychiatric diseases or neurodegenerative disorders, some of them share some general but pivotal mechanisms, one of which is the disruption of excitation/inhibition balance. Such an imbalance can be generated by changes in the inhibitory system, very often mediated by somatostatin-containing interneurons (SOM-INs). In physiology, this group of inhibitory interneurons, as well as somatostatin itself, profoundly shapes the brain activity, thus influencing the behavior and plasticity; however, the changes in the number, density and activity of SOM-INs or levels of somatostatin are found throughout many neuropsychiatric and neurological conditions, both in patients and animal models. Here, we (1) briefly describe the brain somatostatinergic system, characterizing the neuropeptide somatostatin itself, its receptors and functions, as well the physiology and circuitry of SOM-INs; and (2) summarize the effects of the activity of somatostatin and SOM-INs in both physiological brain processes and pathological brain conditions, focusing primarily on learning-induced plasticity and encompassing selected neuropsychological and neurodegenerative disorders, respectively. The presented data indicate the somatostatinergic-system-mediated inhibition as a substantial factor in the mechanisms of neuroplasticity, often disrupted in a plethora of brain pathologies.

Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) on inhibitory interneurons in the barrel cortex.

Inhibitory interneurons in the cerebral cortex contain specific proteins or peptides characteristic for a certain interneuron subtype. In mice, three biochemical markers constitute non-overlapping interneuron populations, which account for 80-90% of all inhibitory cells. These interneurons express parvalbumin (PV), somatostatin (SST), or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). SST is not only a marker of a specific interneuron subtype, but also an important neuropeptide that participates in numerous biochemical and signalling pathways in the brain via somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5). In the nervous system, SST acts as a neuromodulator and neurotransmitter affecting, among others, memory, learning, and mood. In the sensory cortex, the co-localisation of GABA and SST is found in approximately 30% of interneurons. Considering the importance of interactions between inhibitory interneurons in cortical plasticity and the possible GABA and SST co-release, it seems important to investigate the localisation of different SSTRs on cortical interneurons. Here, we examined the distribution of SSTR1-5 on barrel cortex interneurons containing PV, SST, or VIP. Immunofluorescent staining using specific antibodies was performed on brain sections from transgenic mice that expressed red fluorescence in one specific interneuron subtype (PV-Ai14, SST-Ai14, and VIP-Ai14 mice). SSTRs expression on PV, SST, and VIP interneurons varied among the cortical layers and we found two patterns of SSTRs distribution in L4 of barrel cortex. We also demonstrated that, in contrast to other interneurons, PV cells did not express SSTR2, but expressed other SSTRs. SST interneurons, which were not found to make chemical synapses among themselves, expressed all five SSTR subtypes.

Noradrenergic signaling in the VTA modulates cocaine craving.

Exposure to drug-associated cues evokes drug-seeking behavior and is regarded as a major cause of relapse. Conditional stimulus upregulates noradrenaline (NA) system activity, but the drug-seeking behavior depends particularly on phasic dopamine signaling downstream from the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The VTA dopamine-ergic activity is regulated via the signaling of alpha1 -adrenergic and alpha2 -adrenergic receptors (α1 -ARs and α2 -ARs); thus, the impact of the conditional stimulus on drug-seeking behavior might involve NAergic signaling in the VTA. To date, the role of VTA ARs in regulating cocaine seeking was not studied. We found that cocaine seeking under extinction conditions in male Sprague-Dawley rats was attenuated by intra-VTA prazosin or terazosin-two selective α1 -AR antagonists. In contrast, cocaine seeking was facilitated by intra-VTA administration of the selective α1 -AR agonist phenylephrine as well as α2 -AR antagonist RX 821002, whereas the selective ß-AR antagonist propranolol had no effects. In addition, blockade of α1 -AR in the VTA prevented α2 -AR antagonist-induced enhancement of cocaine seeking. Importantly, the potential non-specific effects of the VTA AR blockade on cocaine seeking could be excluded, because none of the AR antagonists influenced sucrose seeking under extinction conditions or locomotor activity in the open field test. These results demonstrate that NAergic signaling potently and selectively regulates cocaine seeking during early cocaine withdrawal via VTA α1 -AR and α2 -AR but not ß-AR. Our findings provide new insight into the NAergic mechanisms that underlie cocaine craving.

Somatostatin receptors in the brain.

Somatostatin is a peptide that participates in numerous biochemical and signaling pathways. It functions via receptors (SSTRs1-5), which belong to the family of receptors coupled with protein G. All somatostatin receptors are characterized by a certain degree of homology in molecular structure. The cell effects of their agonists in peripheral tissues rely mainly on the inhibition of the hormones release. Somatostatin is also an important neuromodulator and neurotransmitter. SSTRs may affect other receptors, forming structural and functional homodimers and heterodimers. SSTRs play also role in the regulation of physiological processes, such as itching and pain, reproductive functions, regulation of feeding or mood. Besides physiological functions, SSTRs contribute also to the pathogenesis of glial tumors, neurodegenerative diseases, or post hemorrhagic stroke changes. Recent years of research have provided new data regarding the role of somatostatin receptor signaling pathways in the brain and the knowledge in this field is developing rapidly.

Alpha1-adrenergic receptor blockade in the VTA modulates fear memories and stress responses.

Activity of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and its terminals has been implicated in the Pavlovian associative learning of both stressful and rewarding stimuli. However, the role of the VTA noradrenergic signaling in fear responses remains unclear. We aimed to examine how alpha1-adrenergic receptor (α1-AR) signaling in the VTA affects conditioned fear. The role of α1-AR was assessed using the micro-infusions into the VTA of the selective antagonists (0.1-1µg/0.5µl prazosin and 1µg/0.5µl terazosin) in acquisition and expression of fear memory. In addition, we performed control experiments with α1-AR blockade in the mammillary bodies (MB) - a brain region with α1-AR expression adjacent to the VTA. Intra-VTA but not intra-MB α1-AR blockade prevented formation and retrieval of fear memories. Importantly, local administration of α1-AR antagonists did not influence footshock sensitivity, locomotion or anxiety-like behaviors. Similarly, α1-AR blockade in the VTA had no effects on negative affect measured as number of 22kHz ultrasonic vocalizations during fear conditioning training. We propose that noradrenergic signaling in the VTA via α1-AR regulates formation and retrieval of fear memories but not other behavioral responses to stressful environmental stimuli. It enhances the encoding of environmental stimuli by the VTA to form and retrieve conditioned fear memories and to predict future behavioral outcomes. Our results provide novel insight into the role of the VTA α1-AR signaling in the regulation of stress responsiveness and fear memory.

Application of the DREADD technique in biomedical brain research.

The DREADD (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) technique is a new chemogenetic approach allowing for selective and remote control of neural activity with a high degree of spatial resolution. Since its discovery in 2007 the DREADD technique was successfully employed into basic research, and together with the optogenetic method provided so far the best tool to influence the activity of the brain circuits and cell populations. The first aim of this review was to concisely describe the technique with regard to such issues like the history of its development, biochemistry as well as modes of the designer receptors delivery and expression. The other aim was to summarize approaches employed for probing of the brain circuits using the DREADD technique and to characterize the current knowledge of the method's application in medical research focusing on two diseases - Parkinson's disease and drug addiction - in which designer receptors were found notably valuable.