Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Clin Med ; 11(15)2022 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35956010

ABSTRACT

Background. The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with overweight and obesity is increasing. It was shown that obesity is related to inferior patient and graft survival. We aimed to analyze intraoperative parameters and postoperative short and long-term course of kidney transplantation (KT) in body mass index (BMI)-stratified cohorts of KTRs. Methods. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively built database of 433 KTRs from 2014 to 2017 from a single transplant center was performed. The objective of the study was to analyze the association between BMI at the time of transplantation with intraoperative parameters, adverse events in early postoperative course, and the overall mortality and graft loss in BMI-stratified cohorts: normal (18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25−29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). Results. Obesity was related to longer total procedure time (p = 0.0025) and longer warm ischemia time (p = 0.0003). The postoperative course in obese patients was complicated by higher incidence of DGF (delayed graft function), early surgical complications (defined as surgical complications <30 days from KT), reoperation rate, vascular complications, incidence of lymphocele and wound dehiscence. There was no difference between the normal weight and overweight KTRs. The one-month kidney function (p = 0.0001) and allograft survival (p = 0.029) were significantly inferior in obese patients with no difference between normal weight and overweight patients. One-year death-censored graft survival was better in patients with BMI < 30 (88.6 vs. 94.8% p = 0.05). BMI was a significant predictor of graft loss in univariate (p = 0.04) but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.09). Conclusion. Pretransplant obesity significantly affects the intraoperative and postoperative course of kidney transplantation and graft function and survival. The course of transplantation of overweight is comparable to normal BMI KTRs, and presumably pretransplant weight reduction to the BMI < 30 kg/m2 may improve the short-term postoperative course of transplantation as well as may improve graft survival. Thus, pretransplant weight reduction in obese KTRs may significantly improve the results of kidney transplantation. Metabolic surgery may play a role in improving results of KT.

2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 26(11): 2255-2265, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of RYGB and OAGB on patients after failed treatment of obesity by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study based on a prospectively maintained database of reoperated patients after failed LSG, which included 33 patients who underwent RYGB conversion and 47 patients who underwent OAGB conversion. RESULT: The mean %EBWL after a 5-year follow-up for RYGBc vs OAGBc was 84.04% vs 72.95% (p = 0.2176), respectively. Complete long-term diabetes remission was observed significantly more frequently in the OAGBc than in the RYGBc group (97.3% vs 33%; p = 0.035). There were no other statistically significant differences in the remission rate of comorbidities between RYGBc and OAGBc: hypertension 30% vs 27.3% (p = 0.261), dyslipidemia 83.3% vs 59.1% (p = 0.277), OSAS 100% vs 60% (p = 0.639), and GERD 40% vs 71.4% (p > 0.99), respectively. 7 patients were newly diagnosed with GERD after OAGBc and none after RYGBc. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications between the OAGBc and RYGB groups. The Comprehensive Complication Index was 17.85 (± IQR 29.6) in the OAGBc group and 14.92 (± IQR 21.75) in the RYGBc group (p = 0.375). CONCLUSION: The authors recognized complete long-term type 2 diabetes remission after conversion surgery as the most relevant difference, where the OAGB variety was found superior for its better efficacy. Any other statistically significant differences in the consequences after both conversion procedures used after the failure of LSG have not been stated. Both methods therefore can be considered to complete the initial treatment, considering the preferences and individual burdens of the patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Gastric Bypass , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/methods , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Weight Loss , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Laparoscopy/methods
3.
Front Oncol ; 11: 689701, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34123858

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage due to the invasiveness of colonoscopy; thus, non-invasive CRC diagnostics are desirable. CRC is associated with lipid alterations. We aimed to verify whether fatty acid (FA) profiles in CRC patients may serve as a potential diagnostic tool for CRC diagnosis. FA profiles were assayed by GC-MS in cancer tissue, paired normal mucosa and serum from CRC patients and healthy controls. The levels of very long FAs - VLCFAs (26:0, 28:0 and 26:1) were the most highly increased FAs in cancer tissue compared to normal colon mucosa. Moreover, these FA were present in serum of CRC patients, they were absent in the serum of healthy subjects, or present in only trace amounts. To verify if cancer cells are the source of small amounts of these VLCFAs in the serum of patients we performed experiment in HT-29 CRC cells, which proved that CRC cells can produce and release VLCFAs into the blood. Most importantly, we defined a panel of FAs that may be assayed in a single analysis that definitely distinguishes CRC patients and healthy subjects, which was confirmed by PLS-DA and multivariate ROC analysis (AUC = 0.985). This study shows that selected FA panel may serve as a diagnostic marker for CRC.

4.
Obes Surg ; 30(7): 2708-2714, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32249367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The number of morbidly obese kidney transplant candidates is growing. They have limited access to kidney transplantation and are at a higher risk of postoperative complications. Bariatric surgery is considered as a safe weight loss method in those patients. OBJECTIVES: Matched pair analysis was designed to analyze the preparatory and postoperative weight loss after bariatric procedures in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and non-ESKD morbidly obese patients. METHODS: Twenty patients with ESKD underwent bariatric surgery in our Centre of Excellence for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery between 2015 and 2019 (nine one-anastomosis gastric bypasses, nine Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses, and two sleeve gastrectomies). They were compared with matched pairs from a dataset of 1199 morbidly obese patients without ESKD. Data on demographic factors and comorbidities was recorded. BMI was obtained at the start of the preparatory period preceding the bariatric procedure, at the time of procedure, and during the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The ESKD and non-ESKD patients did not differ significantly in preoperative weight loss (13.00 ± 11.69 kg and 15.22 ± 15.96 kg respectively, p = 0.619). During the 1-year follow-up, the weight loss was similar to the non-ESKD group. In the first 3 months, faster weight loss in ESKD was observed. Initial and follow-up BMI values did not differ significantly between groups. We demonstrated that obese patients with ESKD can lose weight as effectively as non-ESKD patients. CONCLUSION: Morbidly obese ESKD patients have an equal weight loss to patients without ESKD. Bariatric surgery could improve access to kidney transplantation and may potentially improve transplantation outcomes of obese patients with ESKD.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Matched-Pair Analysis , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss
5.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ; 128(4): 255-262, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149418

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Statins act by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and are an important drug class in the treatment of lipid disorders. They lower cholesterol levels and modulate cardiovascular disease risk in both primary and secondary prevention. In addition, some studies have shown that statins may have an effect on colorectal cancer development and treatment. Our objective is to summarize published studies on the effect of statins on colorectal carcinogenesis. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies published between April 2010 and April 2018 that investigated the association between statin use and colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 126 articles were identified with our search strategy. Based on the eligibility criteria, 69 studies were excluded from the review process. In vitro and animal studies have shown a potential chemopreventive effect of statins and their efficacy in adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer. The anticarcinogenic effect on cancer risk in human studies was heterogeneous. Some studies reported better overall and cancer specific survival rates in patients using statins before and during colorectal cancer treatment. Statins also show a potential role in chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulating evidence suggests that statins may have a role in colorectal cancer prevention and treatment. Further studies are necessary to define the associations between individual statin characteristics, their doses and colorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans
6.
Endokrynol Pol ; 70(2): 190-197, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039272

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death. The prevalence of colorectal neoplasm is increasing. Many studies have shown that thyroid dysfunction may be connected with the higher risk of pancreatic and breast cancer, but only a few described the role of thyroid dysfunction and thyroid hormone (TH) replacement in the development and risk of CRC. The aim of this study is to summarise all findings and potentially elucidate the connection between TH imbalance and colorectal cancer. The systematic review was conducted according to PICO and PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu, and Cochrane Library databases using the following keywords: "((((thyroid OR hypothyroidism OR hyperthyroidism OR levothyroxine OR hashimoto OR graves OR thyroidectomy)) AND (colon OR colorectal OR CRC)) NOT hashimoto[Author]) NOT graves[Author])". No filters were used. Of total of 3054 articles identified by the search strategy, 11 met PICO criteria and were included into the review. Four of those were on cell lines and seven were human studies. Analysis of the included studies revealed an elevated risk of CRC in patients with hypothyroidism with aORs ranging from 1.16 (95% CI: 1.08-1.24, p < 0.001) to 1.69 (95% CI: 1.21-2.36, p = 0.002). Moreover, TH replacement therapy has a protective effect for CRC risk with aOR ranging from 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44-0.81, p = 0.001) to 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98, p = 0.009). THs seem to play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Further studies are warranted to define the exact role of thyroid hormone imbalance in prevention and treatment of CRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Hyperthyroidism/metabolism , Hypothyroidism/metabolism , Thyroid Hormones/metabolism , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Hyperthyroidism/complications , Hypothyroidism/complications , Risk Factors
7.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ; 127(7): 445-454, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29954001

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The development of preventive strategies in CRC has been the subject of much research. Multiple studies have shown an association between diabetes and CRC. In addition to its glucose-lowering properties, metformin might have an additional role in the prevention and treatment of CRC. OUR OBJECTIVE: was to summarize findings on role of metformin in colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 2005 to December 2017 in search for studies on the association between metformin and CRC. RESULTS: Of the total of 189 studies identified by the search, we excluded 123 studies and reviewed the remaining 66 studies on cell lines, animals, patients with diabetes, and healthy subjects. In vitro and animal studies have shown a protective effect of metformin use on the incidence of CRC and amplification of the therapeutic effects of CRC chemotherapy. Studies on patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin analyzed data on total of 146 496 patients. The results of those studies on the role of metformin in CRC suggest risk reduction and potential applications within therapeutic regimens, although some of those are conflicting. CONCLUSION: Further studies are warranted to define the role of metformin in both prevention and treatment of CRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/pathology , Humans , Incidence
8.
Ann Transplant ; 23: 782-788, 2018 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30409961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Screening colonoscopy is not obligatory in kidney pre-transplant work-up guidelines. According to recommendations, only transplant recipients over age 50 years should be screened. The aim of this study was to characterize endoscopic findings revealed as part of pre-transplant work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed pre-transplant work-up charts of 434 adult patients who received a cadaveric donor kidney transplantation (KT) from 2012 to 2015. Endoscopic findings analysis with age subgroup (<50 and ³50) analysis were performed. RESULTS Out of 434 of patients that underwent KT, 29% have had a colonoscopy. In 75.6% of those, pathologies were found. Hemorrhoids were found in 33% and polyps in 30.7% of patients. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 18.1% (67.5% distal predominance). Advanced ADR was 10.2% (distal predominance). Diverticulosis was found in 28.3% of patients and ulcerative colitis was found in 2.4%. In age subgroup analysis, ADR was higher in patients ³50 years compared to those <50 years (21.6% vs. 4%; p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS Colonoscopy as part of pre-transplant work-up enables removal of precancerous lesions and management of benign findings. All candidates meeting criteria for the general population should be screened. Patients under age 50 years could also benefit from colonoscopy as part of the pre-transplant work-up. Therefore, we suggest that baseline colonoscopy should be included in pre-transplant work-up guidelines for all patients, regardless of age. However, further studies are needed to confirm this recommendation.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Preoperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Diseases/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
9.
BMC Surg ; 16: 20, 2016 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27090728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a malignant neoplasm with a high mortality rate, often associated with a delayed diagnosis, the early occurrence of metastasis and an overall, poor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Pain management in pancreatic cancer consists mainly of pharmacological treatment according to the WHO analgesic ladder. Surgical treatment for pain relief, such as splanchnicectomy, is considered amongst the final step of pain management. It has been proven that splanchnicectomy is a safe procedure with a small percentage of complications, nevertheless, it is often used as a last resort, which can significantly decrease its effectiveness. Performance of thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy along the first step of the analgesic ladder may lead to long-lasting protection against the presence and severity of pain. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective, open label, 1:1 randomized, controlled trial, conducted at a single institution to determine the effectiveness of invasive treatment of pain via splanchnicectomy, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The size of tested group will consist of 26 participants in each arm of the trial, to evaluate the level of pain relief and its impact on quality of life. To evaluate the influence on patients' rate of overall survival, a sample size of 105 patients is necessary, in each trial arm. Assessments will not only include the usage of analgesic pharmacotherapy throughout the course of disease, and overall patient survival, but also subjective pain perception at rest, in movement, and after meals (measured by NRS score questionnaire), the patient's quality of life (measured using the QLQ-C30 and FACIT questionnaires), and any pain-related suffering (measured with the PRISM projection test). The primary endpoint will consist of pain intensity. Questionnaires will be obtained upon the initial visit, the day of surgery, the day after surgery, as well as during long-term follow-up visits, held every two weeks thereafter. DISCUSSION: Earlier implementation of invasive treatment, such as thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy, can provide a higher efficacy of pain management, prevent deterioration in the patient's quality of life, and lengthen their overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02424279. Date of registration January 2, 2015.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Pain, Intractable/etiology , Pain, Intractable/therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Splanchnic Nerves/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , World Health Organization
10.
Pol Przegl Chir ; 87(7): 368-70, 2015 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26351793

ABSTRACT

Paraganglioma is a rare neoplasm originating from extra-adrenal pheochromocytes of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system. It is usually benign and the treatment method of choice is a complete resection of the tumour. The authors present a case of 66-year-old female patient with a multifocal benign retroperitoneal paraganglioma, which was completely removed during surgery.


Subject(s)
Paraganglioma, Extra-Adrenal/diagnosis , Paraganglioma, Extra-Adrenal/surgery , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...